old_fairmont_wagon Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 Three things killed the Caprice in the US. Price as it was priced much higher than other comparably SIZED vehicles, Availability as often, there were no dealers anywhere near me that even had one to test drive, much less sell, and advertising as I don't believe I've ever seen an ad for the vehicle in anything other than online media, and only then on a handful of websites. From a conversation that I once had with a local Chevrolet salesman, they didn't want to deal with ordering and selling them at all. This is what enthusiasts have come to expect. First, the vehicle isn't offered, then they decide to eventually offer it, but make it so difficult to buy through price and availability, then, once it flops in the market, they point and scream and shout that there are no real enthusiasts and that it was just misguided loyalty to those non-existent enthusiasts that killed the project. And, of course, this completely misses that Fiat-Chrysler continues to move the 300/charger in volume even on ancient platforms with below average dynamics. There is a market, but it does have its limits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 In most cases there really isn't a stand alone business case for the vehicle, that's why the volume is kept low and no advertising. In this case I think they were throwing the Aussies a bone for something else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grbeck Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 Personally, I absolutely shocked that bringing over the rear-wheel-drive vehicle demanded by internet experts who only buy them used hasn't panned out as a profitable venture. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MY93SHO Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 In most cases there really isn't a stand alone business case for the vehicle, that's why the volume is kept low and no advertising. In this case I think they were throwing the Aussies a bone for something else. Didn't they have to fulfill the rest of the agreement from when Pontiac/ G8 went under? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 Didn't they have to fulfill the rest of the agreement from when Pontiac/ G8 went under? jpd80 is the one who posted that info - it may have been to make up for the loss of the G8. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 The SS was restricted to high series cars to limit the numbers to be delivered but with a G8 type line up, it's not hard to see how that trckle would have become 1,500-2,000 a month or double Elizabeth's output , can't have that if you want to close down plants... One final point, GM Shanghai developed Omega using the LWB Zeta as a starting point while, my sources tell me that Holden engineering did similar with evolving a future car off the shorter wheelbase Zeta Commodore and that Elizabeth was also prepped for GM layer build techniques.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
630land Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 On I-294, Chicagoland, is patrolled mostly by Taurus cop cars. But why the SS didn't sell, is it competes with restored "classic" Chevy RWD V8's. The fans say "bring it here", then only buy pickups or SUV's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted January 29, 2017 Share Posted January 29, 2017 (edited) On I-294, Chicagoland, is patrolled mostly by Taurus cop cars. But why the SS didn't sell, is it competes with restored "classic" Chevy RWD V8's. The fans say "bring it here", then only buy pickups or SUV's. The whole Zeta project was an absolute fiasco of on again, off again switches back and forth. Holden was encouraged to make its platform and cars bigger and heavier than it needed to include provison for a Travese sized SUV replacement. After thatw as set in stone, GMNA began backing away from every car opportunity it offered Holden, the only tow it couldn't cancel were Pontiac G8, and Camaro. The Caprice LEV and Chevrolet SS were consolation prizes for Gm renegging on the prize Impala plum in 2008. In hindsight, GM could have agreed to Zeta and built Caprice, Impala and Camaro, then added Buick equivalents, maybe evolved CTS and DTS to Zeta as well... done the whole product cycle and now be moving onto something else. Gotta love dysfunctional GM, Zeta should have replaced Sigma, Alpha and evolved into Omega. This was like going from LA to SFO via NY, totally unnecessary and waste of funding on cars that turned out to be low volume anyway.. Edited January 29, 2017 by jpd80 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fgts Posted January 31, 2017 Author Share Posted January 31, 2017 The whole Zeta project was an absolute fiasco of on again, off again switches back and forth. Holden was encouraged to make its platform and cars bigger and heavier than it needed to include provison for a Travese sized SUV replacement. After thatw as set in stone, GMNA began backing away from every car opportunity it offered Holden, the only tow it couldn't cancel were Pontiac G8, and Camaro. The Caprice LEV and Chevrolet SS were consolation prizes for Gm renegging on the prize Impala plum in 2008. In hindsight, GM could have agreed to Zeta and built Caprice, Impala and Camaro, then added Buick equivalents, maybe evolved CTS and DTS to Zeta as well... done the whole product cycle and now be moving onto something else. Gotta love dysfunctional GM, Zeta should have replaced Sigma, Alpha and evolved into Omega. This was like going from LA to SFO via NY, totally unnecessary and waste of funding on cars that turned out to be low volume anyway.. That sums it up. Originally had GM wised up in 1999-00 and allowed Oldsmobile, Buick and Holden to use Sigma when they requested it instead of "Cadillac exclusive" it would had been less program problems. Eventually Chevy even Pontiac woulda received Sigma. It isn't people don't want a mass market rwd otherwise no Charger or 300 would be on sale. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 That sums it up. Originally had GM wised up in 1999-00 and allowed Oldsmobile, Buick and Holden to use Sigma when they requested it instead of "Cadillac exclusive" it would had been less program problems. Eventually Chevy even Pontiac woulda received Sigma. It isn't people don't want a mass market rwd otherwise no Charger or 300 would be on sale. Sigma was actually begun by Holden as a replacement for the aging V-Car but the requirements expressed by Cadillac actually made the cabin too small for the Commodore and Caprice, so Holden handed that project over to GMNA and began Zeta for itself. Interestingly, Holden's Alpha was basically a narrowed Zeta, maybe why GMNA was terrified of weight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzymoomoo Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 The whole Zeta project was an absolute fiasco of on again, off again switches back and forth. Holden was encouraged to make its platform and cars bigger and heavier than it needed to include provison for a Travese sized SUV replacement. After thatw as set in stone, GMNA began backing away from every car opportunity it offered Holden, the only tow it couldn't cancel were Pontiac G8, and Camaro. The Caprice LEV and Chevrolet SS were consolation prizes for Gm renegging on the prize Impala plum in 2008. In hindsight, GM could have agreed to Zeta and built Caprice, Impala and Camaro, then added Buick equivalents, maybe evolved CTS and DTS to Zeta as well... done the whole product cycle and now be moving onto something else. Gotta love dysfunctional GM, Zeta should have replaced Sigma, Alpha and evolved into Omega. This was like going from LA to SFO via NY, totally unnecessary and waste of funding on cars that turned out to be low volume anyway.. Wasn't that whole mess brought on and managed by Bob Lutz? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzcat Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 Wasn't that whole mess brought on and managed by Bob Lutz? Bob Lutz came on the scene after the Sigma cake was baked for Cadillac, but he was responsible for the reverse course of bring Zeta to the US after the initial decision had been made for NA and AUS to go separate ways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 (edited) Wasn't that whole mess brought on and managed by Bob Lutz? Lutz was definitely in Holden's corner, I can imagine that in his position with product development, that he would have pushing every opportunity for the roll out of what he saw as GM's affordable global RWD. The crazy part was that Zeta was benched over fears of not meeting fuel economy targets even though GM had no toer replacement in sight, preferring to continue with FWD impala - V6 for V6 G8 and Impala were roughly the same weight and fuel economy. The whole thing was a mess, GM overt hought the situation and double backed on itself so many times. In another reality we would have seen mustang, Falcon, Fairlane and Territory all merge under Ford's proposed global RWD...I'm sure. that would have been a strange and surreal product line up to some. Edited February 1, 2017 by jpd80 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvrsvt Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 I saw my first NJSP PIU Monday...guess they are getting them instead of the Caprice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92LX302 Posted February 6, 2017 Share Posted February 6, 2017 If they didn't see this coming, shame on them. I'm sure Ford will make sure the equipment can be transferred. I thought they did that with the current one vs. the CV? Yep. That's why we have a Taurus Interceptor with a foot high halogen light bar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.