SteelyD

This Forum wouldn't exist if you didn't have all the speculation and opinion. The Mach E is stirring up the same BS because Ford used the Mustang moniker. Ford's growth and advancement will succeed with Farley.

Why would Ford need to replace the cab? The design is driven by Super Duty decisions anyway.

80 hour work weeks fixing Hackets screw ups.

Farley is all in.

Why?

Saw the Maverick in person Saturday at a Ford sponsored event. Sat in it as well. I like it. Just the right height for driver and passenger entry and exit. The Bed was easily acessable too.

No over heating problems have been reported to Ford.

I don't have an opinion on med duty air brakes. Fleet sales might know what fleet owners may want.

The aftermarket is looking at it. Some have contacted Powertrain Engineering for drawings. Rumor has it that Brodix has heads and an intake manifold in the design stage. They stated that the Ford intake manifold was very good. They worked hard to design an improved manifold.

Too much petty bickering over nothing. At Powertrain I work with adults. Not many here. Take off your rose colored glasses.

Very true here.

The Maverick will have broader market appeal than a Bronco pick up. This is why Ford chose not to build a Bronco pick up.

They sure have. Powertrain engineers like the screw rotor design too.

Many on the GT engineering team like the 7.3 over the 5.2 because it is a narrower engine is easier to package.