Jump to content

GT500 spied with automatic transmission


Recommended Posts

You need empathy because ONE mustang model that you (and most of the others complaining) would never actually purchase doesn’t come with a manual, while all the other models that you might purchase still come with a manual? And the DCT not only offers better performance but probably higher ATPs and wider appeal?

 

Mmmmkay.

 

Your missing the point. I t is about the trend and not one model. Who knows what happens with even the GT in 10 years. I would assume most on this board love to drive, even though they don't care about a manual. What will you all be saying if cars were going to all autonomous. And laws were being considered to not allow drivers on public roads. Who would be complaining then? Well it would just be technology replacing what your input is no longer needed for like steering, accelerating and and braking. It is all being done better and more efficient so why are you complaining? Just sit there and enjoy the ride. Sucks doesn't it?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Your missing the point. I t is about the trend and not one model. Who knows what happens with even the GT in 10 years. I would assume most on this board love to drive, even though they don't care about a manual. What will you all be saying if cars were going to all autonomous. And laws were being considered to not allow drivers on public roads. Who would be complaining then? Well it would just be technology replacing what your input is no longer needed for like steering, accelerating and and braking. It is all being done better and more efficient so why are you complaining? Just sit there and enjoy the ride. Sucks doesn't it?

My Uncle has a country place

That no one knows about

He says it used to be a farm

Before the motor law

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Auto companies are building cars that the majority of the public wants to buy and that they can sell at a profit. There aren’t enough buyers for manuals in most vehicles and in others a DCT is a better option and more popular. Again it goes back to what people want to buy.

 

If nobody wants to buy a conventional car and everyone wants an autonomous car then that’s what the mfrs will build. But I don’t see that happening at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Auto companies are building cars that the majority of the public wants to buy and that they can sell at a profit. There aren’t enough buyers for manuals in most vehicles and in others a DCT is a better option and more popular. Again it goes back to what people want to buy.

 

If nobody wants to buy a conventional car and everyone wants an autonomous car then that’s what the mfrs will build. But I don’t see that happening at all.

I partially agree with you but I'll add this to the thought.

 

US manufacturers have notoriously thought they knew what Americans wanted more than Americans did. Their arrogance is one factor that lead to the Japanese domination of American auto sales. This was done by creating a self fulfilling prophesy. Hang your best selling cars out on the vine to rot; then discontinue them "because no one is buying cars".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if 80% of people wanted autonomius cars and the manufacturers decided it was cheaper to manufacture only autonomous or the government decided it was safer the 20% would not be unhappy about it?

Edited by 72 Mach 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I partially agree with you but I'll add this to the thought.

 

US manufacturers have notoriously thought they knew what Americans wanted more than Americans did. Their arrogance is one factor that lead to the Japanese domination of American auto sales. This was done by creating a self fulfilling prophesy. Hang your best selling cars out on the vine to rot; then discontinue them "because no one is buying cars".

 

But others including the Japanese are seeing exactly the same trend. Fewer sedans and more utilities.

 

I don’t know why I have to keep saying this but the vaunted Accord which is BRAND NEW is down considerably and offering discounts - that never happened before. Camry is also down the last 2 years with a relatively new version.

 

The entire market is down. It’s not just Ford and it’s not just domestics.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the whole "I love my standard transmission" argument (I have a 1995 F-150 with a 300ci I-6 and 5 speed stick), but lets face it...they cannot beat an automatic in shifting precision and emissions regulations. They are not like the "slush-boxes" of yore...

As long as it has a fluid coupling instead of a mechanical connection, it'll always be a slushbox. YMMV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But lock-up converters have taken the slush out of the slushbox under many conditions.

Hahahahaha!

 

I would love it if the lockup converter in the 4R100 in my Excursion would function in anywhere near a logical manner. It's only got 75k on it so I'll be stuck with it for years yet, but I'm really looking forward to the day I put a ZF S6-650 in it's place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahahahaha!

I would love it if the lockup converter in the 4R100 in my Excursion would function in anywhere near a logical manner. It's only got 75k on it so I'll be stuck with it for years yet, but I'm really looking forward to the day I put a ZF S6-650 in it's place.

You really need to drive something with a nice, modern automatic...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can get a Goldwing with a 7 speed DCT. No clutch lever.

"You can get" being the operative phrase.

 

I don't think anybody is saying that you shouldn't be able to get a DCT, or even that the GT500 shouldn't have one, just that your choice shouldn't be between two self-shifting transmissions.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind the goal of manufacturers: to make money.

 

Will offering a DCT increase your customer base and enable you to make more money off the vehicle than the cost of the transmission and certification? Likely.

Will offering a manual increase your customer base and enable you to make more money off the vehicle than the cost of the transmission and certification? Likely not.

 

So there you have it

 

I expect the manual to hang around in the Mustang for quite some time, just not in the GT500.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Let's just say you're biased then...

I'm biased because I want the transmission to shift and lockup in such a manner that it maximizes engine output by keeping it in its powerband and makes driving enjoyable instead of maximizing the parameters EPA cares about?

 

I have been in automatics that have been built and tuned for performance. Even a sloppy old C6 with the right internals and a converter to match the engine is bolted to is a joy to drive. It's even better with a lockup o/d trans like the 4R100, and better still with a 6R80.

 

But let's admit that factory tunes are taylored first and foremost for the EPA tests and the actual customer a distant second. That fact has much to do with the demise of the manual trans. Much harder to control a human shifter on the EPA tests than a programmable automatic transmission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm biased because I want the transmission to shift and lockup in such a manner that it maximizes engine output by keeping it in its powerband and makes driving enjoyable instead of maximizing the parameters EPA cares about?

 

I have been in automatics that have been built and tuned for performance. Even a sloppy old C6 with the right internals and a converter to match the engine is bolted to is a joy to drive. It's even better with a lockup o/d trans like the 4R100, and better still with a 6R80.

 

But let's admit that factory tunes are taylored first and foremost for the EPA tests and the actual customer a distant second. That fact has much to do with the demise of the manual trans. Much harder to control a human shifter on the EPA tests than a programmable automatic transmission.

 

Try putting one in sport mode.

 

Or, better yet, drive a Super Duty diesel, turn on the exhaust brake, put it in tow/haul mode, and it drives darn close to a manual without the need to actual shift it yourself. Or, just put it in 'M' mode and shift it yourself.

 

They could be programmed to be a lot closer to what you are asking, and along with firmer shifts, would be better for the EPA. However, consumers don't want a stiff transmission, then want something smooth with imperceptible shifts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...