Blue Oval Guide Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Ford Motor Company Yearly Sales Figures: 1998 - 2018(totals include all divisions of Ford Motor Co., and all products: cars/trucks). 1998: 3,922,604 1999: 4,163,369 2000: 4,202,820 2001: 3,971,364 2002: 3,622,709 2003: 3,483,719 2004: 3,331,676 2005: 3,168,156 2006: 2,918,674 2007: 2,507,366 2008: 1,988,376 2009: 1,620,888 2010: 1,935,462 2011: 2,148,806 2012: 2,250,165 2013: 2,493,918 2014: 2,480,942 2015: 2,613,162 2016: 2,614,697 2017: 2,586,715 2018: 2,497,318 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fordtech1 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Pretty amazing to see the roller coaster of numbers. What’s interesting to me I always considered 1998 to be a good vehicle year for ford. That’s the last year of explorer and Taurus when they were full of features. Then in 99 ford started cheapening them up by de contenting them. No wonder they CEO’s were drunk on profits. It took 9 years to stop the fall of numbers. Of course the recession didn’t help that. Guess we will see how it goes from here. Only thing I see ford needed to do yesterday is get better suppliers/quality control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trailhiker Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Looking back, I've only bought 2 vehicles in that time frame! I love Fords, but I like my money too, so I keep my Fords longer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assimilator Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 (edited) FWIW, Ford is still the bestselling brand in the US. Globally Ford is a dramatically smaller company than it was, mostly because it failed to capitalize on growth markets like GM, Toyota, Hyundai, and VW and has instead focused on profitability in no-growth markets like North America and Europe. Unfortunately Ford is just a zero growth company which is why Wall Street hates them so much. I think they are just focusing on improving their balance sheet so they can invest for growth. Edited January 9, 2019 by Assimilator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rperez817 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 21 minutes ago, Assimilator said: Unfortunately Ford is just a zero growth company which is why Wall Street hates them so much. I think they are just focusing on improving their balance sheet so they can invest for growth. Yes sir. Ford is doing the right things with Hackett's fitness initiatives. Including things that will result a more solid balance sheet. They desperately need to get back on track as a company before pursuing sales growth. I said the following in another thread last August. It still applies today. Sales growth should not be a priority for Ford right now. Particularly in non-core segments and regions. Ford has a lot of organizational issues that have to be fixed first. Here are some thoughts business consultants Jim Blasingame and Peter Meyer had about the fallacies of growth. "If a tree is bent, fertilizing it won't make it grow straighter – only faster in the wrong direction. If you have organizational challenges, don't grow until they’re resolved." "One of the rudest awakenings any business can have is when projected sales growth is achieved, but profit is no better, or perhaps worse, than a period of lower sales." "Being the market leader is overrated. Peter cites research showing only 29% of market leaders were also profit leaders. Not only are you not going to sell every customer, you don't want every customer. Many customers, and some customer profiles, aren’t profitable. Remember, you don't spend sales." "Write this on a rock ... Just because you can grow your business doesn't mean you should." I think Hackett understands all this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted January 29, 2019 Share Posted January 29, 2019 (edited) On 1/9/2019 at 9:55 PM, fordtech1 said: Pretty amazing to see the roller coaster of numbers. What’s interesting to me I always considered 1998 to be a good vehicle year for ford. That’s the last year of explorer and Taurus when they were full of features. Then in 99 ford started cheapening them up by de contenting them. No wonder they CEO’s were drunk on profits. It took 9 years to stop the fall of numbers. Of course the recession didn’t help that. Guess we will see how it goes from here. Only thing I see ford needed to do yesterday is get better suppliers/quality control. The arrival of Nasser as CEO, he had a big issue, only F series and Explorer were profitable but instead of fortifying Ford's related brands, he set about trying to diversify income away from the Ford brand. History brands him as foolish but he did inherit a huge war chest of cash and after he was fired, Bill Ford managed to go through the lot by 2005.... Ford Motor sales slowly displaced by the new Performance Auto group as Lincoln and Mercury fell into disrepair selling off Avis, then the crunch hit and Mulally forced Ford into giving up on Mazda, Aston Martin, Jaguar, Land Rover and even Volvo..all down the tubes at a loss.. I see eerily similar things happening today with JH and Bill Ford controlling "Pinocchio..." AV, EV Mobility.making losses just like PAG Edited January 29, 2019 by jpd80 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardK Posted March 28, 2019 Share Posted March 28, 2019 The upstarts, especially from Korea, have directly impacted the unit sales and market share of Ford and the other manufacturers. Here are the sales figures for 2000 and 2018. 2000 2018 Kia 160606 589673 Hyundai 244391 667634 I am sure there are other examples. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.