Jump to content

Custom Search





Coming Up Next:
Lincoln Aviator


Welcome to Blue Oval Forums


Sign In  Log in with Facebook

Create Account
Welcome to Blue Oval Forums.  You must first register to create topics and post replies. Registration is a quick and easy process and only takes a minute.  Be apart of Blue Oval Forums by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members
  • Create a photo album and post images
  • Use the Shout feature and more. . .
Click here to create an account now.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

Ford up 6%, Industry reports September sales


  • Please log in to reply
98 replies to this topic

#21 OFFLINE   SoonerLS

SoonerLS

    trying to plug a hole in the universe

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,519 posts
  • Joined 20-June 11
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:Norman
  • Current Vehicle:Lincoln LS, '13 F150 STX

Posted 01 October 2013 - 01:55 PM

Ranger and Crown Vic are WAY down though.  Not sure how much longer they'll last.......

Boy, they aren't selling well at all, are they?  :sos: :banvictory:


  • Mark B. Morrow likes this

photo-thumb-15254.jpg

So, give it over, take a break
Shut your hole, you're causing my poor heart to ache
To all you saints and sinners, you losers and you winners
Here's to one more day above the roses
-- Gaelic Storm, One More Day Above the Roses

 








Lose this advertisement by becoming a member. Click here to create a free account.


#22 OFFLINE   akirby

akirby

    fordmantpw's alter ego

  • Moderator
  • 26,337 posts
  • Joined 18-April 06
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:Alpharetta, GA
  • Current Vehicle:2013 Fusion Ti (Ruby Red)

Posted 01 October 2013 - 03:03 PM

Boy, they aren't selling well at all, are they?  :sos: :banvictory:

 

Lack of advertising......


  • NLPRacing, Mark B. Morrow and SoonerLS like this

2013 Fusion Titanium (Ruby Red)
2016 Lincoln MKX Reserve (Luxe/Cappucino)

#23 OFFLINE   jpd80

jpd80

    Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,114 posts
  • Joined 02-June 04
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:My Happy Place
  • Current Vehicle:Falcon 302 V8

Posted 01 October 2013 - 03:20 PM

Looking at Escape sales how are they going to maintain those numbers plus have the MKC? Escape is looking to hit almost 300K in sales in the U.S. alone.

Plant is running three shifts, sales are dropping away over the fall and winter,

so this is a great time to build out inventory so that there is production room

for the new MKC. Bottom line -Start off Spring with big inventory and trade on it.

 

 

GM September sales:

 

Chevrolet 127,785

 

GMC 29,959

 

Buick 15,623

 

Cadillac 13,828

 

Total GM 187,195


Edited by jpd80, 01 October 2013 - 03:25 PM.


#24 OFFLINE   Biker16

Biker16

    Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,999 posts
  • Joined 29-April 00
  • Location:Cleveland OH
  • Current Vehicle:2012 Ford Focus

Posted 01 October 2013 - 05:38 PM

MKZ outsold ATS and CTS...again.

but is the MKz a better car?  I don't think so.


  • ehaase and EBFlex like this
When did the forum ban horse-switching, goal-post-moving, and unrealistic and irrational posts?Md3ulw.gif <p>

Banned October 2016.

Go tribe!  

#25 OFFLINE   aneekr

aneekr

    Plain Old Dood

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,830 posts
  • Joined 10-January 07
  • Region:U.S. Great Lakes
  • Location:Indianapolis
  • Current Vehicle:none

Posted 01 October 2013 - 05:58 PM

but is the MKz a better car?  I don't think so.

 

I don't either, though ATS is in a different product segment (compact sports sedan). The MKZ sales figure last month was exceeded by its most direct competitor, Lexus ES, by nearly 2,000 units. 


  • EBFlex likes this

Ford Motor Company investor since 2000. Cancer survivor since 2014!


#26 OFFLINE   Edstock

Edstock

    Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 11,207 posts
  • Joined 22-April 04
  • Location:Oakville, Ontario
  • Current Vehicle:2005 Pontiac Wave

Posted 01 October 2013 - 06:12 PM

I don't either, though ATS is in a different product segment (compact sports sedan). The MKZ sales figure last month was exceeded by its most direct competitor, Lexus ES, by nearly 2,000 units. 

 

Ya gotta believe what ya gotta believe. I believe the MKZ will be closing in on “its most direct competitor” as the months go by and Lincoln re-builds its product line and its dealerships, which, as you already know, are decades behind Lexus and the rest for the required ambience for inflated egos. However, it seems the market likes this inferior MKZ. Time will tell, won't it? :)


wing1small2.JPG

 


#27 OFFLINE   aneekr

aneekr

    Plain Old Dood

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,830 posts
  • Joined 10-January 07
  • Region:U.S. Great Lakes
  • Location:Indianapolis
  • Current Vehicle:none

Posted 01 October 2013 - 06:34 PM

Time will tell, won't it? :)

 

Yes indeed! :)


Ford Motor Company investor since 2000. Cancer survivor since 2014!


#28 OFFLINE   papilgee4evaeva

papilgee4evaeva

    La Voz de Razón

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,499 posts
  • Joined 07-September 07
  • Region:U.S. Southern Atlantic
  • Location:Research Triangle, NC
  • Current Vehicle:2005 Buick Rainier CXL; 2013 Ford Fusion Titanium

Posted 01 October 2013 - 08:24 PM

but is the MKz a better car?  I don't think so.

 

Bottom line: "Depends on what you want."


  • SoonerLS likes this

CURRENT VEHICLES
2005 Buick Rainier CXL V8, 158K (mine)
2013 Ford Fusion Titanium, 48k (wife's)

PREVIOUS VEHICLES

1999 Nissan Maxima SE Limited, 188K (wife's; donated)

2001 Pontiac Bonneville SLE, 126K (the Cruise Missile; started getting gremlins, plus we outgrew it)

1996 Nissan Pathfinder SE 4WD, 111-160K+ (stupid odometer) (sold to make room for the Bonnie)
1995 Dodge Intrepid (wife's; almost everything that could go wrong did; towed away stealthily)

FUTURE VEHICLES?

Some other sort of three-row family hauler (for us)

6th-gen Ford Mustang GT Coupe? (for me)


#29 OFFLINE   Moosetang

Moosetang

    Blue Oval Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPip
  • 1,285 posts
  • Joined 30-October 07

Posted 01 October 2013 - 08:27 PM

but is the MKz a better car?  I don't think so.

How much did CTS, the new CTS, and the ATS cost to develop and put into production? How much the MKZ? 


 65,844,610 > 62,979,636 


#30 OFFLINE   jasonj80

jasonj80

    Junior Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPip
  • 2,485 posts
  • Joined 12-December 04

Posted 01 October 2013 - 09:41 PM

You're only talking about a few thousand MKC's a month, or about 10-15% of Escape volume.  If it comes down to Ford trading Escape volume for higher-margin MKC volume, the decision there is easy.  


They are going to have to trade it, I don' t think there is another option. It makes sense in the business case for short term profits. The issue is when someone that was going to buy and Escape can't get what they want and goes and gets a CRV/Rav4, that customer could be gone for life and never into a Lincoln. I think 300K Escapes a year plus 30-40K MKC's is a real number for the US if sales keep increasing like is projected over the next few years. The MKC will be Lincoln's best selling vehicle.


Edited by jasonj80, 01 October 2013 - 09:52 PM.


#31 OFFLINE   RichardJensen

RichardJensen

    Does whatever a SpiderPig does

  • Moderator
  • 35,308 posts
  • Joined 02-September 04
  • Location:Sioux Falls, SD
  • Current Vehicle:2000 Mercury Sable

Posted 01 October 2013 - 09:47 PM


They are going to have to trade it, I don' t think there is another option. It makes sense in the business case for short term profits. The issue is when someone that was going to buy and Escape can't get what they want and goes and gets a CRV/Rav4, that customer could be gone for live and never into a Lincoln.

 

Well, you have the same issue when it comes to price. 'If you don't knock another $1,000 off the price of X, then Y will get the sale instead, and you may lose that customer for life.'


photo-thumb-15254.jpg


#32 OFFLINE   jasonj80

jasonj80

    Junior Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPip
  • 2,485 posts
  • Joined 12-December 04

Posted 01 October 2013 - 10:04 PM

Well, you have the same issue when it comes to price. 'If you don't knock another $1,000 off the price of X, then Y will get the sale instead, and you may lose that customer for life.'


Not really, from consumer studies standpoint. A person that is shopping on price isn't a customer for life, next time they will buy the cheapest thing they can find. It took Ford a while to realize that but Ford's Escape/Fusion/Focus ATP's are proving that people pay for better cars. Never compete on price alone, it is a race to the bottom. 



#33 OFFLINE   RichardJensen

RichardJensen

    Does whatever a SpiderPig does

  • Moderator
  • 35,308 posts
  • Joined 02-September 04
  • Location:Sioux Falls, SD
  • Current Vehicle:2000 Mercury Sable

Posted 01 October 2013 - 10:38 PM


Not really, from consumer studies standpoint. A person that is shopping on price isn't a customer for life, next time they will buy the cheapest thing they can find. It took Ford a while to realize that but Ford's Escape/Fusion/Focus ATP's are proving that people pay for better cars. Never compete on price alone, it is a race to the bottom. 

 

Fine.

 

But how is this 'short term' thinking? If Ford loses a small number of potential repeat Ford customers in order to gain the a roughly similar number of more profitable repeat Lincoln customers.................................


  • NickF1011 likes this

photo-thumb-15254.jpg


#34 OFFLINE   jpd80

jpd80

    Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,114 posts
  • Joined 02-June 04
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:My Happy Place
  • Current Vehicle:Falcon 302 V8

Posted 02 October 2013 - 02:03 AM


They are going to have to trade it, I don' t think there is another option. It makes sense in the business case for short term profits. The issue is when someone that was going to buy and Escape can't get what they want and goes and gets a CRV/Rav4, that customer could be gone for life and never into a Lincoln. I think 300K Escapes a year plus 30-40K MKC's is a real number for the US if sales keep increasing like is projected over the next few years. The MKC will be Lincoln's best selling vehicle.

Provided that Ford continues to build Escape on three shifts through winter, the increased inventory is how Ford

will continue supplying Escape to dealers while having enough MKC per month to satisfy Lincoln.

 

It's pretty much how Ford has got through with Fusion and MKZ so far,

if combined sales of Escape/MKC are less than Fusion/MKZ,

I think that Louisville on three shifts will cope.

 

Even if supply tightens slightly, that is always good for drying up incentives,

something Ford has used to great effect in recent years, more than maximizing sales...



#35 OFFLINE   jpd80

jpd80

    Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,114 posts
  • Joined 02-June 04
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:My Happy Place
  • Current Vehicle:Falcon 302 V8

Posted 02 October 2013 - 02:33 AM

FYI, from the Ford sales conference:

 

 

Erich Merkle

Thank you Jenny. And to take care of some housekeeping items, we'll take a look here in terms of our fleet as a percent of our

total sales. So if we take a look at the month of September, our fleet, total fleet as a percent of our total sales was 27%,

commercial, was 11% of our total sales, government was 5% and rental was 11%.

This compares to September of last year, when our fleet was 26% of total sales, commercial was 13% of total sales, government

was 5%, and the [indiscernible] was 8%. When we take a look at year-to-date, year-to-date, our fleet as a percentage of total sales

was 30%, commercial was 13% of total sales, 5% was for government and rental was 12%. When we look at -- compared at the

September year-to-date last year, 31% was the percent of our total sales for fleet, 14% was for commercial, 5% was for

government and 12% was for rental.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Some other news from the sales call:

 

 

 

 

With inventories improving, Fusion sales reported a 62% increase over September of last year with 19,972 sold. This represents Fusion's best ever September sales performance. Calendar year-to-date Fusion retail sales increased in San Francisco by 78% and a little further south, 83% in Los Angeles. Miami increased by 58% continuing our sweep in the coastal regions. The majority of our competitive conquest in these regions are coming directly from the Japanese competition. We will soon be shipping Fusion's from our flat rock assembly plant which will position us even better as we move into October and the traditionally strong end of year sales period.

F series trucks continue to roll with 60,456 sold in September, an increase of 10% versus year ago levels. We have now had five consecutive months of sales over the 60,000 F series vehicle mark. The last time we accomplished a sustained level above 60,000 for five consecutive months was made through September in 2006, seven years ago. The month also represented our 26th straight month of F series sales gains year over year.

Turning to Lincoln MKZ, our sales totaled 2,874 representing a 12% increase compared to last year. This represents our best ever September performance for MKZ even with the September Labor Day weekend counted in August.

We have been benchmarking MKZ sales performance since April of this year, the point of which MKZ had an appropriate supply on dealer lots. Since this time, MKZ sales have been up 22% over the same period a year ago. Sales of MKZ Hybrid, are also taking hold representing almost two thirds of all MKZs sold in California

 

.

Edited by jpd80, 02 October 2013 - 02:38 AM.

  • aneekr likes this

#36 OFFLINE   jpd80

jpd80

    Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,114 posts
  • Joined 02-June 04
  • Region:Decline
  • Location:My Happy Place
  • Current Vehicle:Falcon 302 V8

Posted 02 October 2013 - 05:02 AM

In the 12-month period beginning last September, Ford is likely to have sold about 85,000 hybrids and electric vehicles

compared to about 22,000 during the 12 months previous to that. (Although automakers reported September U.S. sales

Tuesday, Ford’s numbers on hybrid and electric vehicle sales aren’t released until Thursday.

 

“It’s like going from last in the league to the second-best selling hybrid brand in the country in one year,” said Erich Merkle,

Ford’s U.S. sales analyst, in a telephone interview.

 

From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitne...2#ixzz2gYcIgTim


Edited by jpd80, 02 October 2013 - 05:04 AM.


#37 OFFLINE   Fgts

Fgts

    Blue Oval Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPip
  • 1,514 posts
  • Joined 02-March 10

Posted 02 October 2013 - 06:20 AM

<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote'data-author="Moosetang" data-cid="874065" data-time="1380677234"><p>
How much did CTS, the new CTS, and the ATS cost to develop and put into production? How much the MKZ? </p></blockquote>

Seeing the ATS/CTS is GMs rwd small/mid-size program it not going to be cheap especially if the cars have to be world class or get killed in reviews and sales. Since the MKZ is a Lacrosse competitor how much the CD4 cost vs Epll?.

#38 OFFLINE   silvrsvt

silvrsvt

    Bite my Shiny metal ass!

  • Moderator
  • 17,987 posts
  • Joined 03-October 02
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • Location:New Jersey
  • Current Vehicle:2017 Escape SE AWD/2013 Taurus SHO

Posted 02 October 2013 - 07:31 AM

Seeing the ATS/CTS is GMs rwd small/mid-size program it not going to be cheap especially if the cars have to be world class or get killed in reviews and sales. Since the MKZ is a Lacrosse competitor how much the CD4 cost vs Epll?.

 

 

And thank you for pointing out the idiotic nature of GM...lets spread out our money on multiple overlapping programs that cut into our profit margins. It makes no sense to spend money on a boutique brand or sales numbers if you can't support them long term with updates. Then you have to figure that GM will start "diluting" the ATS/CTS platform by coming out with a Buick and Chevy based off it...with the same crappy sales numbers...

 

Spending money on Caddy wouldn't be so bad if they had their shit together with other products...but they don't. You bring up the EpII program, the Malibu even with an emergency refresh is still a turd, where as the Fusion is more or less setting the standard for styling and performance in the CD market now. 


"Hell, there are no rules here-- we're trying to accomplish something."
Thomas A. Edison


Ford Products owned though the years:
1986 Escort GT Race Red
1998 Mustang GT Dark Green Satin
2002 SVT Focus Satin Silver
2006 Mustang GT Tungsten Grey

2010 Escape XLT AWD Sport Blue
2013 Taurus SHO Ruby Red

2017 Escape SE AWD Platinum White

Future Fords:
2021 Bronco

20xx Mustang GT350 or the like

 

199923.png
 
photo-thumb-15254.jpg


#39 OFFLINE   aneekr

aneekr

    Plain Old Dood

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,830 posts
  • Joined 10-January 07
  • Region:U.S. Great Lakes
  • Location:Indianapolis
  • Current Vehicle:none

Posted 02 October 2013 - 08:46 AM

jpd80 - thanks for sharing some of Mr. Merkle's discussion points during yesterday's U.S. sales conference call. I am delighted to hear about Ford's continued leadership in the fleet market with a balanced mix across all three segments (commercial, government, and rental).


Ford Motor Company investor since 2000. Cancer survivor since 2014!


#40 OFFLINE   Project-Fairmont

Project-Fairmont

    Member

  • Blue Oval Member
  • Pip
  • 306 posts
  • Joined 08-November 00
  • Location:Green Bay WI USA

Posted 02 October 2013 - 09:10 AM

And thank you for pointing out the idiotic nature of GM...lets spread out our money on multiple overlapping programs that cut into our profit margins. It makes no sense to spend money on a boutique brand or sales numbers if you can't support them long term with updates. Then you have to figure that GM will start "diluting" the ATS/CTS platform by coming out with a Buick and Chevy based off it...with the same crappy sales numbers...

 

Spending money on Caddy wouldn't be so bad if they had their shit together with other products...but they don't. You bring up the EpII program, the Malibu even with an emergency refresh is still a turd, where as the Fusion is more or less setting the standard for styling and performance in the CD market now. 

Give GM credit for making Cadillac as good as they can.  Caddy has always been its leader in content that passed down to Chevy after a time.  Ford is simply capatilizing on the incredible investment put in Jag, LR, AM and Volvo.  One could argue that Lincoln should have been elevated at the time, however it is what it is.  Question; where will Ford get its future innovation now that it no longer has those high-end Euro R&D labs?


Edited by Project-Fairmont, 02 October 2013 - 09:11 AM.

Current Stable

'15 Mustang EB

'12 BMW 135

'04 SVT Lightning 

'82 Mustang GT 
'65 FFR Daytona Coupe









Custom Search


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Privacy Policy Terms of Service ·