Jump to content

JDPower Dependability Study


Recommended Posts

Ford's rating improved from 205 last year to 183 this year, increasing 5 spots, while Lincoln dropped from 132 to 150, dropping 2 spots.

 

 

I've thought for a while now that they should have two separate categories of issues....and if they want to combine them into a single overall rating that's fine, but break the problems down into two categories - something like "catastrophic problems" and "minor issues"......or "powertrain issues" and "electronic issues." The point being to differentiate between issues that render the vehicle unusable or some part snaps off or whatnot vs. issues that are more of an inconvenience (i.e. "my phone connects slowly").

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone please help me understand the statistical relevance of Honda's 1.43 problems per vehicle vs Ford's 1.83 problems per vehicle. Since it it impossible to have actually 4 tenths of a problem with your vehicle, would this not be a statistical tie? Since the rankings have to be so granular to include a problem you actually cannot have, would it not be statistically correct to say everyone under 2 problems per vehicle is essentially tied for first place?

 

Interesting though that when you look at the green dots, Ford's weakness is powertrain, not the sync stuff. So it has to be the Focus/Fiesta dual clutch that continues to haunt.

Edited by Kev-Mo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look at it this way - on average you're going to have 1 or 2 problems in the first 3 years which would translate to 1 or 2 dealer visits. Nobody averages less than 1 and even if you have 2 problems you might only need one dealer visit for both.

 

Fiat is the only outlier.

 

The statistical conclusion is there is very little difference in dependability within the first 3 years of ownership.

 

Compare that with 2002 where the average was 3.5 and all but two brands was over 2. Huge difference.

 

4689d1039810972-honda-1-initial-quality-

Edited by akirby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a few people who did, the keyboard warriors went on in a hunting mission. I have heard Edmunds.com has become very tedious to look things up. Some said JDPower was a bit easier. Only 2 looked at Consumer Reports only because they were already a member. But they didn't go with the top ranking vehicle (which was a Toyota), they went with something near the top. One said that the 2 Toyota dealerships they went to had obnoxious sales people who right off the bat weren't wanting to negotiate so they left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should be much more concerned with 4-8 year dependability which I suppose is what CR tries to measure. First 3 years are under warranty with almost every vehicle. Even the worst cars today don't fall apart after 100K miles and most can easily go 150K with no major problems and only minor maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, like a typical Buick driver that might not realize there's a noise in the vehicle, because they can't hear it? Or a radio knob that's broken but it's on something they never touch ? Or like a friend of mine that would climb sidewalks with her Taurus, then had the audacity to say she had car problems because she had to replace some suspension parts. LOL Sometimes I say its about what you attract and how it's reported.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...