Jump to content

Custom Search





Coming Up Next:
Lincoln Continental • Lincoln Aviator


Welcome to Blue Oval Forums


Sign In  Log in with Facebook

Create Account
Welcome to Blue Oval Forums.  You must first register to create topics and post replies. Registration is a quick and easy process and only takes a minute.  Be apart of Blue Oval Forums by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members
  • Create a photo album and post images
  • Use the Shout feature and more. . .
Click here to create an account now.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

5.0 undesirable?


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#21 OFFLINE   jeff355

jeff355

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 25 posts
  • Joined 25-February 07

Posted 12 August 2014 - 07:24 PM

That may be true, but the original post asks about the 5.0L, not ecoboost or diesels. 

 

Thats a whole nother debate !









Lose this advertisement by becoming a member. Click here to create a free account.


#22 OFFLINE   akirby

akirby

    fordmantpw's alter ego

  • Moderator
  • 25,502 posts
  • Joined 18-April 06
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:Alpharetta, GA
  • Current Vehicle:2013 Fusion Ti (Ruby Red)

Posted 12 August 2014 - 07:47 PM

That may be true, but the original post asks about the 5.0L, not ecoboost or diesels. 

 

Thats a whole nother debate !

 

You're the one that brought it up - I was just replying to your post!



2013 Fusion Titanium (Ruby Red)
2016 Lincoln MKX Reserve (Luxe/Cappucino)

#23 OFFLINE   edselford

edselford

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 73 posts
  • Joined 04-February 07

Posted 25 February 2015 - 03:04 PM

Looks like the new 5.2 liter V8 with the flat crankshaft, in the mustang is a cross between the 5.0 and the 5.8 liter.  The pictures seem to indicate that Ford is utilizing the 5.8l bore without liners and a stroke around 95mm, ie  93.5mm bore and 95mm stroke. Must be utilizing the iron spray process directly on the aluminum bore. i can't figure out the deck height though.

 

Any thoughts???



#24 OFFLINE   92merc

92merc

    Blue Oval Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPip
  • 1,662 posts
  • Joined 19-October 05
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:Bismarck, ND
  • Current Vehicle:2007Mercury Montego : 2003 F150 SuperCrew

Posted 25 February 2015 - 04:45 PM

I don't know that the bore is the same.  But the 5.2 has the spray in liner for sure.



#25 OFFLINE   30 OTT 6

30 OTT 6

    Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPip
  • 605 posts
  • Joined 04-August 02
  • Region:Canada Ontario
  • Location:Chatham, ON
  • Current Vehicle:2006 Ford Focus ZX5

Posted 05 March 2015 - 10:48 AM

The bore on Voodoo was increased to 94mm mainly due to the Plasma Transfer Wire Arc liners.

 

Ford will need to lift the deck to get more displacement out of the Coyote/Voodoo block.


photo-thumb-15254.jpg

Gone too fast, Nick.

 

 

2001 Mustang GT Bullitt #1924 DHG
All Stock
13.89 @ 102.1 mph

2006 Ford Focus ZX5
Silver, 5 Sp MTX
'Charlie don't surf'

 

2017 Honda CB500XA


#26 OFFLINE   meyeste

meyeste

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 140 posts
  • Joined 13-August 05
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 24 May 2015 - 02:14 PM

 

I don't think too many people are nostalgic about the 2.3T in the 80's Mustangs.  There's a reason they were only offered for a few years.  The 2.3 was going to exist whether the Mustang used it or not, as there is a need for it in other vehicles.  More than likely, it just happened to check all the boxes that were needed in the Mustang also, so there it is.

The reason there is nostalgia for the SVO was that the SVO was faster than the GT of the time, not because anyone particularly liked a turbo. 



#27 OFFLINE   badams

badams

    New BON Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Joined 21-October 15
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • Location:CT
  • Current Vehicle:F150

Posted 21 October 2015 - 09:44 AM

I debated between the 3.7 ecoboost and the 5.0 on my new F150.  I have yet to recieve it, but was glad to settle on the 5.0  I actually trust Ford, and believe their turbos will run well for a good service life.  But, I wanted the simplicity and durablilty the 5.0 provides, and its a modest MPG hit, so I was pleased to make teh 5.0 choice.  I suspect many are doing the same.


  • J-150 likes this

#28 OFFLINE   White99GT

White99GT

    Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPip
  • 1,282 posts
  • Joined 01-January 02
  • Region:U.S. Southern Plains
  • Location:Gulf Coast
  • Current Vehicle:2001 Ford F150 Supercrew

Posted 22 July 2017 - 04:24 AM

If you are thinking of a 5.0L Coyote , dont think twice- It is the best engine ever put in an F150 IMO and gets no marketing whatsoever.
 
Ive had old 5.0s, 5.8s,  5.4s, 5.4 3valves and this engine is better, is good on fuel,  revs like a chevy, and has a sound that an ecoboost just cant beat !
 
Twin turbo 6cyl in my truck ?  Never.   Let me know how that works out after your warranty is up.
 
Trucks are supposed to have a v8.


Revs like a Chevy? So you're saying the 5.0 is a slow, laborious, rough revver? Sorry, couldn't resist. :-)
  • MY93SHO likes this








Custom Search


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Privacy Policy Terms of Service ·