The only Caveat I can see is that the SHO is supposed to be a performance vehicle and thus doesn't need to play that game, but at the same time it shouldn't have those some what ugly looking SHO/Ecoboost badges on it.
like I said before, whats the point if it doesn't get the same MPG as a AWD Taurus to have Ecoboost badges on it? Does that extra 10HP affect MPG that much?
If its rated at 15/24, I'm gonna have to cross it off and I'll look at getting a Fusion Sport or an Ecoboost I4 SEL down the road when I'm in the market for a new car.
The whole point (to me) of the SHO was to have a fun car to drive that good MPG with a some what famous name to go along with it...I guess owning a car with a bit of snob appeal to it, without the BMW or Mercedes name attached to it.
Guess we'll have to wait for the offical numbers, which have been thankfully higher then Fords estimates the past couple launches
I did some searching, the MKS Ecoboost is estimated to be at 16/25 MPG...so I guess 15/25 is reasonable for a car tuned for performance like the SHO, still disappointing a point, but hpefully they are lowballing the estimates once again