Cobra12 Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 I could be wrong but if I remember right isn't the 6900 what you get if you worked 40hrs a week every week of the year? Like your hours added up need to be the equivalent of that or higher for the full amount. You can't make more then the 6900. Is that correct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tooltime Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 I could be wrong but if I remember right isn't the 6900 what you get if you worked 40hrs a week every week of the year? Like your hours added up need to be the equivalent of that or higher for the full amount. You can't make more then the 6900. Is that correct? I have cleared $13,000 profit sharing the past 2 years as well as most trades,,,,,, thanks to AWS and overtime opportunities Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlecountry Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 I have cleared $13,000 profit sharing the past 2 years as well as most trades,,,,,, thanks to AWS and overtime opportunities Why are you bragging? I can hear those 2nd Tier now saying they have been wronged! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tier2 Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Ok since you know it all, enjoy your $6900 I'll get more.I worked OT, I had to see what it felt like to make tier 1 wages a few times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlecountry Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 I'll get more.I worked OT, I had to see what it felt like to make tier 1 wages a few times. Hope you put money in TESPHE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 Knock off the personal attacks. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobra12 Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 Thank you tool time for helping answer my question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobra12 Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 My money is going toward a new mustang lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveyb Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 Our money is Coming from the new Mustangs, so you go, Cobra! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RougeWelder Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 Knock off the personal attacks. I totally agree akirby. Unfortunately, if you read this tier2 guys other posts on other threads, he is consistently attacking tier 1 employee's. I have no doubt that tier2 was more than happy to accept a job that paid $15/hr. but after doing the work and feeling the pain, he feels wronged by the compensation he is getting. Due to his personal attacks on the very people that allowed him to get his job and made concessions for his hiring and are currently fighting to get him compensated to tier 1 levels, he deserves whatever goes his way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RougeWelder Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 I'll get more.I worked OT, I had to see what it felt like to make tier 1 wages a few times. You will never know what it is like to make tier 1 wages until the tier one people win the fight to get tier2 equal to tier1. Tier 1 people work overtime too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 I totally agree akirby. Unfortunately, if you read this tier2 guys other posts on other threads, he is consistently attacking tier 1 employee's. I have no doubt that tier2 was more than happy to accept a job that paid $15/hr. but after doing the work and feeling the pain, he feels wronged by the compensation he is getting. Due to his personal attacks on the very people that allowed him to get his job and made concessions for his hiring and are currently fighting to get him compensated to tier 1 levels, he deserves whatever goes his way. I would be irritated, too, but that doesn't justify personal attacks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tier2 Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 I totally agree akirby. Unfortunately, if you read this tier2 guys other posts on other threads, he is consistently attacking tier 1 employee's. I have no doubt that tier2 was more than happy to accept a job that paid $15/hr. but after doing the work and feeling the pain, he feels wronged by the compensation he is getting. Due to his personal attacks on the very people that allowed him to get his job and made concessions for his hiring and are currently fighting to get him compensated to tier 1 levels, he deserves whatever goes his way. Actually if you read all my post, my problem is with the tier 1 employees who say they will vote no if they don't get a raise and tier 2 does. Also I already stated I accepted the job knowing that the wage scale has the ability to change this contract. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pioneer Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 Actually if you read all my post, my problem is with the tier 1 employees who say they will vote no if they don't get a raise and tier 2 does. Also I already stated I accepted the job knowing that the wage scale has the ability to change this contract. Hypothetical question. How would you vote if the contract raised your wages, but lowered Tier 1's? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTPwife Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 (edited) What a bummer that the divide and conquer tactic is working Edited January 31, 2015 by MTPwife Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tier2 Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 Hypothetical question. How would you vote if the contract raised your wages, but lowered Tier 1's? I'd vote no. Wages shouldn't be lowered, but the gap between the two is too big and needs to close. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTP'er Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 Its not just the company that wants " divide and conquer " the IUAW wants it too !! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzymoomoo Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 Its not just the company that wants " divide and conquer " the IUAW wants it too !! I don't doub what you are claiming, but how does that benefit them? It doesn't make sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlecountry Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 I'd vote no. Wages shouldn't be lowered, but the gap between the two is too big and needs to close. How would you vote if Tier 1 and Tier 2 got a raise , keep in mind it keeps the gap between the two Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tier2 Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 How would you vote if Tier 1 and Tier 2 got a raise , keep in mind it keeps the gap between the two I'd vote yes, as long as the gap closed. I'd be fine with tier2 being at around 24-25/hr if the company contributed more than 4% to our tesphe. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlecountry Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 I'd vote yes, as long as the gap closed. I'd be fine with tier2 being at around 24-25/hr if the company contributed more than 4% to our tesphe. 4% is the norm for most company's to contribute! Why are you trying to make the company go broke? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTP'er Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 In the united states you have the democrats and the republicans and in the UAW you have the green slate and then everybody else. The green slate are the wannabes and the everyone else just want a fair contract. So why did the IUAW divide the membership good question. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tier2 Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 4% is the norm for most company's to contribute! Why are you trying to make the company go broke? Actually most companies contribute 0%. I'd be fine with $25/hr and 5% contribution with profit share and inflation protection bonus for the next 15 years. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlecountry Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Actually most companies contribute 0%. I'd be fine with $25/hr and 5% contribution with profit share and inflation protection bonus for the next 15 years. WoW! 2nd Tier asking for the world! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tier2 Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 WoW! 2nd Tier asking for the world! Yeah right. That is very fair for the company and the employees. Pensions are off the company books so they can more than afford that for current and future employees while staying profitable and competitive. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.