Blue Oval Forums: Ford Thunderbird turns 55 - Blue Oval Forums

Jump to content

Custom Search


Advertise on BlueOvalNews. Click here to contact us.


Close Open
Close Open

Automotive Open Topic

Please post all Automotive "Off Topic" discussions here.
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Ford Thunderbird turns 55

#1 User is offline   mamboo 

  • New BON Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 17
  • Joined: 20-May 10

Posted 27 June 2010 - 06:12 AM

Known for its classic design cues and the character of a true American sports car, the Ford Thunderbird is celebrating its 55th anniversary this year, and owners from across the country are coming together to celebrate the classic car
more on http://www.auto-powe...nniversary.html
0

#2 User is offline   Ford Jellymoulds 

  • Ford only FUN RWD new car buyer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 6,750
  • Joined: 07-December 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Not in a FOE showroon looking at FUN RWD cars
  • Interests:Buying new a new Ford FUN RWD car
    List of Ford of Europe FUN RWD cars to buy
    (Fun is banned in Europe)

Posted 27 June 2010 - 07:20 AM

Happy 55th Birthday Thunderbird

Its absolute sin that T-Bird is not Fords global MX-5 purpose built global convertible car.

Instantly recognizable universally loved worldwide an absolute classic sorely missed no doubt Stateside.


This post has been edited by Ford Jellymoulds: 27 June 2010 - 07:20 AM

0

#3 User is offline   joihan777 

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 1,127
  • Joined: 08-April 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Elk Grove, CA

Posted 27 June 2010 - 12:11 PM

View PostFord Jellymoulds, on 27 June 2010 - 08:20 AM, said:

Happy 55th Birthday Thunderbird

Its absolute sin that T-Bird is not Fords global MX-5 purpose built global convertible car.

Instantly recognizable universally loved worldwide an absolute classic sorely missed no doubt Stateside.


Still hoping to buy a 2-seater roadster ThunderBird on-par with the MB SLK.

(And an SVT model on-par with Corvette)
0

#4 User is offline   T'Cal 

  • New BON Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 212
  • Joined: 11-January 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago

Posted 29 June 2010 - 12:12 AM

Ford should've built a new T-bird off of the Mustang platform, especially the latest model that's getting all the good ink. I would love to see another two-seater powered by the new 3.7 and EB3.5 V6s.
0

#5 User is offline   OAC_Sparky 

  • Sarcastic Bastard
  • PipPip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 2,323
  • Joined: 30-August 01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • Interests:I make things go "BOOM!!"

Posted 30 June 2010 - 08:14 AM

My Dad died about 8 years ago. He was 62. He isn't turning 70. He died at 62. I would even go out on a limb and say "This year, he would have turned 70".

When you don't carry the nameplate for over 5 years with no replacement even announced, the nameplate is dead. The original run was 1955-1997 (43 model years) and then the aborted 2002-2005 (4 model years) so at best the T-Bird run was 47 years. Maybe someone's particular T-Bird is turning 55, but until we get a new vehicle bearing the Thunderbird name, the T-Bird doesn't turn 55 any more than DeSoto turns 81.
1

#6 User is offline   MRZJ 

  • New BON Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 15
  • Joined: 17-February 08

Posted 03 July 2010 - 08:39 AM

Hopefully,

As the years go by...people will now respect the 80-82 Birds
0

#7 User is offline   jpd80 

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 9,450
  • Joined: 02-June 04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 July 2010 - 05:11 PM

View PostT'Cal, on 29 June 2010 - 03:12 PM, said:

Ford should've built a new T-bird off of the Mustang platform, especially the latest model that's getting all the good ink. I would love to see another two-seater powered by the new 3.7 and EB3.5 V6s.

Believe it or not there was a plan to do that but the Mustang was given a 3-link rear end for cost saving and dashed all hopes of a high series variant. A two door Falcon coupe proposal was considered but ruled out as too expensive.

This post has been edited by jpd80: 03 July 2010 - 05:12 PM

0

#8 User is offline   twintornados 

  • Been here longer than the date shown...but, hey..at least I am
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 2,611
  • Joined: 16-February 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NY

Posted 04 July 2010 - 05:09 AM

View PostMRZJ, on 03 July 2010 - 09:39 AM, said:

Hopefully,

As the years go by...people will now respect the 80-82 Birds

:hysterical:
0

#9 User is offline   T'Cal 

  • New BON Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 212
  • Joined: 11-January 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago

Posted 12 July 2010 - 06:18 PM

View Postjpd80, on 03 July 2010 - 06:11 PM, said:

Believe it or not there was a plan to do that but the Mustang was given a 3-link rear end for cost saving and dashed all hopes of a high series variant. A two door Falcon coupe proposal was considered but ruled out as too expensive.


Would it be that expensive to manufacture an IRS for this T-Bird? This car could demand a premium price, which would include developing the unique rear suspension. In addition, Ford could use the IRS on special Mustangs such as an SVT/SVO model that sports the Ecoboost V6, which would spread out the costs even more.
0

#10 User is offline   joihan777 

  • Blue Oval Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 1,127
  • Joined: 08-April 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Elk Grove, CA

Posted 13 July 2010 - 01:13 PM

View PostT'Cal, on 12 July 2010 - 07:18 PM, said:

Would it be that expensive to manufacture an IRS for this T-Bird? This car could demand a premium price, which would include developing the unique rear suspension. In addition, Ford could use the IRS on special Mustangs such as an SVT/SVO model that sports the Ecoboost V6, which would spread out the costs even more.


I read somewhere (Jalopnik?) that the next gen Mustang will have IRS, so maybe a shared platform with ThunderBird, and a Lincoln MK10, is actually possible.
0

#11 User is offline   twintornados 

  • Been here longer than the date shown...but, hey..at least I am
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 2,611
  • Joined: 16-February 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NY

Posted 13 July 2010 - 02:43 PM

View Postjoihan777, on 13 July 2010 - 02:13 PM, said:

I read somewhere (Jalopnik?) that the next gen Mustang will have IRS, so maybe a shared platform with ThunderBird, and a Lincoln MK10, is actually possible.

It would be a MK 9, since the last one was a MK 8....
0

#12 User is offline   T'Cal 

  • New BON Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 212
  • Joined: 11-January 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago

Posted 14 July 2010 - 12:54 PM

View Posttwintornados, on 13 July 2010 - 03:43 PM, said:

It would be a MK 9, since the last one was a MK 8....

Maybe Lincoln will get rid of the goofy MK* designation by then and call it the Mark 9.
0

#13 User is offline   Ford Jellymoulds 

  • Ford only FUN RWD new car buyer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 6,750
  • Joined: 07-December 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Not in a FOE showroon looking at FUN RWD cars
  • Interests:Buying new a new Ford FUN RWD car
    List of Ford of Europe FUN RWD cars to buy
    (Fun is banned in Europe)

Posted 19 July 2010 - 01:32 PM

View Postjoihan777, on 27 June 2010 - 06:11 PM, said:

Still hoping to buy a 2-seater roadster ThunderBird on-par with the MB SLK.

(And an SVT model on-par with Corvette)



Lucky bugger wish l could, the T-Birds a million times better than a MB full of Crossfire bits.


0

#14 User is offline   J-150 

  • Newbie
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Blue Oval Members
  • Posts: 4,819
  • Joined: 13-May 05
  • Location:NYC, Chicago, T.O, Montreal

Posted 22 July 2010 - 03:05 PM

in related news, the Granada turns 35
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic