Jump to content

Chrysler vows to be a quality leader by 2012


mkaresh

Recommended Posts

According to today's Detroit News, Chrysler is claiming that they will be a (though not "the") quality leader by the end of 2012. They (and many other auto makers) have made similar claims before. Sometimes they achieve these goals. More often they don't. Chrysler's chances?

 

Chrysler is increasing its odds of success by making what appear to be substantial changes to its organization and culture. A new senior VP of quality has been hired away from Nissan (they're a quality leader?). The quality organizatioin has been enlarged from 200 to 1,700 people. These people have been organized into cross-functional teams focused on the quick execution of needed changes. Perhaps the biggest change of all: Chrysler now claims that they will tackle problems rather than pretending they don't exist or ignoring them and hoping they'll go away. (Which has been proven to result in customers going away.)

 

Unknown: whether these people really have the pull to get their requested changes executed. Large organizations are chock full of special teams charged with getting something done, but without the pull to actually get it done. Is this one of those?

 

Chryler claims that engineering changes have already had a substantial impact on existing products. Supposedly, while 75 percent of defects were design-related last year, with the remaining 25 percent occurring during assembly, the ratio is now 50-50. If we assume that the number of assembly defects has not changed, this implies that the total number of defects has already been cut in half.

 

Too good to be true? Are these just rough, shoot-from-the-hip numbers? Perhaps, but if the head of quality is dishing out such numbers...not the most promising sign.

 

Also, why haven't the assembly-related problems come down, if this is the case? These should be easier to quickly reduce than the design-related problems, since you don't have to design and validate new parts to fix them.

 

TrueDelta promptly updates its Car Reliability Survey results four times a year, not just once after a lengthy delay. So if Chrysler's quality does improve, it will show up here first:

 

Car Reliability Survey results

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:sigh:

 

Here's the formula:

 

Pick a worthy goal

 

Pick an unreasonable target

 

Pick a deadline far enough out to assure most people will forget about your prediction.

 

Bill Ford's 25% SUV fuel economy improvement was a classic example.

 

This is no different.

So true!

Chrysler has taken this procedure and applied the "rinse, lather, repeat" rule. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL just fell off my chair.

 

:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

 

With a little help & expetise from fix it again Tony no doubt.

 

Still at least their quality is a lot better than Toyota at the moment, you gotta give them credit where credit is due.

 

"Only way is Up". Go Chrysler go baby go don't let the bastards grind you down l like Jeep & Fiats 500.

LINK

Edited by Ford Jellymoulds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, Fiat............. a company that most do not equate to quality, is going to show Chrysler................ a company that most do not equate to quality................. how to fix their quality??

 

The expression "the blind leading the blind," comes to mind.

 

 

remids me of that joke about the glass bottomed boats in the Italian navy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:sigh:

 

Here's the formula:

 

Pick a worthy goal

 

Pick an unreasonable target

 

Pick a deadline far enough out to assure most people will forget about your prediction.

 

Bill Ford's 25% SUV fuel economy improvement was a classic example.

 

This is no different.

You're a "cruel man" Richard Jensen, :D

 

Guess that proves your point, eh?

Edited by jpd80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't count Chrysler out on this. They have had some remarkably reliable and trouble free products in the recent past.

 

For example, Consumer Reports found the PT Cruiser to be the single most trouble free vehicle they ever surveyed for a few model years.

 

It can be done. Volkswagon has certainly turned around the abysmal quality of at least the Rabbit/Golf in a remarkably short 3 years. Again, looking at CU, the Golf gets pretty much all red doughnuts in every catagory over the past 3 years.

 

Most of Chrysler's problems seem to be from crappy components, particularly the electrical components (window regulators, control modules, etc.). Now that the Germans are out of the picture and no longer leaning on suppliers for a quality-killing 20% across the board cost reduction, quality can only improve.

 

Here's hoping FIAT can get all of the crap quality German components out of the Chrysler cars ASAP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't count Chrysler out on this. They have had some remarkably reliable and trouble free products in the recent past.

 

For example, Consumer Reports found the PT Cruiser to be the single most trouble free vehicle they ever surveyed for a few model years.

 

It can be done. Volkswagon has certainly turned around the abysmal quality of at least the Rabbit/Golf in a remarkably short 3 years. Again, looking at CU, the Golf gets pretty much all red doughnuts in every catagory over the past 3 years.

 

Most of Chrysler's problems seem to be from crappy components, particularly the electrical components (window regulators, control modules, etc.). Now that the Germans are out of the picture and no longer leaning on suppliers for a quality-killing 20% across the board cost reduction, quality can only improve.

 

Here's hoping FIAT can get all of the crap quality German components out of the Chrysler cars ASAP.

 

The same can be said of the Panther... leave it on the market unchanged for a decade and you'd better have worked out all the kinks! The evidence isn't just anecdotal, either. As a whole, ChryCo just hasn't performed very well in any of the major studies, and I don't recall seeing any remarkable improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...