Edstock Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 Tim Egan writes for the New York Times. Worthy of consideration. http://egan.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/11/the-betrayal/?hp November 11, 2009, 9:30 pm The Betrayal ST. LOUIS – So long as Budweiser, the King of Beers, was enthroned in this pleasant and nobly resilient middle American city, the blows of corporate condescension from the other giants who abandoned the Gateway Arch could be endured. But then, last year, came a kidney punch that still hurts: Anheuser-Busch, which had survived Prohibition and the micro-brew craze, was sold to a Belgian brewer. Bud was now Euro-beer. Next they’ll tell us Huck Finn had a taste for éclairs as he floated down the Mississippi. Board members, those solid citizens of St. Louis, made a pile in the merger that created the world’s largest brewer. But everyone else lost, including more than a 1,000 longtime employees given pink slips. I heard the Bud buyout mentioned in the same soured breaths that exhaled expletives regarding the upcoming bonuses that will be passed around this holiday season by Wall Street firms saved by taxpayers — $30 billion in bonuses to the top three investment banks. It takes quite a bit for Americans to say that the social contract is broken, or look upon concentrated wealth as anything except a virtue. But we may have reached that breach. Our politics are not simply left and right, conservative and liberal. Never have been. Every once in a while, the great middle of independents are stirred to one side. My guess is, if the drift caused by recent actions continues, the United States will be consumed in the coming year by the politics of betrayal, and the winner will be ahead of the rage. Right now, a time when only 20 percent of Americans call themselves Republicans and Democrats are shrinking as well, the independents are disgusted with both parties. In large part, it’s because neither one seems to be on their side. The early warning shots came on Nov. 3, against an ineffective former Wall Street executive, ousted New Jersey governor Jon Corzine, and the billionaire mayor who barely bought himself a third term, Michael Bloomberg of New York. Both felt the back hand of an electorate that feels as if the system is rigged against them. A year ago, most people were open-minded about the ground-shaking changes that came with the economic collapse. Polls found a slim majority in favor of Wall street bailouts to save the economy. They would listen, watch, wait. By this fall, the majority were not only against the bailouts, but in favor of curbing pay on Wall Street, and tightening government regulation of same. The continuous drip of perceived unfairness continues. One day it’s news that Goldman Sachs seems to have stepped ahead of the line of those waiting to receive H1N1 vaccines, prompting questions about why investment bankers were getting doses rather than children or pregnant women. This week, Gallup found one in five parents saying they were unable to get swine flu vaccine for their children. Another day brings a report that the top banks are raising credit card interest rates – some as high as 29 percent, which would shame a Mob extortionist — even against people who have always paid on time. This is the thanks we get? If Congress steers through the Great Recession without responding to the thousand points of pain among average Americans, people will see them for what they are in bottom-line terms: an insulated club. Proof, just recently, came from a Center for Responsive Politics report that 237 members of Congress — 44 percent — are millionaires, compared to just 1 percent for the country as whole. In theory, there’s nothing wrong with a Congress stuffed with people who don’t have to buy health care on the open market, or worry about meeting a mortgage payment. But in practice, it’s a prescription for misrepresentation. And though Congress is now trying to curb Wall Street excess, the reform effort seems headed for K Street strangulation. Two things will define which way the rage goes next year: health care, and the fate of the feeble economic recovery. Again, forget liberal and conservative labels. In recent Gallup polls, 54 percent of Americans perceived Barack Obama’s policies to be “mostly liberal” and an identical margin approved of his presidency. This in a country where only 20 percent are self-described liberals. If health care reform gives people a choice, and doesn’t just fatten the rolls of insurance companies, it will be something to run on. If the recovery helps millions of people who don’t have a well-staffed lobby in Washington, it too will be a plus. History, as always, is a guide for these American moments. There was once a political party that came out against concentration of wealth. They called for regulation of food, drugs, and big corporations. Called for “square deal” for the average American. And their robust spokesman, the leader of their party, said this of his countrymen: “There is not in the world a more ignoble character than the mere money-getting American, insensitive to every duty, regardless of principle, bent only on amassing a fortune.” That party was the Republicans, a bit more than century ago, led by Teddy Roosevelt. The next governing majority will be guided by independents, and include liberals, conservatives and people whose great-grandparents left the Republican Party a century ago. It will also include a whole lot of Budweiser drinkers, wondering how the world changed so quickly, without them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 Budweiser wouldn't have had to sell out if they didn't sell such shitty product. :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron W. Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 Budweiser wouldn't have had to sell out if they didn't sell such shitty product. :D I like Budweiser and they sold(out) so that SOME people could get rich. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 I like Budweiser and they sold(out) so that SOME people could get rich. Some...as in any shareholder? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron W. Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 Perhaps I was to aggressive and or judgmental with my response, but you can bet your butt that people like Warren Buffet, Cindy McCain and the members of the Busch family made out very well. Now quit bothering me, I'm supposed to be looking for a job :shades: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xr7g428 Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 The betrayal is the abandonment of conservatives by the Republican party. Conservatives have no place to go. The Ron Paul libertarians that believe that 9/11 was an inside job are equally as scary as Pelosi and Reid. There is a teaching moment that the Democrats should be getting: the far left is as dangerous to the Democrat party as the Religious right was to the Republicans. In far better times, Carville got it right: it's the economy, stupid. Most Democrats are far more concerned about jobs and the economy than health-care and global warming. It is becoming increasingly obvious that the Stimulus money really went to fund a bunch of liberal pork barrel projects that would have never been funded under any other circumstance, and more over, has done nothing tangible to stimulate the economy. There is no discussion about the only thing that might actually make a difference: creating incentives for businesses to hire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikem12 Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 Budweiser wouldn't have had to sell out if they didn't sell such shitty product. :D I've been drinking Bud sice 1969 until ther sell out. I have since gone to one of the few American beers left. PBR Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rn4 Posted November 13, 2009 Share Posted November 13, 2009 I've been drinking Bud sice 1969 until ther sell out. I have since gone to one of the few American beers left. PBR Mike Actually PBR is an American owned co. but it outsources it's brewing to miller which is foreign owned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ford Jellymoulds Posted November 13, 2009 Share Posted November 13, 2009 (edited) Used to drink Buds sometimes, but not had one since the Belgium brussel sprouts brought them out, its Guinness only now. US are selling a off a lot of its European based companies to make the profits look good back home in the US. Walmart just sold off Asda supermarket chain last week in the UK, they are No2 in the UK just behind Tesco. Edited November 13, 2009 by Ford Jellymoulds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted November 13, 2009 Share Posted November 13, 2009 I've been drinking Bud sice 1969 until ther sell out. I have since gone to one of the few American beers left. PBR Mike Mostly Sam Adams for me. :beerchug: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.