silvrsvt Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 http://autoweek.com/article/rumormill/full-size-sedans-die-impala-could-be-next?utm_source=DailyDrive20170725&utm_medium=enewsletter&utm_term=headline-center&utm_content=body&utm_campaign=awdailydrive Few cars have enjoyed as much success as the Impala. Its collapse since the recession has been equally stunning, with 2017 marking the car's seventh consecutive year of declining sales. Even in 2014, after it was last redesigned, the Impala dominated the large-car segment. But after its sales plummeted 45 percent in the first half of 2017, the Impala now trails the Dodge Charger and the Maxima. t gets worse. Retail sales of the Impala have fallen 57 percent this year, to just 10,707 units in six months. Two-thirds of the Impalas sold in 2017 went to airport car-rental lots and other fleet operators. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthony Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 Ouch. It is a nice car too. But as car sales dwindle, the biggest and smallest seem to be the first to die off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzcat Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 (edited) It's a demographics game... the people who may buy a fullsize sedan are probably older baby boomers like my parents... and they have probably already bought the last new one they will ever buy. Younger baby boomer just entering retirement and Gen Xers in their peak earning years are buying CUVs and luxury cars, not fullsize sedans. And Gen Y are probably never going to even buy a midsize sedan. Edited July 25, 2017 by bzcat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice-capades Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Yeah, I know... cheap gas, etc. but I'm constantly amazed at the overwhelming obsession that the market has towards trucks and SUV's. While I'm obviously a big fan of Ford products, I've been impressed with how far Chevrolet has come with their vehicle designs being the best ever for the Bow Tie division. Today's automotive car market reminds me of what happened with cell phones after Apple introduced the iPhone. Apple as a consumer electronics firm is brilliant at packaging design and creating a "cool" factor that alone drives market demand. It might not be the best product in the market but if people perceive it to be the "cool" product they'll buy it. Customers today are buying trucks, CUV's and SUV's not necessarily because they have a need for those vehicles' particular attributes but because they want them, need or not. And the truck and SUV sales continue to grow as the market perceptions, popularity, etc. feed on themselves and drive their sales even higher. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvrsvt Posted July 26, 2017 Author Share Posted July 26, 2017 Yeah, I know... cheap gas, etc. but I'm constantly amazed at the overwhelming obsession that the market has towards trucks and SUV's. While I'm obviously a big fan of Ford products, I've been impressed with how far Chevrolet has come with their vehicle designs being the best ever for the Bow Tie division. Today's automotive car market reminds me of what happened with cell phones after Apple introduced the iPhone. Apple as a consumer electronics firm is brilliant at packaging design and creating a "cool" factor that alone drives market demand. It might not be the best product in the market but if people perceive it to be the "cool" product they'll buy it. Customers today are buying trucks, CUV's and SUV's not necessarily because they have a need for those vehicles' particular attributes but because they want them, need or not. And the truck and SUV sales continue to grow as the market perceptions, popularity, etc. feed on themselves and drive their sales even higher. Another way of looking at this is that vehicle costs have risen and people think trucks and SUV's are "worth" the money you pay for them vs say 40K on a nicely loaded Fusion sedan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 I think it's a byproduct of the SUV boom in the 90s. A lot of today's buyers grew up with utilities rather than cars. They like the extra cargo capacity and higher seating position. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chefduane Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 ^ That's exactly my position. I had 2 really nice Honda Accord sedans right in a row after college. Then I went to a '92 Explorer. Then a '98 Explorer, now an '11 Edge. I'll never drive another sedan unless it's my wife's LS430. (MUCH nicer than an Accord BTW.) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 ^ That's exactly my position. I had 2 really nice Honda Accord sedans right in a row after college. Then I went to a '92 Explorer. Then a '98 Explorer, now an '11 Edge. I'll never drive another sedan unless it's my wife's LS430. (MUCH nicer than an Accord BTW.) We went from a Honda Accord to a 93 explorer than another explorer, expedition and Aviator before the 2008 edge. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Agree with generational change suggested above, we're now seeing the second generation of utility buyers in the market displacing more and more car purchaeses, even to the point that daly rentals are moving away from them too... The important thing now is to reinvent the car as a sportier version of those popular Utilities, 5-door hatchbacks and higher ground clearance may be in vogue in years to come.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sullynd Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 JPD, you've suggested it before. Not sure about in Australia, but in the US the reinvention of the AMC Eagle has not been popular. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvrsvt Posted July 26, 2017 Author Share Posted July 26, 2017 It's a demographics game... the people who may buy a fullsize sedan are probably older baby boomers like my parents... and they have probably already bought the last new one they will ever buy. That is the truth...I know when I go through my parents retirement development, most vehicles are small SUV's with a couple mid-sized sedans in the drive ways. The Crown Vic more or less died around the same time its target demographic passed away or quit driving (Silent/Greatest Generation) Small SUVs are the most sold vehicle to people 55+ Only reason I got a full sized sedan was it was the only performance car that Ford was offering that wasn't a Mustang or geared to younger generation in the form of the Focus/Fiesta ST. Not a huge fan of Trucks or CUVs, but I do have to say the Bronco does have my full attention as my next car. But then again I do want to add another Mustang to mix before I hit 50 too :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fgts Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 I'm pretty sure the Taurus is in trouble too in its current form. As I mentioned before the Impala in it's current form is not long for this world and we'll see a an Alpha or Omega replacement, FCA looks like they have the formula for full-size cars in this type of market. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fgts Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 (edited) DP Edited July 26, 2017 by Fgts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdegrand Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 ^ That's exactly my position. I had 2 really nice Honda Accord sedans right in a row after college. Then I went to a '92 Explorer. Then a '98 Explorer, now an '11 Edge. I'll never drive another sedan unless it's my wife's LS430. (MUCH nicer than an Accord BTW.) Lexus is really struggling with the LS model...sales down almost 50%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzymoomoo Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 I'm pretty sure the Taurus is in trouble too in its current form. As I mentioned before the Impala in it's current form is not long for this world and we'll see a an Alpha or Omega replacement, FCA looks like they have the formula for full-size cars in this type of market. And even their sales are starting to slip a little bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-150 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Ever seen a retiree struggle to get out of a sedan? The higher seating position of a CUV makes 100% sense for access/egress. When I was a teen I had a 2wd Ranger. My Grandfather loved getting in and out of that. No reaching up into a full size truck and no sinking down into a sedan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdegrand Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 And even their sales are starting to slip a little bit. Since 2010 introduction, the Taurus has been basically unchanged and has been challenged by its competitors....however, the initial design still attracts a market of buyers. YTD Impala sales down 45%, Azera down 44%, Avalon down 28%, Lacrosse down 12%, Charger down 11%, 300 down 9% and Taurus down 9%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzymoomoo Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Charger down 11%, 300 down 9% and Taurus down 9%. Exactly my point. It's one of the few things FCA does well and even they can't escape from carpocalypse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 I'm pretty sure the Taurus is in trouble too in its current form. As I mentioned before the Impala in it's current form is not long for this world and we'll see a an Alpha or Omega replacement, FCA looks like they have the formula for full-size cars in this type of market. Taurus has been a dead man walking since they killed the CD4 version. The only question is whether we'll see a lower volume but higher performance/higher ATP CD6 based replacement. It doesn't have to be high volume since it would be sharing a platform with (presumably) Continental and MkZ replacement). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Lexus is really struggling with the LS model...sales down almost 50%. Well, to be fair 1) it doesn't help that they've barely changed it since 2007, giving it a new grille and not much else, and 2) the new model was just shown and will be out soon. Since 2010 introduction, the Taurus has been basically unchanged and has been challenged by its competitors....however, the initial design still attracts a market of buyers. YTD Impala sales down 45%, Azera down 44%, Avalon down 28%, Lacrosse down 12%, Charger down 11%, 300 down 9% and Taurus down 9%. It did get a refresh in 2013. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 It did get a refresh in 2013. Which was barely noticeable just like most other refreshes the last few years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdegrand Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Well, to be fair 1) it doesn't help that they've barely changed it since 2007, giving it a new grille and not much else, and 2) the new model was just shown and will be out soon. It did get a refresh in 2013. Well, to also be fair, the LS had a major change in 2013 exterior and interior. The Taurus so called "refresh" was slight grill and new taillights....compared to total redesigned Impala and Avalon. In other words, the almost 9 year old "barely changed" Taurus is hanging in there for an old girl! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fgts Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Exactly my point. It's one of the few things FCA does well and even they can't escape from carpocalypse. However interesting note; Charger 2016 97.110 2015 94.725 2014 94.099 2013 98.336 2012 82.592 300 2016 53.058 2015 53.109 2014 53.382 2013 57.724 2012 70.747 Hopeful the new models for '20 will sustain or improve on these figures with available smaller engines and lighter curb weight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvrsvt Posted July 26, 2017 Author Share Posted July 26, 2017 However interesting note; Charger 2016 97.110 2015 94.725 2014 94.099 2013 98.336 2012 82.592 300 2016 53.058 2015 53.109 2014 53.382 2013 57.724 2012 70.747 Hopeful the new models for '20 will sustain or improve on these figures with available smaller engines and lighter curb weight. So how many of those charger sales are to fleets? the 300 sales are just flat for the past 4 years. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Which was barely noticeable just like most other refreshes the last few years. Eh, I'd argue it was more extensive than Fusion's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.