Jump to content

Custom Search





2019 Lincoln Aviator Introduced Here !


Welcome to Blue Oval Forums


Sign In  Log in with Facebook

Create Account
Welcome to Blue Oval Forums.  You must first register to create topics and post replies. Registration is a quick and easy process and only takes a minute.  Be apart of Blue Oval Forums by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members
  • Create a photo album and post images
  • Use the Shout feature and more. . .
Click here to create an account now.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

Self-driving cars hitting red lights


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#41 OFFLINE   jpd80

jpd80

    Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,114 posts
  • Joined 02-June 04
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:My Happy Place
  • Current Vehicle:Falcon 302 V8

Posted 12 May 2018 - 04:01 PM

 

"Starting small" with autonomous vehicle testing but doing it as soon as possible could be the way to go. Drive.ai CEO S. Tandon said "We know there are hard problems. We know we will solve them over time. We know we want to do something today.”

 

Excellent Car and Driver article about Drive.ai's Autonomous Shuttle service that will kick off this July in Frisco, Texas in the DFW Metroplex. https://www.caranddr...orkers-to-lunch

 

 

The problem is that regulators have agreed to beta testing on public roads without

fully understanding the tech and its limitations. 

 

Any other vehicle type with such a glaring lack of inherent  safety to the public (competent operator)

wold be immediately removed from public use but somehow, there is a huge perception gap with AVs.

We want them so badly that we're prepared to give away all the necessary checks and validation tests....

 

All the talk in the world about triple redundancy is useless if the basic system can't detect obstacles and

pedestrians it's supposed to avoid. Even some simple tests to prove that the system responds adequately

to avoidable objects that move into the vehicle's path.

 

And the reason Google and Uber want to field test without tests in place is because they know that

their systems are not perfect and most likely fail the expectations of a most basic test, avoiding pedestrians.


Edited by jpd80, 12 May 2018 - 04:04 PM.

  • 2b2 likes this







Lose this advertisement by becoming a member. Click here to create a free account.


#42 OFFLINE   OX1

OX1

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 91 posts
  • Joined 15-January 08

Posted 12 May 2018 - 08:57 PM

I consider some things to be inevitable ... like:

- lawmakers sticking completely ignorant noses where they doN'T belong

- tech-types [fore-]seeing only what they want/like

- the rich not giving a sheise about the needs of the non-rich

&

310px-Hindenburg_disaster.jpg

- how many have to die to give up on it?

 

It's sad the crappy memorial they have at that site. 

Just a tiny pole with a little blimp on it. Can barely see it. 


59 Bird-430

70, 74, 78, 79 Broncos

86 Capri, 5.0 Turbo

14 Stang GT

17 Fusion Sport









Custom Search


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Privacy Policy Terms of Service | DMCA ·