Jump to content

Gm's newest V8... 400cid/6.6L?.


Fgts

Recommended Posts

That's outmatched by the current 6.2L in the. The new 7.3L should destroy it.

As in how for the 6.2?, in Raptor tune it was 411 hp, in SD form it's 385 hp. The 6.6 is 400hp +, I expect the 7.3 to make more but not that much.

Edited by Fgts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As in how for the 6.2?, in Raptor tune it was 411 hp, in SD form it's 385 hp. The 6.6 is 400hp +, I expect the 7.3 to make more but not that much.

 

The current 6.2L has 385HP/430 ft-lbs. I would trade the 15 HP for 30 ft-lbs all day in a truck.

 

Personally, I expect around 450/500 out of the 7.3. Another 100 ft-lbs (25%) is drastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I hear, both the 7X and the G.M. 6.6 are going to come in around 400 h.p./450 ft. lbs.. These are truck engines tuned for reliability and low end torque.

 

Not sure exactly what the GM 6.6L is, my hunch is that it will be a tall deck Gen. V LS derivative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GM is only looking at replacing the 6.0 in 2500 and 3500 trucks so the 6.6 will probably be perfect

with ~400 HP and ~450 lb ft. that should go well against the Ford 6.2's 385 Hp and 430 Lb Ft.

 

In Medium Duty, the 6.8 V10 is rated at 320 HP/ 460 lb ft, in Super duty it was 362 HP / 457 lb ft.

So I can see the new Ford 7.3 V8 probably adding about 30Hp and 30 lb ft to both sets of 6.8 figures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would consider 400/450 in the new 7.X to be a disaster of epic proportions, particularly as it required a new design and a new production line.

 

To be worth the investment, this engine needs to be useable in more than just the E-450 and F-650/750. Which means it needs to be useable in Class 3 F-series and needs significantly more powerful than 400/450 in that application.

 

Equivalent power density to the current 6.2L at 7.3L would be about 455/510. A 7L at that power density would be 435/485. The Boss had that displacement in its initial design and per the engine program's chief engineer, just needed upgraded exhaust valves and manifolds to pass the HDE dyno tests. It would make no sense to design a whole new engine with a significantly lower power density than this when they could just drop the 7L Boss into production on the existing line

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would consider 400/450 in the new 7.X to be a disaster of epic proportions, particularly as it required a new design and a new production line.

 

To be worth the investment, this engine needs to be useable in more than just the E-450 and F-650/750. Which means it needs to be useable in Class 3 F-series and needs significantly more powerful than 400/450 in that application.

 

Equivalent power density to the current 6.2L at 7.3L would be about 455/510. A 7L at that power density would be 435/485. The Boss had that displacement in its initial design and per the engine program's chief engineer, just needed upgraded exhaust valves and manifolds to pass the HDE dyno tests. It would make no sense to design a whole new engine with a significantly lower power density than this when they could just drop the 7L Boss into production on the existing line

.

I am sure the new 7.X V8 will also end up in the E350/E450/F53/F59 stripped chassis designs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GM is only looking at replacing the 6.0 in 2500 and 3500 trucks so the 6.6 will probably be perfect

with ~400 HP and ~450 lb ft. that should go well against the Ford 6.2's 385 Hp and 430 Lb Ft.

 

In Medium Duty, the 6.8 V10 is rated at 320 HP/ 460 lb ft, in Super duty it was 362 HP / 457 lb ft.

So I can see the new Ford 7.3 V8 probably adding about 30Hp and 30 lb ft to both sets of 6.8 figures.

 

No, I do not believe GM's new 6.6L will only be in 2500's and 3500's. I hear it's being developed for medium duty and possibly other OEM applications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK,if the new 6.6 V8 is going into Medium Duty, then it will probably fill a similar role as the 6.8 V10 but with more power and efficiency.

I dunno, it might be a little light on for capacity in the really big stuff like class 6 and 7 but should be right at home in class 4 and 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So GM jumped the shark and is bringing us a 400/400 motor that will be out-torqued by.... let's see here:

 

The Ford gen 1 6.2L

The Ford gen 2 6.2L

The Ford 3v 6.8L

The Ford 2v 6.8L (since 1999!!!!)

The Ford 7.5L bbf (since 1993!!!!)

The Ram 6.4L hemi

The Dodge/Jeep 6.1L hemi

The GM 7.4L vortec (since 1996!!!!)

The GM 8.1L

 

Talk about bringing a knife to a gun fight!

 

This is a rumor that makes no sense at all. Why would GM go through the trouble of raising deck height only to add marginal output to the current, yet ancient, 6.0L (360 hp / 380 ft-lbs)?

 

Also, anyone who believes the 7.x is going to be any less than 450/500 isn't thinking straight. As was already pointed out, the 6.2 already does 385/430. What is all that extra displacement going to do? Heck - the rev-happy tiny little 5L in the mustang makes 420 ft-lbs for pete's sake.

 

The existing V10 could have been updated to make 450/500 without changing much besides the head. It would make zero sense to spend millions on a new engine and production line if it's not going to significantly exceed the capability of every other gas truck engine currently on the market.

Edited by Sevensecondsuv
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...