Jump to content

Jimmy Settles


MTP'er

Recommended Posts

Wow Jimmy they sure did make you look like a bumbling fool of Fox 2 today. So you better take heed you bumbling fool cause your out of touch with the membership.

to frank!! who the hell isn't downtown. union membership is not be allowed to vote for the big issues, like our president, etc.... they want us to vote democratic but we (union) live the socialist life (in the union) vote as we tell you, we know whats in your best interest... do what we say not what we do! not sure how we can change, many unhappy members. need new people up top, but we (union) have NO say as to who holds these positions, that sounds very UNDEMOCRATIC!!!

Edited by jerrymaker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 things I took from that video.

 

Settles is a thug. All he wanted to do is intimidate people by stepping into them and getting loud.

 

350 people at International making 100k+? Seriously? Why no cutbacks there?

 

The workers from Chattanooga and the guy in the white shirt have a point. What can our union offer other workers that they don't already have? We have given back in the past three contracts and our representatives take more from us every month without asking our opinion. Then they go back on their promise that all additional income goes directly to the strike fund.

 

Next contract will be interesting for sure.

 

Nobody wants to leave the union in Michigan when our right to work option kicks in? You sure about that Jimmy?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 things I took from that video.

 

Settles is a thug. All he wanted to do is intimidate people by stepping into them and getting loud.

 

350 people at International making 100k+? Seriously? Why no cutbacks there?

 

The workers from Chattanooga and the guy in the white shirt have a point. What can our union offer other workers that they don't already have? We have given back in the past three contracts and our representatives take more from us every month without asking our opinion. Then they go back on their promise that all additional income goes directly to the strike fund.

 

Next contract will be interesting for sure.

 

Nobody wants to leave the union in Michigan when our right to work option kicks in? You sure about that Jimmy?

 

 

Nailed it.

 

Maybe Jimmy means no one at the IUAW wants to opt out.

The people actually paying the dues I think otherwise.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 things I took from that video.

 

Settles is a thug. All he wanted to do is intimidate people by stepping into them and getting loud.

 

350 people at International making 100k+? Seriously? Why no cutbacks there?

 

The workers from Chattanooga and the guy in the white shirt have a point. What can our union offer other workers that they don't already have? We have given back in the past three contracts and our representatives take more from us every month without asking our opinion. Then they go back on their promise that all additional income goes directly to the strike fund.

 

Next contract will be interesting for sure.

 

Nobody wants to leave the union in Michigan when our right to work option kicks in? You sure about that Jimmy?

 

I kinda like that Jimmy went after Leduff. I didn't like the piece he did on the Volkswagen organizing and he seems like the run your mouth and hide behind the camera's type. Maybe Chuck and jimmy could step out back and handle things. I'd pay to see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your paying an extra half hour a month to see it.

 

So are you correct?

 

I'm not a big fan of Jimmy or the decisions he makes, but I'm not a fan of Leduff and his whole act either.

Edited by MI451
Link to comment
Share on other sites

my problem was how the questions are asked, typical republican banter, get real!

 

 

With no answers to any of them.

At least one of them did their homework and had some points of contention.

 

( Not Jimmy )

 

 

Jimmy looked clueless and he is not an actor but nailed it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

true, but in that atmosphere that i saw, and watched, none of them were looking for answers. two reasons u ask a question, either u want an answer or ur askin to start a controversy. i hardly believe that any of them WANTED an answer, and that is not how u get a legit question answered.

as far as your opinions, they are noted, but very questionable at best.....

i also know u have a ulterior motive in this, so that also comes into play.

Edited by dark271
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

true, but in that atmosphere that i saw, and watched, none of them were looking for answers. two reasons u ask a question, either u want an answer or ur askin to start a controversy. i hardly believe that any of them WANTED an answer, and that is not how u get a legit question answered.

as far as your opinions, they are noted, but very questionable at best.....

i also know u have a ulterior motive in this, so that also comes into play.

 

 

When you attend or are part of a public demonstration you should expect the media to take photographs & video and ask questions.

When you behave badly or have no answers to reasonable questions it makes your position appear weak and ill informed.

 

I never met Settles and know nothing of the man personally but his lack of professionalism , in public , made him and the demonstration look bad.

Public PR is an art and people that can not pull it off should work behind the scenes rather than look a fool publicly .

 

My only "motive" is that my dues is funding the things that come out of his mouth or his embarrassing behavior in public.

Good luck in that inspiring the organizing of any new members.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

again, your ideas seem a bit skewed in a certain direction...he was not part of the public demonstation, looks like he was trying to talk to a few of the members there demonstrating against him(hostile area) so even if the questions seem legit, maybe they are, however cause of the area, and how they are asked, doesnt reflect a good 'reasonable' atmosphere to answer ANY question.

i stand by what i said earlier

u have other motives at work here. i know this.

i have met settles, but my opinion is irrelevent. and so is yours.

the media tend to slant things either right or left, or how they want to, this is a typical slant(against anything the union say/does)

uaw's image, ways of doing things, must change. i agree with this, even more co-operation is needed with the company.

 

change in the laws is also needed.

europe is a good example, where unions and companies have a good balance together(more in Germany, however is some other areas also)

for us to go back to the stand off ways of 1960, is a backward move, and wont get us anywhere.

 

 

 

When you attend or are part of a public demonstration you should expect the media to take photographs & video and ask questions.

When you behave badly or have no answers to reasonable questions it makes your position appear weak and ill informed.

 

I never met Settles and know nothing of the man personally but his lack of professionalism , in public , made him and the demonstration look bad.

Public PR is an art and people that can not pull it off should work behind the scenes rather than look a fool publicly .

 

My only "motive" is that my dues is funding the things that come out of his mouth or his embarrassing behavior in public.

Good luck in that inspiring the organizing of any new members.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jimmy settles agreed to a side deal for two tier trades at flat rock.

....really? Could you elaborate......trades 2nd tier pay/benefits? I have not heard about that but nothing they do suprises me anymore. It is obvious that union leadership is out for themselves now. I asked one of them a question when they came around the plant. "When the unions foundation was built on the idea that United we stand, divided we fall.....why did they divide us with tier 1 and tier 2 workers?" What I got was some energized politi-speak which danced around the question. I am starting to think that Bob King and his cronies are company guys planted into the union heirarchy 30 some years ago.:):):)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...