Jump to content

Custom Search





2019 Lincoln Aviator Introduced Here !


Welcome to Blue Oval Forums


Sign In  Log in with Facebook

Create Account
Welcome to Blue Oval Forums.  You must first register to create topics and post replies. Registration is a quick and easy process and only takes a minute.  Be apart of Blue Oval Forums by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members
  • Create a photo album and post images
  • Use the Shout feature and more. . .
Click here to create an account now.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

Palin bandwagoneers


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
162 replies to this topic

#21 OFFLINE   4rd4life

4rd4life

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 255 posts
  • Joined 10-October 07
  • Location:Kansas City

Posted 14 September 2008 - 07:15 PM

The republician menbers of the uaw are tired of this smear on Sarah Palen! Why is obama so scared of Palen? Obama should be fighting the top of the ticket. I predict that this election will be close, coming down to the wire. If obama really wants to win, he better come clean on his association with terriorist.


Ok, so we know how your going to vote, her name has has been posted on here and everywhere else 1,000's of times and you cant spell it, maybe if you would of had a community organizer they would have helped you seek an education, so much for Bush's no child left behind.

because even she has more executive experience then he does.

some Palin vs. Obama for ya

http://www.audacityo...s-barack-obama/


ex·ec·u·tive
noun
1. a person or group of persons having administrative or supervisory authority in an organization.
2. the person or persons in whom the supreme executive power of a government is vested.
3. the executive branch of a government.
adjective
4. of, pertaining to, or suited for carrying out plans, duties, etc.: executive ability.
5. pertaining to or charged with the execution of laws and policies or the administration of public affairs: executive appointments; executive committees.
6. designed for, used by, or suitable for executives: an executive suite.

So this would entitle any supervisor at Ford to be President or better yet what about the manager at Mc.Donald's.







Lose this advertisement by becoming a member. Click here to create a free account.


#22 OFFLINE   CSMJ

CSMJ

    Blue Oval Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPip
  • 1,206 posts
  • Joined 12-November 05
  • Location:USA

Posted 15 September 2008 - 07:46 AM

Its sad if you believe she has more so called executive experience.
She was a mayor of a small town. Now a governor of a small state located far away from the rest of the country .

U forget Clinton was gov. of a even smaller state!!!!! :finger: Was he qualified??? He had NO foreign policy experience!!!! :finger: His state was 47th in education when he was gov. :finger:
Obama worked with high school kids in chicago and the grad. rate is alot worse off now then when he started to help!! :finger:

#23 OFFLINE   stephenhawkings

stephenhawkings

    Blue Oval Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPip
  • 1,333 posts
  • Joined 15-February 08

Posted 15 September 2008 - 07:57 AM

U forget Clinton was gov. of a even smaller state!!!!! :finger: Was he qualified??? He had NO foreign policy experience!!!! :finger: His state was 47th in education when he was gov. :finger:
Obama worked with high school kids in chicago and the grad. rate is alot worse off now then when he started to help!! :finger:


i'll give you land mass clintons state was smaller, but as for human beings, alaska is only more populated than north dakota, vermont, and wyoming.

and on the education issue, Arkansas doesn't collect monstorous tax revenue from oil companys or its populace, so their education is in the shitter. but that is hardly suprising when our ferderal tax dollars are only spent in the low single digits towards education, while we spend on 'defense' in iraq about three quarters of those tax dollars.

so yeah education is a big deal, or it should be, if it was we probably wouldn't have all these ignorant threads and could talk abut ford, maybe.
'Death and taxes'

'Be the change you wish to see in the world'

"As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places
will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed." Abe Lincoln

#24 OFFLINE   SheetMetalJoe

SheetMetalJoe

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 86 posts
  • Joined 30-August 06
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 15 September 2008 - 08:04 AM

I just can not believe that grown adults are scared that Obama will enforce the "black value system" or that he will somehow befriend "Terrorists". Do you honestly believe that there wouldn't be a total upheaval of American society if this was to happen?

??????????????????????????????????????????
Posted Image

#25 OFFLINE   StrangeHighways

StrangeHighways

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 70 posts
  • Joined 11-August 07

Posted 15 September 2008 - 01:16 PM

I just can not believe that grown adults are scared that Obama will enforce the "black value system" or that he will somehow befriend "Terrorists". Do you honestly believe that there wouldn't be a total upheaval of American society if this was to happen?

??????????????????????????????????????????

No!!!!! I am afraid he will impose the same Jimmy Carter polices that he says he wants to.He wants to impose HUGE taxes on corporations,news flash,corporations don't pay taxes.They raise the price of goods to the consumer"you" to offset the tax.Do you really believe that the owners of the tobacco companies got out their checkbooks and paid the fines imposed by the government?Hell no they raised the price of the cigarettes.If the corporation can't raise the price of their goods then they layoff workers.Its that simple folks

#26 OFFLINE   badfinger

badfinger

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 60 posts
  • Joined 18-December 05

Posted 15 September 2008 - 01:34 PM

No!!!!! I am afraid he will impose the same Jimmy Carter polices that he says he wants to.He wants to impose HUGE taxes on corporations,news flash,corporations don't pay taxes.They raise the price of goods to the consumer"you" to offset the tax.Do you really believe that the owners of the tobacco companies got out their checkbooks and paid the fines imposed by the government?Hell no they raised the price of the cigarettes.If the corporation can't raise the price of their goods then they layoff workers.Its that simple folks



Say what you want about Carter - but if we had followed the energy policies he left in place when he left office I doubt we would be in the mess we are right now with foriegn oil.

:hysterical: That was like throwing red meat to all you slack jawed drooling right wingers out there :hysterical:

#27 OFFLINE   Indy

Indy

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 187 posts
  • Joined 18-May 06

Posted 15 September 2008 - 03:07 PM

If obama really wants to win, he better come clean on his association with terriorist.


Oh this I've GOT to see.

Please enlighten us about Obama's association with terrorists.

............And please spare us any B.S. about his name.

#28 OFFLINE   truckster

truckster

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 47 posts
  • Joined 20-October 06

Posted 15 September 2008 - 03:13 PM

Ok, so we know how your going to vote, her name has has been posted on here and everywhere else 1,000's of times and you cant spell it, maybe if you would of had a community organizer they would have helped you seek an education, so much for Bush's no child left behind.

I admit I made a mistake on the spelling of her name. As I read your post, I see that your grammer skills are lacking. Great job!!!

ex·ec·u·tive
noun
1. a person or group of persons having administrative or supervisory authority in an organization.
2. the person or persons in whom the supreme executive power of a government is vested.
3. the executive branch of a government.
adjective
4. of, pertaining to, or suited for carrying out plans, duties, etc.: executive ability.
5. pertaining to or charged with the execution of laws and policies or the administration of public affairs: executive appointments; executive committees.
6. designed for, used by, or suitable for executives: an executive suite.

So this would entitle any supervisor at Ford to be President or better yet what about the manager at Mc.Donald's.



#29 OFFLINE   4rd4life

4rd4life

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 255 posts
  • Joined 10-October 07
  • Location:Kansas City

Posted 15 September 2008 - 03:38 PM

No!!!!! I am afraid he will impose the same Jimmy Carter polices that he says he wants to.He wants to impose HUGE taxes on corporations,news flash,corporations don't pay taxes.They raise the price of goods to the consumer"you" to offset the tax.Do you really believe that the owners of the tobacco companies got out their checkbooks and paid the fines imposed by the government?Hell no they raised the price of the cigarettes.If the corporation can't raise the price of their goods then they layoff workers.Its that simple folks


Your wrong and Obama is right! LOL
The high price of tobacco is not the fault of the tobacco industry raising the cost of tobacco products, tobacco products are cheap even when their sold to wholesale distributors blame the rest on federal tax, state tax, county tax, and city tax, and they all want to raise those taxes even more since the population is smoking less, and if you have read or listened to Obama's plan if you are a U.S. company operating and keeping your job's in the U.S. you are rewarded tax breaks, but if you are a U.S. company operating outside of the U.S. you won't, that might bring some of our lost manufacturing job's back home where they belong. The raising of taxes is on personal income and if you don't make over $250,000 a year you have no worries.

#30 OFFLINE   4rd4life

4rd4life

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 255 posts
  • Joined 10-October 07
  • Location:Kansas City

Posted 15 September 2008 - 03:43 PM

Sorry, should have proof read, didn't realize I had "has" twice.

#31 OFFLINE   StrangeHighways

StrangeHighways

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 70 posts
  • Joined 11-August 07

Posted 15 September 2008 - 04:31 PM

Your wrong and Obama is right! LOL
The high price of tobacco is not the fault of the tobacco industry raising the cost of tobacco products, tobacco products are cheap even when their sold to wholesale distributors blame the rest on federal tax, state tax, county tax, and city tax, and they all want to raise those taxes even more since the population is smoking less, and if you have read or listened to Obama's plan if you are a U.S. company operating and keeping your job's in the U.S. you are rewarded tax breaks, but if you are a U.S. company operating outside of the U.S. you won't, that might bring some of our lost manufacturing job's back home where they belong. The raising of taxes is on personal income and if you don't make over $250,000 a year you have no worries.

You did not listen to what Obama said.He said you will pay less then you did under Clinton.Go look at you 10 40 from 1999 and look at 2007 I paid 5k less in 2007.So anything more than now is a tax hike.Or is comprehension>you ?

#32 OFFLINE   4rd4life

4rd4life

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 255 posts
  • Joined 10-October 07
  • Location:Kansas City

Posted 15 September 2008 - 05:49 PM

You did not listen to what Obama said.He said you will pay less then you did under Clinton.Go look at you 10 40 from 1999 and look at 2007 I paid 5k less in 2007.So anything more than now is a tax hike.Or is comprehension>you ?


Get the fact's on their economic issues.

http://www.barackoba...omy/#tax-relief

http://www.johnmccai...rica/relief.htm

#33 OFFLINE   Raws41900

Raws41900

    Blue Oval Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPip
  • 948 posts
  • Joined 13-September 05
  • Location:Michigan
  • Current Vehicle:Ford

Posted 15 September 2008 - 06:03 PM

Ok, so we know how your going to vote, her name has has been posted on here and everywhere else 1,000's of times and you cant spell it, maybe if you would of had a community organizer they would have helped you seek an education, so much for Bush's no child left behind.



ex·ec·u·tive
noun
1. a person or group of persons having administrative or supervisory authority in an organization.
2. the person or persons in whom the supreme executive power of a government is vested.
3. the executive branch of a government.
adjective
4. of, pertaining to, or suited for carrying out plans, duties, etc.: executive ability.
5. pertaining to or charged with the execution of laws and policies or the administration of public affairs: executive appointments; executive committees.
6. designed for, used by, or suitable for executives: an executive suite.

So this would entitle any supervisor at Ford to be President or better yet what about the manager at Mc.Donald's.


way to spin it. you must be a stupid liberal or can't comprehend the other meanings of executive like in examples 2 or 3, which is it?

#34 OFFLINE   4rd4life

4rd4life

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 255 posts
  • Joined 10-October 07
  • Location:Kansas City

Posted 15 September 2008 - 08:48 PM

way to spin it. you must be a stupid liberal or can't comprehend the other meanings of executive like in examples 2 or 3, which is it?


It's a definition, what is example 1 that is the first definition of the word, which is the original meaning of the word, with an intelligence level like yours no wonder they have trouble in Rawsonville.

#35 OFFLINE   theripper

theripper

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 89 posts
  • Joined 07-September 08

Posted 15 September 2008 - 08:57 PM

i love it when hick republicans call liberals stupid. it's so cute.

republicans...people too rich to care and too poor to think.

Attached Files

  • Attached File  o.jpg   24.18KB   2 downloads


#36 OFFLINE   Imawhosure

Imawhosure

    Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,922 posts
  • Joined 07-February 01
  • Location:cornfields of Indiana
  • Current Vehicle:F-350

Posted 15 September 2008 - 09:51 PM

Lets just get it all out there----------->

1. Who screwed the bluecollar worker with allowing NAFTA through when they had the veto power to stop it. In fact, they stumped for it on TV to get it through. GEORGE BUSH? NOT!!!! Bill Clinton, that's who!

2. When the American auto industry and steel industry was in trouble, who put in MECHANISMS to protect them? JIMMY CARTER? NOT!!!!! Ronald Reagan!!!!

3. What party controlled congress while the auto industry was collapsing, and then after it rebounded, allowed it again to collapse due to the price of oil, AND STILL MOANS THAT THEY WON'T DRILL? Republicans? Not!!!! Democrats!!!!

4. What party is for clean coal technology? Dems? Not!!!!!!!! Republicans!

5. Which party voted for a war, and now trys to tell the American people it did no such thing? Republicans? No!!!!! Democrats!

6. Of the two partys, which one wants to add PERMANENT SPENDING that can NEVER BE rescinded? In other words, TAX CUTS can be, but HEALTHCARE CAN't if it doesn't work. You can also stop a war you know, lolol. Would that be the evil republicans? Not!!!!! It is the idiotic democrats!!!!!!!

7. Taking the two candidates into consideration, which one points towards CUTTING SPENDING, instead of just spending the money on programs they see as more worthy of the money? Would that be the democrat? Not! It is the republican candidate!

8. Of the two candidates, which one has an inferiority complex so bad, he didn't even like his name? Would that be John? NOT!!!!! No, that would be BARRY................who is NOT even thinking in a MUSLIM way, but changed his name to Barack......Hussein. Go figure, I can't, but you gotta admit, kinda strange to say the least if you are not gonna wash it away with typical PC bullshit.

9. Which party and candidate, had the nerve to put up a woman for the one of the highest offices in this land? Would it be the democrats who had a stellar choice of a woman who commanded almost 50% of the primary vote? ohhhh, contrair, lolol!!!!!! They gotta keep the little women in the kitchen baking cookies. The REPUBLICANS bought forth a woman to fight against these EXPERIENCED politicians, and just cause women like her, you don't appreciate it! Where is Hillary? Why did you KICK her to the curb?!?!?!?!?! Are you now going to kick Joe to the curb to show you are all inclusive, lolol.

10. Which candidate of the 4, had the nerve to stand against not only the other party, but their own, defeat them both, and fix things that were broken? Obama? LOLOLOLOL, he can't even stand up to Mayor Daley, or Todd Stroger. In fact, Jesse Jackson hasn't finished with him yet. Joe Biden? A typical lifetime political hack who goes along to get along. John Mcain? Well, at least he crosses over from side to side when he sees a better deal for all Americans. But FARRAH Sarah----------->that is the one who gave to shits less, and threw her own party out to fix the problem.

It is no wonder Barack; just like the rest of you are scared to death. You can put up with republicans cause they will make a deal, but Sarah; she won't do it!!!!!!!!! Know what else, lolol. She will go to the women of America and empower them while she explains how they, and their children, are getting screwed over. As we can see, she will energize them, and you liberals just can't stand that, can you.

A pig with LIPSTICK will fix it, and all the men who argue over THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE, will no longer have a say. It will be those who NEED to decide about that right, along with IF we need more oil, and IF national healthcare for trillions is worth it, and you arrogant liberals don't like it, lolol.

You shoulda chose the political BITCH my friends, instead of the inexperienced woos. You have no answer to this problem, and the only hope you have is that Mcain does not run for a second term, because after Mcain, Palin WILL BE ELECTED. She will get Mcain in this time, and then grow into the job. A much better resume than being FIRST LADY, don't you think?!?!?!?!?!

A script could NOT have been written that was more fortuitous than this!!!!!!!!!!!
Vladimir Putin decided to show the world how tough he is, so invaded the Crimea. Not to be outdone..... Barack, Hussein, Obysmal, one uped him and invaded Clark County, Nevada showing his ferocity by threatening to kill some cows!

#37 OFFLINE   Mark B. Morrow

Mark B. Morrow

    Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 8,049 posts
  • Joined 02-March 05
  • Location:Pittsburgh, PA (Steeler City)
  • Current Vehicle:2006 Eddie Bauer Explorer (5th EB Explorer)

Posted 15 September 2008 - 10:12 PM

In case you haven't noticed Sarah Palin is old news. The stock market took a 504 point dump today because of the policies put into place by the Republican Congress and supported by W and McCain. McCain's economic brain Phil Gramm was the architect of the Enron Loophole and the deregulation of investment banking that have led us to where we are today.

It's the economy stupid. Everything else is just a distraction.

'64 1/2 Mustang Convertible - 289 5 speed restomod
'66 T-Bird Convertible - restored
'06 Explorer Eddie Bauer - Dark Cherry Metallic and Pueblo Gold (My 5th EB Explorer)

I Disagree With You...But I'm Pretty Sure You're Not Hitler.
- Jon Stewart


PITTSBURGH CITY OF CHAMPIONS-PITTSBURGH STEELERS - SUPER BOWL IX, X, XII, XIV, XL, XLIII CHAMPIONS--PITTSBURGH PENGUINS - 1991, 1992, 2009 & 2016 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS and the PITTSBURGH PIRATES WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS 1909, 1960, 1971 & 1979 and now - After  20 consecutive losing seasons: a contender. (I hope)

Pittsburgh Vintage Grand Prix  July 7-16, 2017  www.pvgp.org


#38 OFFLINE   theripper

theripper

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 89 posts
  • Joined 07-September 08

Posted 15 September 2008 - 10:12 PM

ima, you are a raving lunatic. you need a fact checker and some sedatives. from that half hour long rant, you have conjured up images of the republicans as great saviors of the american way. on the contrary, if we keep on with the current republican way of life, we'll be at war for another millenium, probably with more countries that DON'T have anything to do with terrorism.

think about it...the biggest tax increase the world has ever known comes in the form of paying billions of dollars a month for a war. thanks george and company!

what will sarah do?

she'll make sure we all believe in HER idea of god. she talks about it every time she gets a chance. you know, there are other religious zealots we know all too much about (muslim extremists) who want us to bow down to THEIR god, too. religious extremism, christian or otherwise, is scary. therefore, palin is scary too.

palin can keep her extemism in her home state. let's just hope the republican lemmings aren't so starstruck by a tough talking pro-lifer that they don't see the real danger of putting her anywhere near the whitehouse.

Attached Files

  • Attached File  o.jpg   24.18KB   0 downloads


#39 OFFLINE   4rd4life

4rd4life

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 255 posts
  • Joined 10-October 07
  • Location:Kansas City

Posted 15 September 2008 - 10:13 PM

Lets just get it all out there----------->

1. Who screwed the bluecollar worker with allowing NAFTA through when they had the veto power to stop it. In fact, they stumped for it on TV to get it through. GEORGE BUSH? NOT!!!! Bill Clinton, that's who!

2. When the American auto industry and steel industry was in trouble, who put in MECHANISMS to protect them? JIMMY CARTER? NOT!!!!! Ronald Reagan!!!!

3. What party controlled congress while the auto industry was collapsing, and then after it rebounded, allowed it again to collapse due to the price of oil, AND STILL MOANS THAT THEY WON'T DRILL? Republicans? Not!!!! Democrats!!!!

4. What party is for clean coal technology? Dems? Not!!!!!!!! Republicans!

5. Which party voted for a war, and now trys to tell the American people it did no such thing? Republicans? No!!!!! Democrats!

6. Of the two partys, which one wants to add PERMANENT SPENDING that can NEVER BE rescinded? In other words, TAX CUTS can be, but HEALTHCARE CAN't if it doesn't work. You can also stop a war you know, lolol. Would that be the evil republicans? Not!!!!! It is the idiotic democrats!!!!!!!

7. Taking the two candidates into consideration, which one points towards CUTTING SPENDING, instead of just spending the money on programs they see as more worthy of the money? Would that be the democrat? Not! It is the republican candidate!

8. Of the two candidates, which one has an inferiority complex so bad, he didn't even like his name? Would that be John? NOT!!!!! No, that would be BARRY................who is NOT even thinking in a MUSLIM way, but changed his name to Barack......Hussein. Go figure, I can't, but you gotta admit, kinda strange to say the least if you are not gonna wash it away with typical PC bullshit.

9. Which party and candidate, had the nerve to put up a woman for the one of the highest offices in this land? Would it be the democrats who had a stellar choice of a woman who commanded almost 50% of the primary vote? ohhhh, contrair, lolol!!!!!! They gotta keep the little women in the kitchen baking cookies. The REPUBLICANS bought forth a woman to fight against these EXPERIENCED politicians, and just cause women like her, you don't appreciate it! Where is Hillary? Why did you KICK her to the curb?!?!?!?!?! Are you now going to kick Joe to the curb to show you are all inclusive, lolol.

10. Which candidate of the 4, had the nerve to stand against not only the other party, but their own, defeat them both, and fix things that were broken? Obama? LOLOLOLOL, he can't even stand up to Mayor Daley, or Todd Stroger. In fact, Jesse Jackson hasn't finished with him yet. Joe Biden? A typical lifetime political hack who goes along to get along. John Mcain? Well, at least he crosses over from side to side when he sees a better deal for all Americans. But FARRAH Sarah----------->that is the one who gave to shits less, and threw her own party out to fix the problem.

It is no wonder Barack; just like the rest of you are scared to death. You can put up with republicans cause they will make a deal, but Sarah; she won't do it!!!!!!!!! Know what else, lolol. She will go to the women of America and empower them while she explains how they, and their children, are getting screwed over. As we can see, she will energize them, and you liberals just can't stand that, can you.

A pig with LIPSTICK will fix it, and all the men who argue over THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE, will no longer have a say. It will be those who NEED to decide about that right, along with IF we need more oil, and IF national healthcare for trillions is worth it, and you arrogant liberals don't like it, lolol.

You shoulda chose the political BITCH my friends, instead of the inexperienced woos. You have no answer to this problem, and the only hope you have is that Mcain does not run for a second term, because after Mcain, Palin WILL BE ELECTED. She will get Mcain in this time, and then grow into the job. A much better resume than being FIRST LADY, don't you think?!?!?!?!?!

A script could NOT have been written that was more fortuitous than this!!!!!!!!!!!



:bowdown: :violin: :beatdeadhorse:

#40 OFFLINE   local400future

local400future

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 398 posts
  • Joined 21-February 08

Posted 15 September 2008 - 11:40 PM

:bowdown: :violin: :beatdeadhorse:


:ohsnap:








Custom Search


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Privacy Policy Terms of Service | DMCA ·