Jump to content

New Facebook Pages

Ford Mach E

Ford Thunder

  • Custom Search


Sign in to follow this  
jerseyshore

Palin bandwagoneers

Recommended Posts

No!!!!! I am afraid he will impose the same Jimmy Carter polices that he says he wants to.He wants to impose HUGE taxes on corporations,news flash,corporations don't pay taxes.They raise the price of goods to the consumer"you" to offset the tax.Do you really believe that the owners of the tobacco companies got out their checkbooks and paid the fines imposed by the government?Hell no they raised the price of the cigarettes.If the corporation can't raise the price of their goods then they layoff workers.Its that simple folks

 

 

Say what you want about Carter - but if we had followed the energy policies he left in place when he left office I doubt we would be in the mess we are right now with foriegn oil.

 

:hysterical: That was like throwing red meat to all you slack jawed drooling right wingers out there :hysterical:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If obama really wants to win, he better come clean on his association with terriorist.

 

Oh this I've GOT to see.

 

Please enlighten us about Obama's association with terrorists.

 

............And please spare us any B.S. about his name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, so we know how your going to vote, her name has has been posted on here and everywhere else 1,000's of times and you cant spell it, maybe if you would of had a community organizer they would have helped you seek an education, so much for Bush's no child left behind.

 

I admit I made a mistake on the spelling of her name. As I read your post, I see that your grammer skills are lacking. Great job!!!

 

ex·ec·u·tive

noun

1. a person or group of persons having administrative or supervisory authority in an organization.

2. the person or persons in whom the supreme executive power of a government is vested.

3. the executive branch of a government.

adjective

4. of, pertaining to, or suited for carrying out plans, duties, etc.: executive ability.

5. pertaining to or charged with the execution of laws and policies or the administration of public affairs: executive appointments; executive committees.

6. designed for, used by, or suitable for executives: an executive suite.

 

So this would entitle any supervisor at Ford to be President or better yet what about the manager at Mc.Donald's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No!!!!! I am afraid he will impose the same Jimmy Carter polices that he says he wants to.He wants to impose HUGE taxes on corporations,news flash,corporations don't pay taxes.They raise the price of goods to the consumer"you" to offset the tax.Do you really believe that the owners of the tobacco companies got out their checkbooks and paid the fines imposed by the government?Hell no they raised the price of the cigarettes.If the corporation can't raise the price of their goods then they layoff workers.Its that simple folks

 

Your wrong and Obama is right! LOL

The high price of tobacco is not the fault of the tobacco industry raising the cost of tobacco products, tobacco products are cheap even when their sold to wholesale distributors blame the rest on federal tax, state tax, county tax, and city tax, and they all want to raise those taxes even more since the population is smoking less, and if you have read or listened to Obama's plan if you are a U.S. company operating and keeping your job's in the U.S. you are rewarded tax breaks, but if you are a U.S. company operating outside of the U.S. you won't, that might bring some of our lost manufacturing job's back home where they belong. The raising of taxes is on personal income and if you don't make over $250,000 a year you have no worries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, should have proof read, didn't realize I had "has" twice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your wrong and Obama is right! LOL

The high price of tobacco is not the fault of the tobacco industry raising the cost of tobacco products, tobacco products are cheap even when their sold to wholesale distributors blame the rest on federal tax, state tax, county tax, and city tax, and they all want to raise those taxes even more since the population is smoking less, and if you have read or listened to Obama's plan if you are a U.S. company operating and keeping your job's in the U.S. you are rewarded tax breaks, but if you are a U.S. company operating outside of the U.S. you won't, that might bring some of our lost manufacturing job's back home where they belong. The raising of taxes is on personal income and if you don't make over $250,000 a year you have no worries.

You did not listen to what Obama said.He said you will pay less then you did under Clinton.Go look at you 10 40 from 1999 and look at 2007 I paid 5k less in 2007.So anything more than now is a tax hike.Or is comprehension>you ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You did not listen to what Obama said.He said you will pay less then you did under Clinton.Go look at you 10 40 from 1999 and look at 2007 I paid 5k less in 2007.So anything more than now is a tax hike.Or is comprehension>you ?

 

Get the fact's on their economic issues.

 

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/economy/#tax-relief

 

http://www.johnmccain.com/Issues/JobsforAmerica/relief.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, so we know how your going to vote, her name has has been posted on here and everywhere else 1,000's of times and you cant spell it, maybe if you would of had a community organizer they would have helped you seek an education, so much for Bush's no child left behind.

 

 

 

ex·ec·u·tive

noun

1. a person or group of persons having administrative or supervisory authority in an organization.

2. the person or persons in whom the supreme executive power of a government is vested.

3. the executive branch of a government.

adjective

4. of, pertaining to, or suited for carrying out plans, duties, etc.: executive ability.

5. pertaining to or charged with the execution of laws and policies or the administration of public affairs: executive appointments; executive committees.

6. designed for, used by, or suitable for executives: an executive suite.

 

So this would entitle any supervisor at Ford to be President or better yet what about the manager at Mc.Donald's.

 

way to spin it. you must be a stupid liberal or can't comprehend the other meanings of executive like in examples 2 or 3, which is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
way to spin it. you must be a stupid liberal or can't comprehend the other meanings of executive like in examples 2 or 3, which is it?

 

It's a definition, what is example 1 that is the first definition of the word, which is the original meaning of the word, with an intelligence level like yours no wonder they have trouble in Rawsonville.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i love it when hick republicans call liberals stupid. it's so cute.

 

republicans...people too rich to care and too poor to think.

post-34404-1221530268_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets just get it all out there----------->

 

1. Who screwed the bluecollar worker with allowing NAFTA through when they had the veto power to stop it. In fact, they stumped for it on TV to get it through. GEORGE BUSH? NOT!!!! Bill Clinton, that's who!

 

2. When the American auto industry and steel industry was in trouble, who put in MECHANISMS to protect them? JIMMY CARTER? NOT!!!!! Ronald Reagan!!!!

 

3. What party controlled congress while the auto industry was collapsing, and then after it rebounded, allowed it again to collapse due to the price of oil, AND STILL MOANS THAT THEY WON'T DRILL? Republicans? Not!!!! Democrats!!!!

 

4. What party is for clean coal technology? Dems? Not!!!!!!!! Republicans!

 

5. Which party voted for a war, and now trys to tell the American people it did no such thing? Republicans? No!!!!! Democrats!

 

6. Of the two partys, which one wants to add PERMANENT SPENDING that can NEVER BE rescinded? In other words, TAX CUTS can be, but HEALTHCARE CAN't if it doesn't work. You can also stop a war you know, lolol. Would that be the evil republicans? Not!!!!! It is the idiotic democrats!!!!!!!

 

7. Taking the two candidates into consideration, which one points towards CUTTING SPENDING, instead of just spending the money on programs they see as more worthy of the money? Would that be the democrat? Not! It is the republican candidate!

 

8. Of the two candidates, which one has an inferiority complex so bad, he didn't even like his name? Would that be John? NOT!!!!! No, that would be BARRY................who is NOT even thinking in a MUSLIM way, but changed his name to Barack......Hussein. Go figure, I can't, but you gotta admit, kinda strange to say the least if you are not gonna wash it away with typical PC bullshit.

 

9. Which party and candidate, had the nerve to put up a woman for the one of the highest offices in this land? Would it be the democrats who had a stellar choice of a woman who commanded almost 50% of the primary vote? ohhhh, contrair, lolol!!!!!! They gotta keep the little women in the kitchen baking cookies. The REPUBLICANS bought forth a woman to fight against these EXPERIENCED politicians, and just cause women like her, you don't appreciate it! Where is Hillary? Why did you KICK her to the curb?!?!?!?!?! Are you now going to kick Joe to the curb to show you are all inclusive, lolol.

 

10. Which candidate of the 4, had the nerve to stand against not only the other party, but their own, defeat them both, and fix things that were broken? Obama? LOLOLOLOL, he can't even stand up to Mayor Daley, or Todd Stroger. In fact, Jesse Jackson hasn't finished with him yet. Joe Biden? A typical lifetime political hack who goes along to get along. John Mcain? Well, at least he crosses over from side to side when he sees a better deal for all Americans. But FARRAH Sarah----------->that is the one who gave to shits less, and threw her own party out to fix the problem.

 

It is no wonder Barack; just like the rest of you are scared to death. You can put up with republicans cause they will make a deal, but Sarah; she won't do it!!!!!!!!! Know what else, lolol. She will go to the women of America and empower them while she explains how they, and their children, are getting screwed over. As we can see, she will energize them, and you liberals just can't stand that, can you.

 

A pig with LIPSTICK will fix it, and all the men who argue over THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE, will no longer have a say. It will be those who NEED to decide about that right, along with IF we need more oil, and IF national healthcare for trillions is worth it, and you arrogant liberals don't like it, lolol.

 

You shoulda chose the political BITCH my friends, instead of the inexperienced woos. You have no answer to this problem, and the only hope you have is that Mcain does not run for a second term, because after Mcain, Palin WILL BE ELECTED. She will get Mcain in this time, and then grow into the job. A much better resume than being FIRST LADY, don't you think?!?!?!?!?!

 

A script could NOT have been written that was more fortuitous than this!!!!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In case you haven't noticed Sarah Palin is old news. The stock market took a 504 point dump today because of the policies put into place by the Republican Congress and supported by W and McCain. McCain's economic brain Phil Gramm was the architect of the Enron Loophole and the deregulation of investment banking that have led us to where we are today.

 

It's the economy stupid. Everything else is just a distraction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ima, you are a raving lunatic. you need a fact checker and some sedatives. from that half hour long rant, you have conjured up images of the republicans as great saviors of the american way. on the contrary, if we keep on with the current republican way of life, we'll be at war for another millenium, probably with more countries that DON'T have anything to do with terrorism.

 

think about it...the biggest tax increase the world has ever known comes in the form of paying billions of dollars a month for a war. thanks george and company!

 

what will sarah do?

 

she'll make sure we all believe in HER idea of god. she talks about it every time she gets a chance. you know, there are other religious zealots we know all too much about (muslim extremists) who want us to bow down to THEIR god, too. religious extremism, christian or otherwise, is scary. therefore, palin is scary too.

 

palin can keep her extemism in her home state. let's just hope the republican lemmings aren't so starstruck by a tough talking pro-lifer that they don't see the real danger of putting her anywhere near the whitehouse.

post-34404-1221534747_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lets just get it all out there----------->

 

1. Who screwed the bluecollar worker with allowing NAFTA through when they had the veto power to stop it. In fact, they stumped for it on TV to get it through. GEORGE BUSH? NOT!!!! Bill Clinton, that's who!

 

2. When the American auto industry and steel industry was in trouble, who put in MECHANISMS to protect them? JIMMY CARTER? NOT!!!!! Ronald Reagan!!!!

 

3. What party controlled congress while the auto industry was collapsing, and then after it rebounded, allowed it again to collapse due to the price of oil, AND STILL MOANS THAT THEY WON'T DRILL? Republicans? Not!!!! Democrats!!!!

 

4. What party is for clean coal technology? Dems? Not!!!!!!!! Republicans!

 

5. Which party voted for a war, and now trys to tell the American people it did no such thing? Republicans? No!!!!! Democrats!

 

6. Of the two partys, which one wants to add PERMANENT SPENDING that can NEVER BE rescinded? In other words, TAX CUTS can be, but HEALTHCARE CAN't if it doesn't work. You can also stop a war you know, lolol. Would that be the evil republicans? Not!!!!! It is the idiotic democrats!!!!!!!

 

7. Taking the two candidates into consideration, which one points towards CUTTING SPENDING, instead of just spending the money on programs they see as more worthy of the money? Would that be the democrat? Not! It is the republican candidate!

 

8. Of the two candidates, which one has an inferiority complex so bad, he didn't even like his name? Would that be John? NOT!!!!! No, that would be BARRY................who is NOT even thinking in a MUSLIM way, but changed his name to Barack......Hussein. Go figure, I can't, but you gotta admit, kinda strange to say the least if you are not gonna wash it away with typical PC bullshit.

 

9. Which party and candidate, had the nerve to put up a woman for the one of the highest offices in this land? Would it be the democrats who had a stellar choice of a woman who commanded almost 50% of the primary vote? ohhhh, contrair, lolol!!!!!! They gotta keep the little women in the kitchen baking cookies. The REPUBLICANS bought forth a woman to fight against these EXPERIENCED politicians, and just cause women like her, you don't appreciate it! Where is Hillary? Why did you KICK her to the curb?!?!?!?!?! Are you now going to kick Joe to the curb to show you are all inclusive, lolol.

 

10. Which candidate of the 4, had the nerve to stand against not only the other party, but their own, defeat them both, and fix things that were broken? Obama? LOLOLOLOL, he can't even stand up to Mayor Daley, or Todd Stroger. In fact, Jesse Jackson hasn't finished with him yet. Joe Biden? A typical lifetime political hack who goes along to get along. John Mcain? Well, at least he crosses over from side to side when he sees a better deal for all Americans. But FARRAH Sarah----------->that is the one who gave to shits less, and threw her own party out to fix the problem.

 

It is no wonder Barack; just like the rest of you are scared to death. You can put up with republicans cause they will make a deal, but Sarah; she won't do it!!!!!!!!! Know what else, lolol. She will go to the women of America and empower them while she explains how they, and their children, are getting screwed over. As we can see, she will energize them, and you liberals just can't stand that, can you.

 

A pig with LIPSTICK will fix it, and all the men who argue over THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE, will no longer have a say. It will be those who NEED to decide about that right, along with IF we need more oil, and IF national healthcare for trillions is worth it, and you arrogant liberals don't like it, lolol.

 

You shoulda chose the political BITCH my friends, instead of the inexperienced woos. You have no answer to this problem, and the only hope you have is that Mcain does not run for a second term, because after Mcain, Palin WILL BE ELECTED. She will get Mcain in this time, and then grow into the job. A much better resume than being FIRST LADY, don't you think?!?!?!?!?!

 

A script could NOT have been written that was more fortuitous than this!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

:bowdown: :violin: :beatdeadhorse:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's a definition, what is example 1 that is the first definition of the word, which is the original meaning of the word, with an intelligence level like yours no wonder they have trouble in Rawsonville.

 

It's 1 definition, not the only one. and in the case it's being used we all know the definition that is being used, well those of us with any sense.

Your dumb ass spins it to use the first one so you can make your lame ass argument that a McDonald's worker could be president.. with your logic no wonder fomoco is in trouble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i love it when hick republicans call liberals stupid. it's so cute.

 

republicans...people too rich to care and too poor to think.

 

i love it when someone calls someone a stupid liberal, then some inbred dummycrap calls them a republican it's so cute.

i'm don't align myself with only one party, i'll vote for a democrat or republican, depending on which one i believe is going to do the best job, not because i was programmed by someone to vote for one party everytime. crazy thinking i know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ima, you are a raving lunatic. you need a fact checker and some sedatives. from that half hour long rant, you have conjured up images of the republicans as great saviors of the american way. on the contrary, if we keep on with the current republican way of life, we'll be at war for another millenium, probably with more countries that DON'T have anything to do with terrorism.

 

think about it...the biggest tax increase the world has ever known comes in the form of paying billions of dollars a month for a war. thanks george and company!

 

what will sarah do?

 

she'll make sure we all believe in HER idea of god. she talks about it every time she gets a chance. you know, there are other religious zealots we know all too much about (muslim extremists) who want us to bow down to THEIR god, too. religious extremism, christian or otherwise, is scary. therefore, palin is scary too.

 

palin can keep her extemism in her home state. let's just hope the republican lemmings aren't so starstruck by a tough talking pro-lifer that they don't see the real danger of putting her anywhere near the whitehouse.

 

If Clinton had taken out Bin Laden when he had the chance would we even have had to deal with war right now? would 9-11 have happend? probably not.

 

she'll make sure we all believe in HER idea of god? really? bush and damn near every president before him mentions god, they must be extremists too. talk about taking an idea and running with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, RAWS, she is a lunatic, and a complete hypocrite. anyone who uses god's name to do their dirty work is a lunatic, and anyone who preaches one thing and does another is a hypocrite.

 

i figured since you're into word games you may need some help. maybe you're a short bus rider.

 

if clinton did this, if clinton did that...hmmm. you bought that republican story hook, line, and sinker. we can all just picture clinton and bin laden having lunch at mcdonald's together. :hysterical:

 

too bad the republican regimes CREATED such animosity through aggressive foreign policy.

 

the country is in financial shambles, we're at war with the wrong country, we still can't get control of the oil situation, and you're STILL defending the party that gave us all that. now THAT's a dumbass for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If Clinton had taken out Bin Laden when he had the chance would we even have had to deal with war right now? would 9-11 have happend? probably not.

 

she'll make sure we all believe in HER idea of god? really? bush and damn near every president before him mentions god, they must be extremists too. talk about taking an idea and running with it.

Jesus freaks and religious zealots are narrow- minded scary people. Do you really want another President who talks to God? I prefer mine to talk to experts, and not go with his gut on policy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Palin is under attack precisely because she shares values and beliefs with a large number of Americans, which is precisely what scares the media elite. In their mind, the "unwashed masses" are all victims who need their superior intellect to survive.

 

Palin scares them because she is exactly like a large number of Americans in values, lifestyle, etc. That is someone who cannot be allowed to rise up into the ruling class.

 

One other thing, would you rather live in a place like Alaska or Arizona, or someplace like the South Side of Chicago, or Wilmington, DE? Victims, please move to Chicago and Delaware, and I'll head off to Alaska to make my own life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If Clinton had taken out Bin Laden when he had the chance would we even have had to deal with war right now? would 9-11 have happend? probably not.

If Regan wouldn't of backed him initially he probably would of never been able to do anything in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never met a Conservative under the age of 20 who had a heart.

 

Never met a Liberal over the age of 30 who had a brain.

 

 

Eventually you just outgrow failed Liberal ideas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And without american help the muhajadeen would of been wiped out and the russians could have taken that shithole. Guess where the price of oil would be now, or ussr might not have fallen.

 

Would of

could of

should of

 

It's all inter-related, "what if"' is for armchair quarterbacks who have 20-20 hindsight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Really? The New York Liberal Rag Times doesn't like Sarah Palin. What a shock!!! LOL Seriously if the NY Times hadn't done some crappy hit piece on Sarah Palin I'd be worried. There will be more such pieces from the NY Times I assure you. This is the same paper that refused to print an OpEd piece by John McCain under the lame excuse that it wasn't up to snuff. They said ..

 

"It would be terrific to have an article from Sen. McCain that mirrors Sen. Obama's piece.

 

In other words, "If it was written by a damn liberal we would print it." The NY Times is a soap box / mouthpiece for liberalism. The more they attack Sarah Palin the more we will vote for her. I hope it drives them stark raving bat shit that shs is so popular. I'm so sick of this notion that liberals from places like New York and LA have that you must be from a big city to know anything about anything. Bad news libs, there are a lot of smart people that actually know a hell of a lot more about running a country than a bunch of self preening, starbucks drinking big city liberal elitists.

 

The NY Times can co go straight to hell for all I care. You want to talk about dangerous politics. Dangerous is when you are already forking nearly 50% of your income to the government in taxes of one form or another and Barrack Obama tells you that's not enough, he needs more, to the tune of 1 trillion dollars, and there are people that think that's a good idea. That's dangerous. Dangerous and stupid. We have a corrupt government that wastes hundreds of billions of dollars a year. It is the biggest transfer of wealth from the poor / middle class to the wealthy in human history and our government is the conduit through which it happens. They take it from us, and give it to them. Barracks plan? He wants more of your money. That's change? Yeah I guess so, change is all you'll have left in your pocket when he gets done. I thought you liberals were supposed to be smart?

Edited by BlackHorse

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×