sprinter

WTH? We still trash talking the KING on here? Merry Christmas all. And pray that Barry Soetoro's AKA Barack HUSSEIN Obama Muslim friends don't attack the CITIZENS of the United States of America on Christmas or New Years Eve.

And this is how we will end up by spending more and more http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=germany+hyperinflation&qs=n&form=QBIR&pq=germany+hyperinflation&sc=8-22&sp=-1&sk=

Forget the cheap paint. Put down ceramic tile

Black Marines: Cliven Bundy Is Not Racist http://www.infowars.com/black-marines-cliven-bundy-is-not-racist/ A black marine who sides with Nevada cattle rancher Cliven Bundy in his dispute with the BLM has posted a diatribe on Facebook defending Bundy’s comments and slamming the corporate media’s coverage as a race baiting distortion designed to create social division. In his missive, a marine going by the handle Charlie Delta blames the “liberal media” for attempting to paint Bundy as a racist, and says he himself has also wondered “the same about the decline of the black family.” Delta admits Bundy is “maybe not so tactful” and is “not an orator,” but that “he definitely isn’t – a racist.” He defends Bundy’s comments as being his own perspective, which he is entitled to. Read his comments below: The media distorts information to the point of social division. This is a photo of myself and the resilient, often charismatic, and maybe not so tactful Cliven Bundy. He’s a cowboy and a helluva family man, not an orator. One thing he definitely isn’t – a racist. I found his comments to not only be NOT racist, but his own view of his experiences. Who the heck are we to determine another man’s perspective on the world around him?! Just because Picasso’s view of the world was abstract, does it negate the fact that his art was genuine? Furthermore, if you take the time to do your own research, you’ll find that his statements about some black Americans actually hold weight. He posed a hypothetical question. He said, “I wonder IF” … Hell, I’m black and I often wonder about the same about the decline of the black family. Bottom line is that we are all slaves in this waning republic, no matter our skin color. Mr. Bundy could have used any racial demographic as an example: Native Americans on reservations, whites in trailer parks, etc. He noticed the crippling effects of receiving government “assistance” and the long term result of accepting handouts. It’s not progress at all. I challenge Sean Hannity, Rand Paul, and others to read my comment and reconsider their position in this matter. Individual liberties are at stake here, yours and mine. THAT is the issue. Don’t let the liberal media and ignoramuses like Glenn Beck and that weasel Harry Reid make you lose sight of the real issue here: The federal government is a burgeoning behemoth and a bully on a once constitutional playground.I sincerely hope you real patriots out there who can see through the smoke.

Nevada: Judge rules Hage doesn't need grazing permit December 18, 2002 Nevada Live Stock Association P.O. Box 639 Hawthorne, Nevada 89415 In a hearing before the United States Court of Federal Claims, Washington, D.C., on December 11, 2002, Senior Judge Loren Smith ruled that Tonopah, Nevada, rancher Wayne Hage, did not need a grazing permit to access his water rights and forage on his grazing allotments. "This is another landmark decision for us, long in coming," said Wayne Hage from Pine Creek Ranch. Judge Smith ruled on a Motion for Summary Judgment brought by the United States on behalf of the United States Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. The Motion placed the issue of a mandatory grazing permit squarely before the Court. The Court dismissed the motion, in Hage's favor, as a matter of law. "We now know, as I have said for years, that ranchers do not need a grazing permit to use our water and forage," said Hage. Other issues of the litigation discussed in the hearing were discovery, deposition lists for the 'taking' phase, and compensation. "Considerable discussion was given in the hearing to the question of how to place a value on the compensation owed by the United States for the taking of my property. Instead of denying we own anything, it's nice to hear them ask how much they owe us," said Hage. The litigation, Hage v. U.S. was originally filed in 1991 when the U.S. Forest Service attempted to take Hage's water rights and grazing allotments by canceling his grazing permit. Hage has argued that his property rights in water and forage are not dependent on a federal grazing permit. Judge Smith has now settled this matter. In January, the same court, in a Final Decision and Finding of Fact, found that Hage's water rights were vested and that the allotments themselves were "fee lands" to which Hage had title. The court found that, based on his vested water rights, Hage had an inheritable right to use the lands of the United States for livestock grazing. Fee is defined as an estate in inheritance without condition, belonging to the owner in perpetuity (See Black's Law Dictionary). The Decision said that Hage owned the "fee" while the underlying naked title to the land and minerals remained in the United States. TONOPAH, Nev.: A decades-long battle between an American ranching family and the United States government over water rights and cattle grazing on federal lands appears to have ended June 6, when a D.C.-based federal judge ruled in favor of the family and awarded more than $4.2 million in compensation – plus 17 years of interest and attorney’s fees and costs -- to the estates of the late Nevada rancher and property rights advocate Wayne Hage and his first wife, Jean Nichols Hage. The total is expected to be about $12.4 million. Describing the conflict as a “drama worthy of a tragic opera with heroic characters,” U.S. Court of Federal Claims Senior Judge Loren A. Smith, in an 18-page Opinion, ruled the Hages owned the water rights, ditch rights-of-way, and range improvements on the federal grazing allotments for Pine Creek Ranch in central Nevada, they purchased in 1978 – and that by its actions the U.S. Forest Service had indeed “taken” the couple’s constitutionally protected private property rights and they deserved compensation. Hage purchased his land and water rights in 1978

Where did the tard come up with this?

How about this one? My bad, you said dog not hog

If you prefer to read it: http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/unedited-tape-bundy-emerges-sheds-light-racist-remarks And the NY Times has been caught lying before: http://www.bing.com/search?q=ny+times+caught+lying&qs=n&form=QBLH&pq=ny+times+caught+lying&sc=0-11&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=f8b7f8eea2494d80a8b3f7a197b01239

Lets analyze a couple of paragraphs from the KLAS-TV article: Bundy repeated a similar claim Thursday when he told TheBlaze website: “My family has preemptive, adjudicated livestock water rights filed with the state of Nevada. They were established in 1877 when the first pioneers entered the valley. Among those first pioneers were my grandparents from my mother’s side. My father either bought or inherited his Nevada state livestock water rights and I, in turn, have done the same.” Separate records from the website FamilySearch, which is sponsored by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, indicate that Christena Jensen was born in Nevada in 1901 and that Bodel Jensen was born in Nevada in 1924. Christena Jensen’s parents originally were from Utah. This is the side of the family where Cliven Bundy claims long-standing livestock water rights. Bundy claims that his grandparents on his mother’s side owned the land which gives him the right that he now has. Looking at the second paragraph, his grandmother Christena was born in Nevada in 1901 and Christena parents were originally were from Utah. So her parents were probably born in Utah and moved to Nevada when? The article doesn’t state that. In all probability they could have owed the land in 1877 which is 24 years before Christena was born. But the article suggests the 1877 date is incorrect but has no proof it isn’t. Nevada’s first census was in 1875 according to Ancestry.com “In 1875, the state legislature of Nevada ordered a state census. During the first 15 years of statehood, Nevada had seen an enormous influx of people. The silver boom was at its height, and the population was higher than it would be at any time during the 19th century.” The person who done all the back ground checks for the news article work pretty hard digging through old documents trying to insinuate Bundy is lying. However, more of the opposite is proven. Why did they skip on providing the documents from the FamilySearch website? Also the 1875 Nevada census could possibly have shown Christena’s mother and father living someplace in Nevada. I’m sure the first state census is well preserved and archived for study. Why not provide that information too? But the real kicker in the whole story is that the article acts like the Bundy’s mothers side isn’t real family. Just because the rights were not pass down from the Bundy’s side of the family doesn’t make it fraudulent. This is for you LH http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Orfj-DdB1A8/TK3-nyPkhHI/AAAAAAAAANA/J67a7NLdVN0/s1600/Bill+Engvall+Here%27s+Your+Sign.jpg

Why is Harry Reid like a Hoover vacuum? When you get down to the nitty-gritty, they are both a couple of dirt bags. Harry is really attracting the attention, even the FBI. One little problem, the entire Obama administration is so corrupt the Justice Department will not allow any investigation. FBI agents working alongside Utah state prosecutors in a wide-ranging corruption investigation have uncovered accusations of wrongdoing by two of the U.S. Senate’s most prominent figures — Majority Leader Harry Reid and rising Republican Sen. Mike Lee — but the Justice Department has thwarted their bid to launch a full federal investigation. The probe, conducted by one Republican and one Democratic state prosecutor in Utah, has received accusations from an indicted businessman and political donor, interviewed other witnesses and gathered preliminary evidence such as financial records, Congressional Record statements and photographs that corroborate some aspects of the accusations, officials have told The Washington Times and ABC News. But the Justice Department’s public integrity section — which normally handles corruption cases involving elected figures — rejected FBI agents’ bid to use a federal grand jury and subpoenas to determine whether the accusations are true and whether any federal crimes were committed by state and federal officials. Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/mar/13/fbi-blocked-in-corruption-probe-involving-sens-rei/#ixzz2zHD2ciZg Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

The hood assembly has been made from aluminum for several years. Your answer is right in front of your nose.

Déjà vu The rabbit hole is getting deeper http://www.infowars.com/federal-judge-blm-engaged-in-a-criminal-conspiracy-against-ranchers/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/144609491/United-States-v-Estate-of-Hage-No-2-07-cv-01154-RCJ-VCF-Findings-of-Fact-Conclusions-of-Law-and-Injunction-D-Nev-May-24-2013

And I thought the Bush administration was bad. But Obama's administration makes the prior one look like a bunch of altar boys. Obama and every top official belong in jail. It's getting worse daily. A series of emails from ex-IRS official Lois Lerner, who twice refused to answer questions from Congress about her targeting of conservative groups, reveals she was in contact with Eric Holder’s Department of Justice about prosecuting those organizations, according to the Washington watchdog group Judicial Watch. “These new emails show that the day before she broke the news of the IRS scandal, Lois Lerner was talking to a top Obama Justice Department official about whether the DOJ could prosecute the very same organizations that the IRS had already improperly targeted,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton Wednesday. Fitton said the IRS emails show the Department of Justice is now implicated and conflicted in the IRS scandal. “No wonder we had to sue in federal court to get these documents,” he said. The IRS has admitted creating special hurdles for conservatives opposing President Obama’s policies as they tried to acquire tax-exempt status leading up to the 2012 election. Among the hurdles were a demand to know the content of a group’s prayers and a promise not to protest the abortion business Planned Parenthood. Now Judicial Watch has gone to court to get copies of the emails, which includes a May 9, 2013, message indicating the IRS planned to meet with the Department of Justice over whether to prosecute groups that “lied” about their political activity. Judicial Watch said a new batch of internal IRS documents show Lerner, who has been referred to the full House of Representatives for a vote on contempt of Congress charges, “communicated with the Department of Justice about whether it was possible to criminally prosecute certain tax-exempt entities.” Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/lerner-emails-plotted-prosecuting-conservatives/#zTcwUFb1us3ADojm.99

They forgot to mention they also euthanize (murder) turtles protected under the Endangered Species Act. One of those ‘special’ laws they wrote for only Federal/Public lands.

I just copied and pasted the link in. Seems to work like Facebook.