Tornado

Double post

The console-mounted knob controls the terrain management system, offering four settings for various road conditions and hell descent control Wow, is that the new standard for Built Ford Tough?

Sweet ride, I have always wanted a '64-'65. By the way, add some new wheels to the list too.

Isn't the Mustang's crank forged? Maybe the F150's is cast.

That's awfluly close to the 6.2L, so what's the point?

So we have four possibilties? In order of the most logical solution: 1) Heavy Duty D3 (probably shared suspension with the new Explorer), 3.7L, optional AWD and different skin. 2) Revised Panther with 2011 Mustang powertrains 3) RWD D3 (would mean that the new Explorer would probably also be RWD) 4) Falcon :hyper:

If they do a north/south layout on the PI, would it not make since that the upcoming Explorer be the same way?

Driving mostly conservativly my '08 4.6L 2wd Sport Trac gets 17 mpg in my weekly drive 85% city. On a recent trip to hand over a bunch of money to Mickey Mouse, it got 22.8 mpg 90% highway.

I bet the Fusion sport gets that 3.7L next year! Let me get off track for a second. 2011 Fusion engine line up? NA 2.5 175hp hybrid 2.5 191hp EB 2.0 240hp+/- NA 3.7 305hp

When did they rerate the 3.0L to 19mpg city?

http://jalopnik.com/5450861/2011-ford-mustang-priced-higher-still-worth-it

It will be the next Ranger! :lol:

If the Falcon is to stay the same size and the Mustang is to share the architecture, does this mean the Mustang is going to get bigger and become Camaro/Challenger size :unsure:

That second picture is awsome!

2012 adds: EB 2.0L as the base Boss - with a small bump in horsepower over 5.0L GT engine, road racing IRS and big brakes - Think Cobra R I see Ford tempting alot of 4.6L GT drivers into the 3.7L to boost CAFE numbers and making V-8 lovers pay alittle more.