Justdatdude

You can't buy a Chevy Silverado ev for 40k the quote explained that.

"Two trim levels will be available to start. The prices Chevy is quoting—$105,000 for the fully loaded RST on display, and $39,900 for the base and fleet-oriented WT—don't include destination, which is $1695 on the current non-electric Silverado. Chevy says these two prices represent the bookends of the Silverado EV pricing spectrum and that upcoming trim levels will fall between" What's not 100k? I mean the Lightning will be almost 100k why wouldn't this be? My point is that most people will prefer the look of the Hummer over the Silverado imo, especially since the body is so similar. Chevy went too round on the front end for me.

I didn't see where a retail version was 40k that's the work truck which won't be an option for everyone. The RST is essentially the Hummer truck

The front end design for Chevy's EVs are objectively ugly, over styled and boring. I like it overall but that lightbar has to go. Ford doesn't have much to worry about, this truck won't sell well because the Hummer looks better for the same price.

What if they held off on an announcement to offer a version of the alleged raptor r engine? I hope there is a more powerful option because this is what killed the second generation Navigator, imo.

So why are they considering standalone stores for 2 models and their variants?

Cadillac's design is never really unattractive but it's never good. ?

I really tried to like this but the proportions ruined what should've been the easiest SUV to design. This is going to be the Commander all over again.

Tesla can't even keep the bumpers and windows on the car in normal driving and that's one thing Ford and other automakers don't have a problem with. The bronco sport has never been marketed as a TRUE off reader (look at the promo videos) but Tesla has said they sell full self driving, which they don't. This should not be a point the finger moment because even none car people believe that if they get a Tesla they can be driven without any input, hence the many people who died from sleeping while "Autopilot" was on.

I haven't heard anything on Math being called racist, so that sounds like a strawman or a comedy article to get right leaning people upset. I'm not disagreeing that people make issues out of things but so do the people responding to something that has no impact on them. Everything isn't racist but if you're only complaining about people of another race's perspective then, you may be. None of that matters in this particular story as the Cherokee nation said they don't want to be associated with an SUV. No one said it was about race. So it's a causation of society because the Cherokee nation no longer wants to be associated with a Jeep suv? People can't decide for themselves what they like an dislike without it being a problem because you like it? If the name in itself is not responsible for their success then why not change it?

Anytime it's not a certain group leading a charge to go against societal norms this site and most of the people writes it off as something unnecessary. A lot of the things that you agree on or hold as beliefs are unnecessary but it's how society was ran. We're not about stay the same just because you don't like it, a lot of people don't like what you like. Get over it. Who cares if it's about money no one on here is spending Stellantis' money nor are you involved in what the Cherokee Nation's finances are. It's stupid to think a corporate conglomerate is supposed to use a name, that was already in use before they used it, for free. The fact that it needed a blessing says it all or they would've went through the court system to gain the rights to use it. Also the confederacy having statues doesn't educate anyone on the history of this country nor does it erase it just because you don't reference it in everyday society. The easiest way to learn is to actually read multiple sources but Americans always want an easy way to do things.

We've reached the end of ICEs and some of you need to get over that. I love V8s and the sound of gas engines but we're stuck in the house losing jobs because of a weird virus that may have to do with the effects of climate change (see ice caps melting effects) . I do think it's time for those who have lived their youth to take a backseat.

I love the way this looks definitely a good blend of design cues from the original and the Bronco 2. This makes me believe there might be a bigger full size Bronco in the works based on the perceived size. Does anyone have any idea if this will be under 30k starting or a little over? As I was typing this I read the news about the cancelled event. Hopefully they can do a Livestream controlled event a little later this month to finally reveal the Bronco and it's specs.

The profile isn't beautiful or sexy. The car is nice and was way better than MKS but it was still a stubby hood FWD car. They NEED a RWD car to solidify their brand ethos in a lower volume halo car.

I hope that's the case because Lincoln needs a beautiful car to make the brand aspirational..I believe the CUVs would sell even better with a A7 type car to put the brand in front of enthusiast.