Jump to content

Surprise, '18 Equinox revealed


Fgts

Recommended Posts

Is there something wrong with the pictures, or does it really look that squished on the outside? The back looks like it's falling off to me....the rear quarters/3rd window of it just look strange.

 

I looked on Autoblog, but then it looks just as bad on GM's website:

 

2018-chevrolet-equinox-suv-reveal-design

2018-chevrolet-equinox-suv-reveal-design

2018-chevrolet-equinox-suv-reveal-design

Edited by rmc523
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking that it doesn't look too bad, but then I saw the last picture and the overstyled rear quarter panel and the bulge under the tail light. WTH Chevy!? It's like they always get so much right, but miss a little piece that blows the whole thing out of the water. Hey, at least it has round wheel wells!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that was surprising. Wonder why now?

 

It does carry over some of that new age non-linear sculpting that Chevy and Buick particularly like right now. Tends to look better in person.

 

It has some skewed proportions and the rear is struggling to reconcile its squared haunches with the design. Otherwise just bored but it's certainly better than Escape.

 

GM is very good st creating upscale designs for their cheaper cars, the details and finishes are crisp and clean.

 

Nice to see the 9-Spd showing up on all the major Chevys in 2017.

Edited by BORG
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The diesel option is a surprising move by GM but a very good one,

heavier vehicles like Utilities are where small diesel excel,

a much better idea than limiting it to a compact sedan.

 

 

Link

The Equinox sits on a new architecture that lets the crossover’s instrument panel be positioned down and away. A low windshield panel allows a good view. It also has a rear “kneeling” seat: The bottom cushions tilt forward when seatbacks are lowered, to allow for a flat floor for loading.

 

The 2018 model will offer the choice of three turbocharged engines, including a 1.6-liter turbo diesel that Chevy says will be the first turbo-diesel in North America in the compact SUV segment.

So the Equinox is now a Compact Utility - that makes this more of a Captiva replacement...

 

The 1.6 Turbo Diesel works in this sized vehicle but I wonder if GM is open

to a larger 2.0 Turbo Diesel in a larger Utility, one where gerater economy

would be even more noticeable.

Edited by jpd80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was this an intentional release? Seems like an important vehicle to just let slip out like that.

 

I think it looks pretty good.

 

Will Chevy get an Acadia sized vehicle? My sister has one of the first of this model Nox (09?) and loves it. It replaced her Escape. I got her to look at the 17 Escape but she does not like it. Part of the appeal of the current Nox is its "tweener" size. I think shrinking it makes sense in the broader market, but for those who like the current size what are they to grow into? Certainly the Traverse will be too big.

Edited by sullynd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The side character line that flows down to rear wheel opening makes the car look flabby and fat by the rear wheel. If the vehicle isn't equipped with the largest tire/wheel option, the character line emphasizes how small the wheel/tire really is. The new Malibu shares this problem.

 

I'm not seeing how this is better than the Escape. It does look larger than the Escape, but I would not say that it is better-looking.

Edited by grbeck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there something wrong with the pictures, or does it really look that squished on the outside? The back looks like it's falling off to me....the rear quarters/3rd window of it just look strange.

 

I looked on Autoblog, but then it looks just as bad on GM's website:

 

2018-chevrolet-equinox-suv-reveal-design

2018-chevrolet-equinox-suv-reveal-design

2018-chevrolet-equinox-suv-reveal-design

If you can't beat the Honda CRV -then join the Honda CRV! Asian car design - see how big of a smiley face grill you can get away with and keep pulling the headlamps back into the fenders as far as possible. Yawn....

 

I think they all look alike and boring - but the buying public loves it!!

Edited by Kev-Mo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the diesel the same one they used in the Cruze? Has the diesel Cruze been a sales success? It does make sense to use it in this application if it was already federalized and is on the same platform as the Cruze.

 

I'm not a big fan of the curved body styling lines but they seem to be popular now. They look kind of random to me with no integrated styling purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the diesel the same one they used in the Cruze? Has the diesel Cruze been a sales success? It does make sense to use it in this application if it was already federalized and is on the same platform as the Cruze.

 

I'm not a big fan of the curved body styling lines but they seem to be popular now. They look kind of random to me with no integrated styling purpose.

The diesel makes more sense in a heavier Utility where the difference in fuel economy is more noticeable

and arguably greater benefit for meeting tighter CAFE limits.,

 

So using a 1.6 Turbo diesel in a compact Utility makes more sense than say an already fuel efficient compact car.

Take that a step further, small efficient diesel options in Mid sized and large Utilities would make even more sense.

 

Could you imagine a 36 mpg next gen Arcadia or Edge or maybe a 34 mpg Explorer/Traverse?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What one does not consider is the resale value. If it was a $3k premium, you will recover at least half that when you go to sell.

 

Even though gas motors are lasting longer and longer, the whole "diesel" mindset is that they are indestructable, last forever and get fantastic mpgs.

 

I loved my 6.0, I love my 6.7 and would love a small Diesel in a new Edge. A 40mpg edge with 9 speed tranny and diesel motor would blow everything else away.

Edited by blwnsmoke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are buying it purely to save money, a diesel won't get you there. Not today. Before all the new emissions equipment, sure. But the DPF and other related equipment bits require you to burn more fuel.

 

Don't forget, diesel is still roughly 10-20% higher than gasoline.

 

Diesels cost more to maintain, and longevity is a concern with today's cleaner diesels.

 

I'm just not sold on diesels to save money anymore.

 

Now, if you are buying your vehicle to tow 12, 15, 20k+ pounds? There's no question, diesel is the way to go. Less than that, I think you can get similar costs/mile out of a GTDI engine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...