|
|
|
Advertise on BlueOvalNews. Click here to contact us.
Ford Thunderbird turns 55
#1
Posted 27 June 2010 - 06:12 AM
more on http://www.auto-powe...nniversary.html
#2
Posted 27 June 2010 - 07:20 AM
Its absolute sin that T-Bird is not Fords global MX-5 purpose built global convertible car.
Instantly recognizable universally loved worldwide an absolute classic sorely missed no doubt Stateside.
This post has been edited by Ford Jellymoulds: 27 June 2010 - 07:20 AM
#3
Posted 27 June 2010 - 12:11 PM
Ford Jellymoulds, on 27 June 2010 - 08:20 AM, said:
Its absolute sin that T-Bird is not Fords global MX-5 purpose built global convertible car.
Instantly recognizable universally loved worldwide an absolute classic sorely missed no doubt Stateside.
Still hoping to buy a 2-seater roadster ThunderBird on-par with the MB SLK.
(And an SVT model on-par with Corvette)
#4
Posted 29 June 2010 - 12:12 AM
#5
Posted 30 June 2010 - 08:14 AM
When you don't carry the nameplate for over 5 years with no replacement even announced, the nameplate is dead. The original run was 1955-1997 (43 model years) and then the aborted 2002-2005 (4 model years) so at best the T-Bird run was 47 years. Maybe someone's particular T-Bird is turning 55, but until we get a new vehicle bearing the Thunderbird name, the T-Bird doesn't turn 55 any more than DeSoto turns 81.
#6
Posted 03 July 2010 - 08:39 AM
As the years go by...people will now respect the 80-82 Birds
#7
Posted 03 July 2010 - 05:11 PM
T'Cal, on 29 June 2010 - 03:12 PM, said:
Believe it or not there was a plan to do that but the Mustang was given a 3-link rear end for cost saving and dashed all hopes of a high series variant. A two door Falcon coupe proposal was considered but ruled out as too expensive.
This post has been edited by jpd80: 03 July 2010 - 05:12 PM
#8
Posted 04 July 2010 - 05:09 AM
#9
Posted 12 July 2010 - 06:18 PM
jpd80, on 03 July 2010 - 06:11 PM, said:
Would it be that expensive to manufacture an IRS for this T-Bird? This car could demand a premium price, which would include developing the unique rear suspension. In addition, Ford could use the IRS on special Mustangs such as an SVT/SVO model that sports the Ecoboost V6, which would spread out the costs even more.
#10
Posted 13 July 2010 - 01:13 PM
T'Cal, on 12 July 2010 - 07:18 PM, said:
I read somewhere (Jalopnik?) that the next gen Mustang will have IRS, so maybe a shared platform with ThunderBird, and a Lincoln MK10, is actually possible.
#11
Posted 13 July 2010 - 02:43 PM
#12
Posted 14 July 2010 - 12:54 PM
#13
Posted 19 July 2010 - 01:32 PM


Help

Back to top
MultiQuote








