Jump to content

Chrysler to cease the production of the 200 sedan model early 2017 at the latest..also Pacifica to spawn 300 replacement?


silvrsvt

Recommended Posts

http://www.inautonews.com/chrysler-to-cease-the-production-of-the-200-sedan-model-early-2017-at-the-latest

 

Saw this interesting tidbit:

 

Sergio Marchionne visited last week the Windsor Assembly Plant to officially celebrate the launch of the new Chrysler Pacifica minivan and to thank the 6,000 workers that brought the vehicle to market, which went into production at the end of February. The Pacifica platform could also be used for the next generation Chrysler 300 large sedan. “This plant and this architecture are capable of making the 300 successor, the front-wheel, all-wheel drive successor,” Marchionne added.

 

So much for a RWD full sized Sedan...though I doubt FCA will be around long enough that they'll even be able to replace the 300

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.inautonews.com/chrysler-to-cease-the-production-of-the-200-sedan-model-early-2017-at-the-latest

 

Saw this interesting tidbit:

 

 

 

So much for a RWD full sized Sedan...though I doubt FCA will be around long enough that they'll even be able to replace the 300

 

 

That's old news, initially that was the plan but now all Dodge/Chrysler sedans will be rwd (or at least Charger) while on the AR platform while 200/Dart are contract build. Edited by Fgts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Toyota and Honda still sell plenty of FWD cars, so they aren't going anywhere. But Fiat* just kicked their Dart/200 out the door thinking import buyers would come, thinking "it's Italian!, foreign, so it has to be good" but no way!

 

*Chrysler is just a legacy name now, they may as well just call all their non-Jeep/Rams, 'Fiats"

 

I'd bet that next gen 300 will be AWD only, to placate RWD fans**, but to also to go along with 4x4 crazy market.

Audi does fine without a 'true RWD luxury sedan', in fact they mostly sell SUV's.

 

**BTW, where are the "RWD loyalists' who were going to buy 300's in "bundles" after the end of Panther?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The large sedan market in the US is disappearing faster than the polar icecaps. Everyone who may buy one is probably buying their last one now. There won't be anyone to replace these buyers in the pipeline 5 or 6 years from now.

 

If Chrysler wants to sell a sedan, it may make sense to make one that is sized between 200 and 300 and try skim both segments. But I don't see them plowing good money after bad to do another Dodge Charger. Maybe they keep the current Charger around indefinitely but I don't think we'll see anything based on that Alfa platform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they do an FWD/AWD 300 sedan, they could also do a wagony/CUVish thing as well and that probably would sell and that would be the product I'd push the most at this point because...Damn, they're out of options and time.

 

They'll make more money selling that as a Jeep. Which is what they will do.

 

The FWD one is Jeep Wagoneer.

 

The RWD one is Jeep Grand Wagoneer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The large sedan market in the US is disappearing faster than the polar icecaps. Everyone who may buy one is probably buying their last one now. There won't be anyone to replace these buyers in the pipeline 5 or 6 years from now.

But yet the Taurus has been up 26% this year so far ;)

 

Most older folks (55+) are buying small CUV's...so basically the Escape is new Crown Vic for the Baby Boomer Generation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But yet the Taurus has been up 26% this year so far ;)

 

That increase is due in large part to Ford NAFLRO clinching some significant wins with fleet customer accounts in early 2016. It's not indicative of a long term trend.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From all the stuff I read from the FCA inside guys the 300 will remain rwd. Interesting sidenote the Pacifica minivan platform is supposed to accommodate rwd/fwd/awd and it's separate from the new AR platform.

 

Notice in the article S.M. said FCA is "not committed yet" on a fwd or rwd 300, he's blowing a bit of smoke here.

 

 

IMO i believe a larger,fwd/awd (maybe rwd) "Imperial" car is on the way but it's not the 300s total replacement. With the 200 totally dead and Chrysler 100 still possibly in play a 2-3 sedan lineup is still manageable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From all the stuff I read from the FCA inside guys the 300 will remain rwd. Interesting sidenote the Pacifica minivan platform is supposed to accommodate rwd/fwd/awd and it's separate from the new AR platform.

 

Notice in the article S.M. said FCA is "not committed yet" on a fwd or rwd 300, he's blowing a bit of smoke here.

 

 

IMO i believe a larger,fwd/awd (maybe rwd) "Imperial" car is on the way but it's not the 300s total replacement. With the 200 totally dead and Chrysler 100 still possibly in play a 2-3 sedan lineup is still manageable.

 

Given what is going on with FCA, this is pie in the sky thinking.

 

I don't see them really investing in anything but Jeep or RAM at this point, since that is where the $$$ is coming from.

 

I doubt they'll find anyone willing to build the 200 or Dart for them, unless they are Chinese.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From all the stuff I read from the FCA inside guys the 300 will remain rwd. Interesting sidenote the Pacifica minivan platform is supposed to accommodate rwd/fwd/awd and it's separate from the new AR platform.

 

Notice in the article S.M. said FCA is "not committed yet" on a fwd or rwd 300, he's blowing a bit of smoke here.

 

 

IMO i believe a larger,fwd/awd (maybe rwd) "Imperial" car is on the way but it's not the 300s total replacement. With the 200 totally dead and Chrysler 100 still possibly in play a 2-3 sedan lineup is still manageable.

 

LOL transverse engine RWD platform? Stop making stuff up :lol2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

LOL transverse engine RWD platform? Stop making stuff up :lol2:

??, for a bit of auto history the old LH platform (Intrepid, LHS, etc...) was fwd/awd/rwd capable, more so the LX platform is based off of the LH rather then the myth of being on an E-Class platform. In other words it can be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Given what is going on with FCA, this is pie in the sky thinking.

 

I don't see them really investing in anything but Jeep or RAM at this point, since that is where the $$$ is coming from.

 

.

If the car is based off the minivan or the AR platform why is it impossible?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the LX platform is based off of the LH rather then the myth of being on an E-Class platform.

 

The LX platform is Chrysler's full-size rear wheel drive automobile platform for the mid part of the first decade of the 21st century. The LX was developed in America to supersede the previous Chrysler LH platform, which had been designed to allow it to be easily upgraded to rear and all-wheel drive. Many Mercedes components were incorporated, including the Mercedes-Benz W220 S-class control arm front suspension, the Mercedes-Benz W211[1] E-Class 5-link rear suspension, the firewall and floor pan, the W5A580 5-speed automatic, the rear differential, and the ESP system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

??, for a bit of auto history the old LH platform (Intrepid, LHS, etc...) was fwd/awd/rwd capable, more so the LX platform is based off of the LH rather then the myth of being on an E-Class platform. In other words it can be done.

 

You don't know what you are talking about so just stop.

 

LH had longitude engine which makes it theoretically possible if you want to convert it to RWD.

 

Pacifica is CUSW which has transverse engine. There won't be RWD 300 based on Pacifica platform. The engine is sitting in the wrong direction for that to happen. In order to change CUSW to RWD, you would have to change everything about the platform, which means it will be a new platform essentially. So no, "Pacifica platform" (which is the same platform as Cherokee, 200, and Dart) cannot accommodate FWD and RWD without major engineering work.

Edited by bzcat
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You don't know what you are talking about so just stop.

 

LH had longitude engine which makes it theoretically possible if you want to convert it to RWD.

 

"When the original LH was being designed, there was an LX platform that was configurable as AWD, FWD and RWD by swapping components around. Three LX prototypes with V8 engines and ZF AWD transaxles were remade as "Premier" police cars, and crashed on the TV series Viper""

 

http://www.allpar.com/model/lh2/index.html

 

Stick with Ford information, ok?.

 

Pacifica is CUSW which has transverse engine. There won't be RWD 300 based on Pacifica platform. The engine is sitting in the wrong direction for that to happen. In order to change CUSW to RWD, you would have to change everything about the platform, which means it will be a new platform essentially. So no, "Pacifica platform" (which is the same platform as Cherokee, 200, and Dart) cannot accommodate FWD and RWD without major engineering work.

I'm reiterating what the FCA guys are saying, by all means go get an job application to FCA engineering department and tell em what they can't do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"When the original LH was being designed, there was an LX platform that was configurable as AWD, FWD and RWD by swapping components around. Three LX prototypes with V8 engines and ZF AWD transaxles were remade as "Premier" police cars, and crashed on the TV series Viper""

 

 

Huge difference in doing a couple prototypes vs an actual production car. You can stuff a V8 into a Focus and make it RWD, but you can't make a production car out of it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Huge difference in doing a couple prototypes vs an actual production car. You can stuff a V8 into a Focus and make it RWD, but you can't make a production car out of it.

Can't believe I'm answering this, the "Premiers" were driving prototypes of the actual design study for a production awd/rwd/fwd sedan(s), which led to LX and an original MY 2001 launch before Benz got involved, not a "one-off" performance kit like V8 Focus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"When the original LH was being designed, there was an LX platform that was configurable as AWD, FWD and RWD by swapping components around. Three LX prototypes with V8 engines and ZF AWD transaxles were remade as "Premier" police cars, and crashed on the TV series Viper""

 

http://www.allpar.com/model/lh2/index.html

 

Stick with Ford information, ok?.

 

 

I'm reiterating what the FCA guys are saying, by all means go get an job application to FCA engineering department and tell em what they can't do.

 

I already explained to you why RWD was possible on LH. It's the orientation of the engine. RWD is not possible on CUSW.

 

I don't know why you keep referring to the LH platform... it contradicts your made up assertion that FCA is going to make a RWD 300 based on Pacifica.

 

But I'm beginning to suspect that you simply do not understand what longitude and transverse mean.

 

And if there are "FCA guys" saying that besides you, then they are just as clueless as you.

Edited by bzcat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...