Jump to content

The 2019 Ford Raptor Ranger Is Your Diesel Off-Road Performance Truck Dream Come True


Recommended Posts

websites have been making comparisons...

 

First Autoblog: https://www.autoblog.com/2018/02/08/ford-ranger-raptor-chevy-colorado-zr2-comparison/

 

Screen+Shot+2018-02-07+at+1.50.14+PM.png

 

And Motor1... Raptor vs. Corlorado ZR2 and Tacoma TRD Bro... I mean TRD Pro: https://www.motor1.com/features/229765/ford-ranger-raptor-comparison/

 

 

 

On paper, the Ford Ranger Raptor is second to last in terms of horsepower, just behind the diesel ZR2. With only 210 horsepower (156 kilowatts) via a 2.0-liter turbodiesel engine, the gas-powered Colorado ZR2 is up 98 horses on the Ranger Raptor, and the Tacoma is up 68. That said, the diesel engine in the Ranger Raptor provides plenty of torque – 369 pound-feet (500 Newton-meters) of it. That makes it equal to the Colorado ZR2 diesel (369 lb-ft), far superior to the V6-powered Tacoma TRD Pro (265 lb-ft), and ideal for off roading, of course.

 

But the engine doesn’t paint the entire performance picture. With a custom Fox suspension and coilover Watts Link rear setup, the Ranger Raptor was made for rough stuff. The 17-inch BF Goodrich All-Terrain tires match those found on the ZR2, and exceed the 16-inch wheels found on the Tacoma. The brakes are larger, too. A set of 13-inch rotors are available, front and back, and best the ZR2 by .8 inches, and the Tacoma by 2.2 inches.

 

Riding high, the Ranger Raptor has a ground clearance of 11.1 inches. That’s better than the ZR2 (8.9 inches), the Tacoma TRD Pro (9.4 inches), and yes, even the new Wrangler Rubicon (10.8 inches). With an approach angle of 32.5 inches, the Raptor is competitive with the surprisingly superior Tacoma, and better than the ZR2 overall. Of course, when talking about off-road angles, the Wrangler Rubicon remains king (44 / 27.8 / 37), but only just.

"The standout experience of the Ranger Raptor, hands down, is how far you can push it off-road versus any other available production road vehicle in our markets, and still ride like a millionaire on-road," said Damien Ross, Chief Program Engineer, Ranger Raptor, Ford Motor Company. The new Ranger Raptor was tested extensively in the rugged terrain of the Australian outback, so you know it's built for anything.

Both the Ranger and the hardcore Ranger Raptor won't be available for a few months still. But stacking up the new Ford trucks against their closest competition should give you something to be excited about.

Edited by bzcat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The US spec Ranger Raptor, if there is one, will probably start around $45k, and fully loaded around $55k. This is based on what Chevy Colorado ZR2 crew cab V6 costs (~$42k) but factor in Raptor-grade suspension upgrades and more standard equipment since ZR2 is more like FX4 than Raptor.

 

Also the US spec Ranger Raptor will most likely be a more powerful and faster truck than the rest of the world version (assuming 2.7 Ecoboost V6).

So at the price of a new power wagon i can have this???..just wow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Autoblog:

 

 

 

The chief engineer at Ford Performance, Jamal Hameedi, bolstered such expectations when he told Australian outlet Drive during the launch in Bangkok, "Raptors are a slam dunk for the U.S. I think it [the Ranger Raptor] would do really well in the States." He added, however, that since the U.S. already has the F-150 Raptor, "our first priority is to get a Raptor available to everyone on the planet Earth."
Edited by rmc523
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in other words, you guys are are already getting the F-150 Raptor, and while we know without a doubt that the Ranger Raptor would sell like hotcakes in the US, just shut up and buy what we allow you to buy because we know better than you do what you really need. The gospel according to Ford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in other words, you guys are are already getting the F-150 Raptor, and while we know without a doubt that the Ranger Raptor would sell like hotcakes in the US, just shut up and buy what we allow you to buy because we know better than you do what you really need. The gospel according to Ford.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in other words, you guys are are already getting the F-150 Raptor, and while we know without a doubt that the Ranger Raptor would sell like hotcakes in the US, just shut up and buy what we allow you to buy because we know better than you do what you really need. The gospel according to Ford.

They're playing that game with more than just the Raptor, the entire industry really is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in other words, you guys are are already getting the F-150 Raptor, and while we know without a doubt that the Ranger Raptor would sell like hotcakes in the US, just shut up and buy what we allow you to buy because we know better than you do what you really need. The gospel according to Ford.

It's the same thing they did with the F150 Raptor--it went on hiatus with the switch to the 13th generation F150 in '15, then was introduced after everything was settled with the main truck.

 

All the evidence, IMHO, points to the Ranger launch being a shoestring project. Ford is putting enough resources behind it that it can be successful, but they're not swinging for the bleachers like they did with the F150. As a result, we're not getting all of the possible cab/bed configurations, wheelbases, powertrain options, or trims/models. We're seeing them go after the higher profit parts of the market first, then, once the Ranger is established as a money maker, we'll see them go after the rest of it.

 

Personally, I'm not sure we'll see the diesel Raptor in the US. I'd expect something like the EB27 with the tap opened up more than it is in the F150, kind of like the difference between the EB35 (F150) and the EB35 HO (Raptor). In that case, it really doesn't make sense to bring the ROW Ranger Raptor here now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the history of the T6 and the fact that it has never had any other engine type than an inline since its inception I'm wondering what the best engine choice would have been if Ford had the ability to design something from scratch rather than rely on existing designs.

 

This might sound a little off the wall but if V-type engines are not an option why not consider an inline six of somewhere between 2.5 and 3.0 liters?

 

An inline six is a more naturally balanced design compared to either an inline four or five cylinder engine. An inline six also has the ability to produce more torque at lower rpm's than a similar displacement V6. Seems like a natural fit for a truck or SUV.

 

They could offer it in both NA and EB versions with the EB reserved for the higher trim levels of the Ranger and Bronco. It would need to have relatively small bores and bore spacing to keep the block compact enough to fit longitudinally in the Ranger engine bay.

 

It would have a 4-valve aluminum DOHC cylinder head with TiVCT and a CGI block for strength. It would also have dual port/direct fuel injection and auto stop/start.

 

If they need help designing it they could probably hire a couple of retired BMW engineers, or better yet, just let the boys in OZ use what they know about inline sixes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the same thing they did with the F150 Raptor--it went on hiatus with the switch to the 13th generation F150 in '15, then was introduced after everything was settled with the main truck.

 

All the evidence, IMHO, points to the Ranger launch being a shoestring project. Ford is putting enough resources behind it that it can be successful, but they're not swinging for the bleachers like they did with the F150. As a result, we're not getting all of the possible cab/bed configurations, wheelbases, powertrain options, or trims/models. We're seeing them go after the higher profit parts of the market first, then, once the Ranger is established as a money maker, we'll see them go after the rest of it.

 

Personally, I'm not sure we'll see the diesel Raptor in the US. I'd expect something like the EB27 with the tap opened up more than it is in the F150, kind of like the difference between the EB35 (F150) and the EB35 HO (Raptor). In that case, it really doesn't make sense to bring the ROW Ranger Raptor here now.

You wont see that diesel in a US spec Ranger Raptor. It would not be acceptable here, as people expect high horsepower engines in performance vehicles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using simple numbers an inline six with 85mm bore x 85mm stroke = 2.894 Liters of displacement. Increasing the stroke to 90mm would result in a displacement of 3.064 Liters. In either case a 95mm bore spacing would result in a block length of somewhere around 600mm or less than 24".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the history of the T6 and the fact that it has never had any other engine type than an inline since its inception I'm wondering what the best engine choice would have been if Ford had the ability to design something from scratch rather than rely on existing designs.

Except we've already been told that the NA Ranger has a different frame to accommodate the powertrains in NA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not until 2021.

 

Just my own theory,

Ford NA came to the T6 development group and wanted a Nth American Ranger,

their timing sucked because the refresh for CY2018 was probably already done with

everything locked in, so the least disruptive engine for Nth America was the 2.3 EB...

Edited by jpd80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im betting NA Ranger Raptor is not unveiled until theyre ready to unveil Bronco Raptor, which will justify the NA Powertrain.

And therefore, it will arrive after Bronco...

 

I'm at a loss with diesel Ranger Raptor, the same chief of Ford performance says the US needs gas engines

while all ROW markets will like the 2.0 twin turbo diesel, what's more he had to mansplain it to journalists

not 24 hours after the launch.......try putting a 3.0 diesel in F150 Raptor and tell American buyers

it's not about the engine...they'd crucify him, yet we have to take this product clearly aimed at Asia.

Edited by jpd80
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...