Mackintire Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 http://www.change.org/petitions/view/bring_the_t6_ford_ranger_to_the_us We have to let Ford know how we feel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrin Kay Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 http://www.change.org/petitions/view/bring_the_t6_ford_ranger_to_the_us We have to let Ford know how we feel. I am a Ford fan and I do agree Ford needs to keep a competitive small pick up truck. I agree that the F-150 is just way too big for my needs. If Ford were truly interested in moving Ranger customers to the F-150, they would offer the regular cab/short box version of it with the new V-6 for 2011. At this time, it is not clear to me if that configuration is even an option for the 2011 F-150. However, I actually like the current Ranger. IMO all Ford needs to do is refresh the interior and add more efficient engines and transmission choices while keeping it conforming to safety laws. That alone could give it a few more years until a better choice is ready. I am not at all interested in buying an imported Ford truck. Manufacture it here or I'll be putting down my money on the new Jeep pick up truck allegedly given the green light. IF Jeep builds that truck and Ford doesn't answer, there will be a loud sucking sound created by loyal Ranger customers and businesses alike going to the new Jeep pick up truck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonas1022 Posted November 16, 2010 Share Posted November 16, 2010 (edited) That sounds mighty brave, but the fact is Jeep has yet to produce an inexpensive anything worth having. Patriot? Compass? Merely relabled Dodge/Plymouth platforms. Plymouth is dead, Dodge isn't far behind. Jeeps are traditionally expensive to buy, and maintain. I doubt that they will have an inexpensive "small" pickup without a less expensive version over at the (Dodge) Ram store. And refresh my memory. Just where is that small Dodge pickup that they used to produce and sell? Out of production, that's where. Edited November 16, 2010 by jonas1022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTwannabe Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 Is Mexico still getting/building the T6 Ranger? Seems like a no-brainer to slap an F-100 badge on the new Ranger, limit the engines to 4 and 5 cylinders, and sell it on Ford lots. So what if it's 90% the size of an F-150? Who cares? You're just utilizing excess Mexican plant production capacity when it's available. Price them similar to the Tacoma/Frontier (loaded 4WD quad cab under 30k) and they will fly off the lots! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mackintire Posted February 27, 2011 Author Share Posted February 27, 2011 Is Mexico still getting/building the T6 Ranger? Seems like a no-brainer to slap an F-100 badge on the new Ranger, limit the engines to 4 and 5 cylinders, and sell it on Ford lots. So what if it's 90% the size of an F-150? Who cares? You're just utilizing excess Mexican plant production capacity when it's available. Price them similar to the Tacoma/Frontier (loaded 4WD quad cab under 30k) and they will fly off the lots! Mexico....no. Brazil....Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genemusgrave Posted November 15, 2011 Share Posted November 15, 2011 Mexico....no. Brazil....Yes. a Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tenracing Posted December 31, 2011 Share Posted December 31, 2011 I am a Ford fan and I do agree Ford needs to keep a competitive small pick up truck. I agree that the F-150 is just way too big for my needs. If Ford were truly interested in moving Ranger customers to the F-150, they would offer the regular cab/short box version of it with the new V-6 for 2011. At this time, it is not clear to me if that configuration is even an option for the 2011 F-150. However, I actually like the current Ranger. IMO all Ford needs to do is refresh the interior and add more efficient engines and transmission choices while keeping it conforming to safety laws. That alone could give it a few more years until a better choice is ready. I am not at all interested in buying an imported Ford truck. Manufacture it here or I'll be putting down my money on the new Jeep pick up truck allegedly given the green light. IF Jeep builds that truck and Ford doesn't answer, there will be a loud sucking sound created by loyal Ranger customers and businesses alike going to the new Jeep pick up truck. My thought was take the Ranger, give it a freshen up styling outside and in, then put an Eco-Boost motor in it... Increased mileage = better sales for small trucks IMHO, if the F150 ecoboost gets as good if not better it takes away one fairly large benifit of having a smaller truck... Besides, Ranger with EcoBoost 2.0l in a short box regular cab with a 6 speed and real posi rear end would be a freakin HOOT to drive! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mechanic Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 My thought was take the Ranger, give it a freshen up styling outside and in, then put an Eco-Boost motor in it... Increased mileage = better sales for small trucks IMHO, if the F150 ecoboost gets as good if not better it takes away one fairly large benifit of having a smaller truck... Besides, Ranger with EcoBoost 2.0l in a short box regular cab with a 6 speed and real posi rear end would be a freakin HOOT to drive! I have a pic I took yesterday of a Mazda /ranger near Romeo, mi. Mazda rear and three bar blueoval front. I can't get it to post though...arrgh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTwannabe Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 (edited) I have a pic I took yesterday of a Mazda /ranger near Romeo, mi. Mazda rear and three bar blueoval front. I can't get it to post though...arrgh Upload to Google Docs and share the link. Edited February 5, 2012 by GTwannabe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len_A Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 My wife & I saw a T-6 global Ranger yesterday, here in Livonia, MI, with manufacturers plates on it. It's huge. Way bigger than the Ranger that just went out of production here. Looked to be the size of the a Dodge Dakota. I wonder who would buy that over an F-150, except for the garagability issue. If the next gen F-150 goes back to being a bit more garagable, the T-6 Ranger might be viewed as redundant here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTwannabe Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 My wife & I saw a T-6 global Ranger yesterday, here in Livonia, MI, with manufacturers plates on it. It's huge. Way bigger than the Ranger that just went out of production here. Looked to be the size of the a Dodge Dakota. I wonder who would buy that over an F-150, except for the garagability issue. If the next gen F-150 goes back to being a bit more garagable, the T-6 Ranger might be viewed as redundant here. Yes, it's bigger than the US Ranger, but I wouldn't call it "huge." T6 is exactly the same width as a Nissan Frontier (72.8"). It's 5.5" longer than the short wheelbase Frontier. It's 8" shorter than the long wheelbase Frontier/Dodge Dakota. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mackintire Posted February 25, 2012 Author Share Posted February 25, 2012 My wife & I saw a T-6 global Ranger yesterday, here in Livonia, MI, with manufacturers plates on it. It's huge. Way bigger than the Ranger that just went out of production here. Looked to be the size of the a Dodge Dakota. I wonder who would buy that over an F-150, except for the garagability issue. If the next gen F-150 goes back to being a bit more garagable, the T-6 Ranger might be viewed as redundant here. I would have figured the +4-5 MPG better fuel economy or the fact that it has a higher weight bedload capability than the F150 might be something US buyers may be interested in. Although the pricing is the biggest sticking point. That T6 is not cheap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theoldwizard Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 My wife & I saw a T-6 global Ranger yesterday, here in Livonia, MI, with manufacturers plates on it. It's huge. Way bigger than the Ranger that just went out of production here. That's good ! My 6'4" SIL barely fit in the old Ranger and after and hour of so of driving he needed chiropractic service ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noah Harbinger Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 (edited) I would have figured the +4-5 MPG better fuel economy... Has that been subjected to US emissions standards and EPA testing? Or is it a straight conversion from some overseas test? Edited February 25, 2012 by Noah Harbinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noah Harbinger Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 That's good ! My 6'4" SIL barely fit in the old Ranger and after and hour of so of driving he needed chiropractic service ! First thing I thought was 'Sister-in-law' and I was thinking "Dang, man, better treat your wife right!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTwannabe Posted February 28, 2012 Share Posted February 28, 2012 (edited) My wife & I saw a T-6 global Ranger yesterday, here in Livonia, MI, with manufacturers plates on it. It's huge. Way bigger than the Ranger that just went out of production here. Looked to be the size of the a Dodge Dakota. I wonder who would buy that over an F-150, except for the garagability issue. If the next gen F-150 goes back to being a bit more garagable, the T-6 Ranger might be viewed as redundant here. Shrinking to the size of the 97 model would be a good start. I stopped by the Ford dealership today after looking at Frontiers (T6-width, -5.5" length). Walked up to a 4x4 F-150 and tried reaching into the bed. I'm 6' tall and the top of the bedrail was wedged into my armpit. I'd expect that from a Super Duty, but very inconvenient for a daily driver. Edited March 1, 2012 by GTwannabe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheri/ck Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Shrinking to the size of the 97 model would be a good start. I stopped by the Ford dealership today after looking at Frontiers (T6-width, +5.5" length). Walked up to a 4x4 F-150 and tried reaching into the bed. I'm 6' tall and the top of the bedrail was wedged into my armpit. I'd expect that from a Super Duty, but very inconvenient for a daily driver. Sure do hope Ford comes up with something and sooner than later. The F-150 is just too big and could not agree more about trying to reach over the side rails. Put a tool box on and most anyone would need to have a step stool or a ladder to access it. Guess the latest side steps on the vehicle are supposed to help here, but you still need a stool just to check the oil. At some point bigger is not better in America - I hope. For us, a Dakota sized vehicle would be close to right. It just needs to feel like a good value relative to MPG improvements, handling improvements, AWD option? Some of us would be willing to pay for a new truck that is both functional, frugal, fun to drive, easy to park, fits in a garage - etc., etc. Got to be a market and the first one to it will likely win over some customers. Hope it isn't the new Colorado and I'll keep an eye on it. It may very well be to GM what the T-6 could have been for Ford. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTwannabe Posted March 1, 2012 Share Posted March 1, 2012 I bought my first non-FoMoCo vehicle yesterday: It's a PRO-4X (Nissan's FX4 equivalent) with the 6-speed manual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheri/ck Posted March 1, 2012 Share Posted March 1, 2012 I bought my first non-FoMoCo vehicle yesterday: It's a PRO-4X (Nissan's FX4 equivalent) with the 6-speed manual. Congratulations on what should be a very nice new truck. Just the package and trim level I would buy. Will be curious as to gas mileage as it breaks in. Considering that we do well (19 mpg average, mixed driving) with our 4.0 Ranger 4X4, 5-speed manual - I am thinking this package should be a good 15% better. And for sure better all highway. The other plus is the Frontier is holding its resale value surprisingly well. Enjoy and keep us posted. None of us wanting a mid-sized truck can wait on Ford forever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTwannabe Posted March 1, 2012 Share Posted March 1, 2012 Congratulations on what should be a very nice new truck. Just the package and trim level I would buy. Will be curious as to gas mileage as it breaks in. Considering that we do well (19 mpg average, mixed driving) with our 4.0 Ranger 4X4, 5-speed manual - I am thinking this package should be a good 15% better. And for sure better all highway. The other plus is the Frontier is holding its resale value surprisingly well. Enjoy and keep us posted. None of us wanting a mid-sized truck can wait on Ford forever. The Frontier's MPG estimates are the same as the "revised" numbers for my B3000 (15 city, 20 highway). The Mazda averages 21 and I can get 23 with mostly highway driving. Would have preferred a T6 with EB 2.0 or diesel for the extra MPG and another few inches of rear legroom. But I am very happy with the Nissan so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mackintire Posted March 5, 2012 Author Share Posted March 5, 2012 The Frontier's MPG estimates are the same as the "revised" numbers for my B3000 (15 city, 20 highway). The Mazda averages 21 and I can get 23 with mostly highway driving. Would have preferred a T6 with EB 2.0 or diesel for the extra MPG and another few inches of rear legroom. But I am very happy with the Nissan so far. That's funny because I was pricing one today. A 2012 quad-cab LE, Auto, 4x4 with the sport package. Either way, I'll be buying something next spring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mechanic Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 finally got my pics to upload! this was taken near romeo michigan. had ford style chrome grill. mazda tail lights. seemed just a little smaller than my 03 f150. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTwannabe Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 finally got my pics to upload! this was taken near romeo michigan. had ford style chrome grill. mazda tail lights. seemed just a little smaller than my 03 f150. Can't see the grille, but it definitely looks like a Mazda BT-50. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theoldwizard Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 Cruise the Visitor parking lots in front of Building 2 off of Rotunda. I have seen T6's and Transits parked out there during the work day for month ! Most of the Transits have a bulge on the hood, a diesel fluid fill door and a cobbled up dash for an automatic gear shift ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipround Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 I am very disappointed they discontinued the Ranger. It was one of the last compact pickups for sale ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.