Jump to content

Custom Search





Coming Up Next:
Lincoln Aviator


Welcome to Blue Oval Forums


Sign In  Log in with Facebook

Create Account
Welcome to Blue Oval Forums.  You must first register to create topics and post replies. Registration is a quick and easy process and only takes a minute.  Be apart of Blue Oval Forums by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members
  • Create a photo album and post images
  • Use the Shout feature and more. . .
Click here to create an account now.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

Mustang SUV


  • Please log in to reply
49 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   meyeste

meyeste

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 159 posts
  • Joined 13-August 05
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 13 June 2016 - 09:23 AM

As a father of two, that is also a soccer coach, baseball coach, avid skier,  snow shoe-er, hiker and mountain biker, dog owner,  I find that while I really want a Mustang GT, it's just not practical. On the other hand, I like the look of the Mustang, it's bold, beautiful and it puts a smile on your face when you start it, puts a smile on your face when you walk to it in a parking lot, puts a smile on your face when you open it up running down the freeway. (I do have access to a Mustang GT from a gracious friend). On the other hand another bigger vehicle with 4x4 is needed for all the things i do above, and I love the Expedition's capability, however the Mustang is in a different realm altogether when it comes to owner satisfaction. So while we have our people mover SUV's, I'd like to see Ford get in on the performance SUV market, and why bother being creative with the name just call it "Mustang SUV", use the same dog house, about the size of a X5, with a 5.0L and in it, the 2.7L turbo in it, you couldn't keep them on the lots. There'd be a high profit platform to share high performance engine development costs, honestly this is probably worth more than saving Lincoln, and I'd bet someone at Ford is already proposing it, - they have my support. Mustang SUV!!! And BTW I really do like the new Lincoln Navigator - that thing is killer, it's sorta what I am asking for here, but honestly I don't know that I could bring myself to buy a Lincoln. 


Edited by meyeste, 13 June 2016 - 09:57 AM.








Lose this advertisement by becoming a member. Click here to create a free account.


#2 OFFLINE   BORG

BORG

    Blue Oval Enthusiast

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 8,149 posts
  • Joined 19-September 99
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:None
  • Current Vehicle:None

Posted 13 June 2016 - 10:45 AM

This sounds like a job for Lincoln.  But Ford is already making really powerful and fast AWD cars and SUVs, I drive one of them.  


  • 2b2 likes this

#3 OFFLINE   silvrsvt

silvrsvt

    Bite my Shiny metal ass!

  • Moderator
  • 17,922 posts
  • Joined 03-October 02
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • Location:New Jersey
  • Current Vehicle:2017 Escape SE AWD/2013 Taurus SHO

Posted 14 June 2016 - 12:22 PM

Take a look at the Explorer Sport or Edge Sport...


"Hell, there are no rules here-- we're trying to accomplish something."
Thomas A. Edison


Ford Products owned though the years:
1986 Escort GT Race Red
1998 Mustang GT Dark Green Satin
2002 SVT Focus Satin Silver
2006 Mustang GT Tungsten Grey

2010 Escape XLT AWD Sport Blue
2013 Taurus SHO Ruby Red

2017 Escape SE AWD Platinum White

Future Fords:
2021 Bronco

20xx Mustang GT350 or the like

 

199923.png
 
photo-thumb-15254.jpg


#4 OFFLINE   fuzzymoomoo

fuzzymoomoo

    Blue Oval Enthusiast

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,981 posts
  • Joined 18-February 14
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:Southeast Michigan
  • Current Vehicle:2008 Focus, 2015 Focus

Posted 14 June 2016 - 12:31 PM

1 word

NO™

What? What happened?


#5 OFFLINE   2b2

2b2

    Mercury C557 wannabee

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,867 posts
  • Joined 21-August 04
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:NNW of Atlantis (Reno)
  • Current Vehicle:econobox

Posted 14 June 2016 - 05:35 PM

another word

Bronco


  • LSchicago, probowler and fuzzymoomoo like this

It’s not a journey. Every journey ends, but we go on. The world turns and we turn with it. Plans disappear. Dreams take over. Yet wherever I go, there you are. My luck, my fate, my fortune. MERCURY. It's inevitable.
Posted Image

MMXX


#6 OFFLINE   meyeste

meyeste

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 159 posts
  • Joined 13-August 05
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 22 June 2016 - 08:28 AM

another word
 

Bronco

 

A Bronco is different in concept it's an off-roader, look at the ultra success of vehicles like the Porsche SUV's, Audi SUV's, BMW SUV's these owners have little or no intention of ever taking them off-road, if they go off-road it's at the parking grounds of the polo club or some type of athletic game. I like Ford's SUV's (except the Explorer, don't get me started) and they may be sporty however they don't look sporty, not dedicated sporty, not like a Mustang or a Cayenne looks sporty. I don't believe there is a market for a return of the Bronco, however there clearly is a market for performance dedicated SUV's, the Mustang 5.0 Coyote is just too good of an engine, an SUV that compares to the Edge as the Mustang compares to a Focus would be a run-away success. 


  • 2b2 likes this

#7 OFFLINE   2b2

2b2

    Mercury C557 wannabee

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,867 posts
  • Joined 21-August 04
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:NNW of Atlantis (Reno)
  • Current Vehicle:econobox

Posted 22 June 2016 - 07:25 PM

^ thumb.gif
I'm very much in favor of exploring whitespaces on the Coupe-Sedan-Cuv-Suv spectrum
&
have been gently ranting for a sportbrake for the Lincoln STARstang family
:D
and more vigorously ranting for a sportier short-wlb MKX
which imho
would come out directly targeting the Macan

It’s not a journey. Every journey ends, but we go on. The world turns and we turn with it. Plans disappear. Dreams take over. Yet wherever I go, there you are. My luck, my fate, my fortune. MERCURY. It's inevitable.
Posted Image

MMXX


#8 OFFLINE   MACUSgo

MACUSgo

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 20 posts
  • Joined 19-July 16
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:nj
  • Current Vehicle:mustang gt premium

Posted 20 July 2016 - 09:34 AM

:thumbsup: Mustang SUV? looool....Very innovative.. But do u really think this is a good idea?  After all, u see, mustang is a sports car... :doh:



#9 OFFLINE   meyeste

meyeste

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 159 posts
  • Joined 13-August 05
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 06 August 2016 - 07:35 AM

Take a look at the Explorer Sport or Edge Sport...

I have been looking at Expeditions and Explorers, I love the outside of Explorers, the interior just doesn't feel right to me, I really wish it did, it just doesn't. The Expedition on the other hand is nice, my kids love them, and I love they way it drives, I like the interior as well, I'm not hurting to get a SUV and may just bite the bullet and get the Mustang GT anyway - put snow tires on the van....



#10 OFFLINE   meyeste

meyeste

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 159 posts
  • Joined 13-August 05
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 06 August 2016 - 07:46 AM

:thumbsup: Mustang SUV? looool....Very innovative.. But do u really think this is a good idea?  After all, u see, mustang is a sports car... :doh:

 

I really do, sure Ford has the Escape, Edge, Explorer and Expedition. Other than the Expedition they are all very good in their respective classes. With the 3.5 EB Expedition is now doing quite well vs. the GM large UTEs and honestly I believe in that class the #1 sales maker is the mpg number, if Ford beats the GM utes with those numbers with the next generation the sales picture will turn on it's ear immediately. 

However look at Porsche - the Cayenne changed that company significantly basically for the reason I have stated above, people wanted a Porsche but it didn't fit into their lives. Slap a 5.0L and a Mustang-esc dog house on an Edge and they'd have one, kinda like what they have now but with daring, provocative style not "stylistic safety". 


Edited by meyeste, 06 August 2016 - 07:47 AM.


#11 OFFLINE   meyeste

meyeste

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 159 posts
  • Joined 13-August 05
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 02 September 2016 - 09:40 AM

Three months later and I still think this is an awesome idea - a SUV build for superior on-road performance from the onset. Sure some off-road capability - though nothing beyond handling sand, snow or a moderately muddy gravel road. Requisites 5.0L, 6 speed manual as an option, looks the part - as a Mustang looks the part and an interior you love - also like the Mustang.  



#12 OFFLINE   NLPRacing

NLPRacing

    Blue Oval Enthusiast

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,998 posts
  • Joined 24-October 00
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:Arlington, Texas
  • Current Vehicle:2001 Ford Mustang GT Convertible

Posted 02 September 2016 - 11:32 AM

I think what he's looking for is something like the BMW X6M

2015-bmw-x6-m-24_653.jpg

 

I too would love a Mustang based, 5 passenger, AWD vehicle like the BMW X6 with either a high output 3.5 EcoBoost or a Coyote 5.0.  It wouldn't have to share the Mustang name.  They could call it a Maverick or come up with some other name (although a Mustang, a Maverick X6 fighter and a Bronco SUV all in the same showroom would be pretty sweet).  

 

I've driven the Explorer Sport, but it's no X6.  It's not even as sporty as a base X5.  The closest I've come to a sporty Ford CUV is the latest Edge Sport.  It's really nice, but I would prefer a RWD biased AWD to a FWD biased AWD.


  • 2b2 and meyeste like this

Art

Current/Recent Fords:
2001 Ford Mustang GT Convertible 4.6L V8 (Purchased New 10/01, my toy, to be sold soon...)
2001 Ford F150 Lariat SuperCrew 4x4 5.4L V8 (Purchased New 06/00 - Sold 06/01/11)
2007 Ford Expedition EL Eddie Bauer 5.4L V8 (Purchased New 05/28/07, wife's daily driver - Sold 06/15/16)

2004 Ford F53 Chassis 6.8L V10 under my 2005 GBM 3500DS Motorhome (Purchased New 10/04 - Sold 09/12/12, replaced with a 2013 Kodiak 300BHSL travel trailer in 10/12)

1995 Ford F150 XLT SuperCab 5.0L V8 (Purchased Used 10/05/12 - Sold 09/23/15)

2014 Ford Fusion Titanium 2.0L EB (Company Car, took delivery on 10/16/14, turned back in 7/24/17)
2014 Ford F150 SVT Raptor SuperCrew 6.2L V8 (Purchased New 12/02/14, my latest toy)

2004 Ford Mustang GT 4.6L V8 (Purchased Used 10/12/15, son's daily driver)

2017 Ford Explorer Limited 2.3L EB (Ordered 7/20/16, took delivery on 09/14/16, wife's daily driver)

2017 Ford Fusion Sport 2.7L EB AWD (Company Car, took delivery on 8/29/17)

Potential Future FoMoCo Products:
2007 Ford Explorer Sport Trac SVT Adrenalin 4.6L V8 Supercharged (Cancelled, never built, R.I.P.)
Class A Motorhome w/a Ford F53 chassis

Facebook

They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security. --Benjamin Franklin


#13 OFFLINE   meyeste

meyeste

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 159 posts
  • Joined 13-August 05
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 04 October 2016 - 08:31 AM

Take a look at the Explorer Sport or Edge Sport...

I have, first the Edge is too small for me. Put an Explorer next to a Mustang and tell me which looks better? Shut off the engineering side of your brain that values functionality - you'll pick the Mustang everytime. Ford turned the Fusion, Mustang into very attractive vehicles that catch your eye, why not do that with the Explorer/Expedition? I get they are pretty useful vehicles with optional engines that make them very quick. I need them to appeal to the right side of my brain as well as the left,  it's an "have it all" world, they need to have it all. Put another way, an Explorer or Expedition - one of which likely will be my next purchase doesn't cost a whole lot less than a Mercedes GLE or GLS (they only European SUV's built well enough to buy IMO) well if I didn't qualify for discounts...objectively on appearance how does either compare? If you ask me a GLE or GLS looks a lot better. If we were to compare a Fusion to a C class Mercedes, I'd say "depends on your preference if you ignore the nameplate", and I don't think I am the only one. The Edge, Explorer, Expedition are competing with Audi, Mercedes, BMW in their higher trim levels, they need to step it up when it comes to the body. Again, I bet there is someone at Ford saying the same thing, I'm backing them up. 

I see the Bronco is coming, I'll definitely have a look, I know it'll be retro and that look has it's attraction - I'm not sure I could live with it ten years.... and while I know there is probably demand for a minimal version - it doesn't come from me - load it UP! 



#14 OFFLINE   akirby

akirby

    fordmantpw's alter ego

  • Moderator
  • 26,210 posts
  • Joined 18-April 06
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:Alpharetta, GA
  • Current Vehicle:2013 Fusion Ti (Ruby Red)

Posted 04 October 2016 - 09:41 AM

I find the Explorer to be one of the best looking utilities out there.   But a box is a box is a box - it will never look like a mustang.   Explorer looks WAY better than Mercedes utes if you ask me, but honestly that's all just personal preferences.



2013 Fusion Titanium (Ruby Red)
2016 Lincoln MKX Reserve (Luxe/Cappucino)

#15 OFFLINE   theoldwizard

theoldwizard

    Retired

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,213 posts
  • Joined 06-February 03
  • Location:SE MI
  • Current Vehicle:'98 E150

Posted 05 October 2016 - 06:40 AM

I have, first the Edge is too small for me.

Take a second look at an Edge Sport ! I have heard the 2.7L EcoBoost is a beast !!  Comfortable seating for 4 adults, and a reasonable cargo area that almost doubles when you fold down the back seats.
 
My problem with the Sport is. that it is set up as a "street fighter" not even close to a SUV.  I would like to see 18" rims with some beefy 235/70R18 "aggressive" tires and a trailer tow option up to 4000-5000 lbs.


Edited by theoldwizard, 05 October 2016 - 06:41 AM.

  • 2b2 likes this

#16 OFFLINE   NLPRacing

NLPRacing

    Blue Oval Enthusiast

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,998 posts
  • Joined 24-October 00
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:Arlington, Texas
  • Current Vehicle:2001 Ford Mustang GT Convertible

Posted 05 October 2016 - 02:19 PM

Take a second look at an Edge Sport ! I have heard the 2.7L EcoBoost is a beast !!  Comfortable seating for 4 adults, and a reasonable cargo area that almost doubles when you fold down the back seats.
 
My problem with the Sport is. that it is set up as a "street fighter" not even close to a SUV.  I would like to see 18" rims with some beefy 235/70R18 "aggressive" tires and a trailer tow option up to 4000-5000 lbs.

 

I've driven both the new Edge Sport and Explorer Sport and they are both great vehicles.  The Edge is definitely the sportier of the two.  I think offering the Edge Titanium's 19" wheel & tire combo as an option should allow it to tow up to 3500 lbs.  Or maybe offer the 2.7 EcoBoost in the Edge Titanium.  

 

If the MKX gets the 400HP 3.0T, that would be worth a look at as a family man's Mustang replacement.


Art

Current/Recent Fords:
2001 Ford Mustang GT Convertible 4.6L V8 (Purchased New 10/01, my toy, to be sold soon...)
2001 Ford F150 Lariat SuperCrew 4x4 5.4L V8 (Purchased New 06/00 - Sold 06/01/11)
2007 Ford Expedition EL Eddie Bauer 5.4L V8 (Purchased New 05/28/07, wife's daily driver - Sold 06/15/16)

2004 Ford F53 Chassis 6.8L V10 under my 2005 GBM 3500DS Motorhome (Purchased New 10/04 - Sold 09/12/12, replaced with a 2013 Kodiak 300BHSL travel trailer in 10/12)

1995 Ford F150 XLT SuperCab 5.0L V8 (Purchased Used 10/05/12 - Sold 09/23/15)

2014 Ford Fusion Titanium 2.0L EB (Company Car, took delivery on 10/16/14, turned back in 7/24/17)
2014 Ford F150 SVT Raptor SuperCrew 6.2L V8 (Purchased New 12/02/14, my latest toy)

2004 Ford Mustang GT 4.6L V8 (Purchased Used 10/12/15, son's daily driver)

2017 Ford Explorer Limited 2.3L EB (Ordered 7/20/16, took delivery on 09/14/16, wife's daily driver)

2017 Ford Fusion Sport 2.7L EB AWD (Company Car, took delivery on 8/29/17)

Potential Future FoMoCo Products:
2007 Ford Explorer Sport Trac SVT Adrenalin 4.6L V8 Supercharged (Cancelled, never built, R.I.P.)
Class A Motorhome w/a Ford F53 chassis

Facebook

They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security. --Benjamin Franklin


#17 OFFLINE   meyeste

meyeste

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 159 posts
  • Joined 13-August 05
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 05 October 2016 - 02:48 PM

Take a second look at an Edge Sport ! I have heard the 2.7L EcoBoost is a beast !!  Comfortable seating for 4 adults, and a reasonable cargo area that almost doubles when you fold down the back seats.
 
My problem with the Sport is. that it is set up as a "street fighter" not even close to a SUV.  I would like to see 18" rims with some beefy 235/70R18 "aggressive" tires and a trailer tow option up to 4000-5000 lbs.

 

I don't have an issue with the actual performance of the Edge or Explorer the 2.7L and 3.5L EB engines are awesome I am big supporter, however they need to look the part, the Explorer is a people mover any way you look at it. I have heard they are going to return it to a RWD platform in the next generation, I am just hoping they put a effort into the body styling as they did with the Fusion and Mustang. 

 

For example take a close look at the Mercedes, BMW's and Audi's wizzing by most are the lowest cost model that can be had - they look the part and most have no idea the difference. Looking the part - might be a sorry picture on the state of affairs,  is more important to many than walking the part. 


Edited by meyeste, 05 October 2016 - 02:58 PM.


#18 OFFLINE   meyeste

meyeste

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 159 posts
  • Joined 13-August 05
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 05 October 2016 - 02:54 PM

I find the Explorer to be one of the best looking utilities out there.   But a box is a box is a box - it will never look like a mustang.   Explorer looks WAY better than Mercedes utes if you ask me, but honestly that's all just personal preferences.

I'm thinking that the upcoming Bronco will be exactly what I am looking for... 

 

I'll take that back, now that it's out - nope. And given there are signs the appetite for the Wrangler is waning I question this vehicle, all I can say is the top had better come off or it will be DOA.


Edited by meyeste, 10 January 2017 - 08:45 AM.

  • NLPRacing likes this

#19 OFFLINE   akirby

akirby

    fordmantpw's alter ego

  • Moderator
  • 26,210 posts
  • Joined 18-April 06
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:Alpharetta, GA
  • Current Vehicle:2013 Fusion Ti (Ruby Red)

Posted 05 October 2016 - 03:05 PM

 

I don't have an issue with the actual performance of the Edge or Explorer the 2.7L and 3.5L EB engines are awesome I am big supporter, however they need to look the part, the Explorer is a people mover any way you look at it. I have heard they are going to return it to a RWD platform in the next generation, I am just hoping they put a effort into the body styling as they did with the Fusion and Mustang. 

 

For example take a close look at the Mercedes, BMW's and Audi's wizzing by most are the lowest cost model that can be had - they look the part and most have no idea the difference. Looking the part - might be a state picture on the state of affairs, but is more important to many than walking the part. 

 

Explorer looks just like a $100K Range Rover.  I've actually mistaken one for the other a few times.   You're not going to style a boxy utility the same as a car.  It's not physically possible.   A Cayenne does not look like a 911.



2013 Fusion Titanium (Ruby Red)
2016 Lincoln MKX Reserve (Luxe/Cappucino)

#20 OFFLINE   BORG

BORG

    Blue Oval Enthusiast

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 8,149 posts
  • Joined 19-September 99
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:None
  • Current Vehicle:None

Posted 05 October 2016 - 04:42 PM

Sounds like you want a Porsche Cayenne which is the closest to a Mustang SUV as you can probably get from a aesthetic and performance standpoint.  

 

Ford SUVs will never be that exotic, they are based on less exotic economical FWD platforms with a utilitarian non-luxury customer. 

 

And in what way is a Bronco anything like a Mustang SUV exactly?  I can't think of anything that is more opposite. 


Edited by BORG, 05 October 2016 - 04:53 PM.









Custom Search


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Privacy Policy Terms of Service ·