|
|
|
Advertise on BlueOvalNews. Click here to contact us.
An overview of Panther's demise Can Ford come out of this on top?
#1
Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:48 AM
#2
Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:54 AM
Can we please put an end to these whinefests about the Panther already?
#3
Posted 02 July 2010 - 12:03 PM
NickF1011, on 02 July 2010 - 12:54 PM, said:
Can we please put an end to these whinefests about the Panther already?
If Ford had an announced RWD replacement for the Panther platform, I don't think you would see all the whining. But alas, Ford has nothing. Generations have been brought up on RWD platforms. I myself prefer FWD, but there is a place other than Mustang for RWD. I only hope the next generation RWD Mustang is flexible enough to be widened and lengthened to buile a new Lincoln sports sedan and a new Thunderbird. In my mind and in many others I suspect, Ford will not be fully back until they have a Lincoln RWD sports sedan and coupe plus a RWD Thunderbird. With AWD and traction control, RWD in some ways is better than FWD. If Ford doesn't offer more RWD vehicles, then Ford is going to be left out in the cold in future. This makes the end of Panther even sadder.
#4
Posted 02 July 2010 - 12:04 PM
#5
Posted 02 July 2010 - 12:09 PM
FordBuyer, on 02 July 2010 - 01:03 PM, said:
The only people whining are people who bought panthers used....from old Taxis and PD fleets :rolleyes:
Ford needs to cater to a 2nd hand market...um ok!
#6
Posted 02 July 2010 - 12:17 PM
#7
Posted 02 July 2010 - 03:50 PM
This post has been edited by jpd80: 02 July 2010 - 03:51 PM
#8
Posted 02 July 2010 - 10:56 PM
Joe771476, on 02 July 2010 - 05:48 PM, said:
Another comment on RWD- When the LS came out, it got rave reviews. What did Ford do? Ignore it. An opportunity to build on something and they blew it. This pattern gets old after a while.
#9
Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:20 PM
1400 people will lose their jobs including myself.
#10
Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:22 PM
#11
Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:23 PM
#12
Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:40 PM
Bob Rosadini, on 03 July 2010 - 01:56 PM, said:
Another comment on RWD- When the LS came out, it got rave reviews. What did Ford do? Ignore it. An opportunity to build on something and they blew it. This pattern gets old after a while.
Perhaps DEW platform and LS was a money pit that lost large amounts of money.....
#13
Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:43 PM
#14
Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:45 PM
Let's be honest - Ford blew it with this platform, and is replacing it with an inferior product because they can build a large sedan that can be cobbed off of a global platform on the cheap.
Sure, the new federal CAFE requirements are part of it, but Ford gave up on this platform over a decade ago. When the 2003 major up was cancelled, and just a few chassis improvements were done, the writing was on the wall.
Even though I could pay cash for a new car, my wife and I are keeping what we have and driving them as long as possible. Long term durability and reliability is main attributes I look for, which doesn't appear promising with the upcoming vehicles and all the new technology.
As Toyota found out with drive by wire, which is why I keep my old school Corolla instead of buying a new one.
#15
Posted 03 July 2010 - 01:17 AM
William Blake
#16
Posted 03 July 2010 - 06:14 AM
silvrsvt, on 02 July 2010 - 01:09 PM, said:
Ford needs to cater to a 2nd hand market...um ok!
Mercury Grand Marquis and Lincoln Town Cars are not purchased new for police and taxi fleets...try again.
#17
Posted 03 July 2010 - 06:16 AM
taxman100, on 03 July 2010 - 12:45 AM, said:
Let's be honest - Ford blew it with this platform, and is replacing it with an inferior product because they can build a large sedan that can be cobbed off of a global platform on the cheap.
We have a winner!
#18
Posted 03 July 2010 - 06:33 AM
taxman100, on 03 July 2010 - 12:45 AM, said:
Sure, the new federal CAFE requirements are part of it, but Ford gave up on this platform over a decade ago. When the 2003 major up was cancelled, and just a few chassis improvements were done, the writing was on the wall.
As you already noted, "CAFE requirements are part of it," and you're missing that it's not just CAFE -- the Panther's fuel efficiency issues meant that CAFE or no CAFE, it was going to have to be on the way out, no matter what. In that respect, the Taurus is anything but an "inferior product." Its strengths are not what you consider important, perhaps; that doesn't make it an inferior product.
And the issues with the Panther's fuel efficiency meant that it could not easily be properly updated with the comfort/safety/technology advances that the Taurus has. As it stands already, the Grand Marquis weighs 4,117 pounds without those updates that people claim that it could have and should have gotten. The Taurus is substantially more fuel efficient at a comparable weight (4,015 pounds). Adding the equipment that would have been necessary to make the Panther market-competitive would have made its fuel efficiency issues just that much more glaring.
This post has been edited by nelsonlu: 03 July 2010 - 06:41 AM
#19
Posted 03 July 2010 - 08:33 AM
No...
Ford, simply can't bounce back from the demise of the panther.
Laugh all you will about the crude limo conversions,the poor people who want a rwd
large car and the apparent non profitable police market.
What do we have in Australia now that Ford pulled the plug on the LWB Fairlane/LTD?
Chrysler 300c
Holden Statesman/Caprice....oh,hang on...your next cop cruiser!
Ford in Australia CREATED the LWB segment,and like the Crown Vic/Marquis
let the once proud nameplate suffer in neglect with a new grill here and there and a re skin
with left over Falcon funds and wondered where the buyers went.
I feel for those who miss the panther,and obviously it's not just the US who suffer the same Ford mentality
when it comes to large RWD sedans.
As said before, I will not buy a NEW Ford product again,
until I can go into my local dearlership and buy a RWD Fairlane/lLTD
And by the looks of it, I won't be in a Ford dealership again.
#20
Posted 03 July 2010 - 09:40 AM
nelsonlu, on 03 July 2010 - 08:33 AM, said:
And the issues with the Panther's fuel efficiency meant that it could not easily be properly updated with the comfort/safety/technology advances that the Taurus has. As it stands already, the Grand Marquis weighs 4,117 pounds without those updates that people claim that it could have and should have gotten. The Taurus is substantially more fuel efficient at a comparable weight (4,015 pounds). Adding the equipment that would have been necessary to make the Panther market-competitive would have made its fuel efficiency issues just that much more glaring.
They could have put a 3.5L / 3.7L in her and the weight would have dropped, And MPG would have gone up. I am just pointing out that weight is not an issue.
Would be nice to see a 3.5L EB Marauder before its all over.


Help


Back to top
MultiQuote








