
|
|
Welcome to Blue Oval Forums

- Start new topics and reply to others
- Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
- Get your own profile page and make new friends
- Send personal messages to other members
- Create a photo album and post images
- Use the Shout feature and more. . .

What ever happened to the two speed rear end?
#1
OFFLINE
Posted 02 January 2008 - 10:54 PM
http://www.hemmings...._feature21.html
'64 1/2 Mustang Convertible - 289 5 speed restomod
'66 T-Bird Convertible - restored
'06 Explorer Eddie Bauer - Dark Cherry Metallic and Pueblo Gold (My 5th EB Explorer)
I Disagree With You...But I'm Pretty Sure You're Not Hitler.
- Jon Stewart
PITTSBURGH CITY OF CHAMPIONS-PITTSBURGH STEELERS - SUPER BOWL IX, X, XII, XIV, XL, XLIII CHAMPIONS--PITTSBURGH PENGUINS - 1991, 1992, 2009 & 2016 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS and the PITTSBURGH PIRATES WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS 1909, 1960, 1971 & 1979 and now - After 20 consecutive losing seasons: a contender. (I hope)
Pittsburgh Vintage Grand Prix July 7-16, 2017 www.pvgp.org
Lose this advertisement by becoming a member. Click here to create a free account.
#2
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 12:11 AM
Because then they would have something the competition doesn't...and we can't have that.In the article on the increase in mileage on the Super Duty, it was mentioned that the drawback in using higher gear ratios was a decrease in towing performance. That got me thinking of the Columbia two speed rear that Ford used in the 1930s. Why not resurrect this old idea and have the best of both worlds. Lower gears to be used for towing and higher gears for improved mileage the rest of the time.
http://www.hemmings...._feature21.html

So Long!
#3
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 12:13 AM
In the article on the increase in mileage on the Super Duty, it was mentioned that the drawback in using higher gear ratios was a decrease in towing performance. That got me thinking of the Columbia two speed rear that Ford used in the 1930s. Why not resurrect this old idea and have the best of both worlds. Lower gears to be used for towing and higher gears for improved mileage the rest of the time.
http://www.hemmings...._feature21.html
Interesting thought. I'm not familiar with the unit Ford used in the 30's, but I am familiar with the one GM used in it's trucks in the 60's. We had an old '64 GMC 2-ton farm truck which had a 2-speed rear axle. It was kind of fun to drive as a kid...rowing through all those gears just for fun. Now to be honest, I could shift through all 4 gears and stay in low range (or high range for that matter), w/o going through all of them (i.e. 1 low, 1 high, 2 low, 2 high, etc...). On only a couple of occasions that I can remember did I have such a heavy load that 4 high was too tall and needed to go to 4 low on the highway. But that may be where one potential issue is. Many people may not like having to shift alot to find the right gear for what they are doing. But at the same time, today's technology would surely be able to simplify the process. It ought to be considered as an option for those who want it. Any ideas as to how much it might cost to implement?
#4
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 02:09 AM
#5
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 02:17 AM
1969 Mercury Cougar - 1994 Mustang GT - 2009 Ford Ranger Sport
Past Rides -
1967 Mercury Cougar - 1968 Ford Galaxie Fastback - 1969 Mercury Cougar XR7 - 1972 Ford LTD CS - 1972 Lincoln MkIV - 2004 Ford Ranger XLT -


#6
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 08:04 AM
"Hell, there are no rules here-- we're trying to accomplish something."
Thomas A. Edison
Ford Products owned though the years:
1986 Escort GT Race Red
1998 Mustang GT Dark Green Satin
2002 SVT Focus Satin Silver
2006 Mustang GT Tungsten Grey
2010 Escape XLT AWD Sport Blue
2013 Taurus SHO Ruby Red
2017 Escape SE AWD Platinum White
Future Fords:
2021 Bronco
20xx Mustang GT350 or the like
#7
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 08:08 AM
the problem isn't the equipment, I doubt half the Neanderthals out there could properly use them. you need to let off the throttle when shifting, and wait for it to be fully engaged before applying power again.
a fool-proof overdrive is a safer way to reduce warranty claims.
#8
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 08:16 AM
#9
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 08:48 AM
Perhaps when Ford makes a Z06 I'll be back
#10
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 08:55 AM
GEAR VENDORS UNDER/OVERDRIVE™
Art
Current/Recent Fords:
2001 Ford Mustang GT Convertible 4.6L V8 (Purchased New 10/01, my toy, to be sold soon...)
2001 Ford F150 Lariat SuperCrew 4x4 5.4L V8 (Purchased New 06/00 - Sold 06/01/11)
2007 Ford Expedition EL Eddie Bauer 5.4L V8 (Purchased New 05/28/07, wife's daily driver - Sold 06/15/16)
2004 Ford F53 Chassis 6.8L V10 under my 2005 GBM 3500DS Motorhome (Purchased New 10/04 - Sold 09/12/12, replaced with a 2013 Kodiak 300BHSL travel trailer in 10/12)
1995 Ford F150 XLT SuperCab 5.0L V8 (Purchased Used 10/05/12 - Sold 09/23/15)
2014 Ford Fusion Titanium 2.0L EB (Company Car, took delivery on 10/16/14, turned back in 7/24/17)
2014 Ford F150 SVT Raptor SuperCrew 6.2L V8 (Purchased New 12/02/14, my latest toy)
2004 Ford Mustang GT 4.6L V8 (Purchased Used 10/12/15 - Sold 03/17/18)
2017 Ford Explorer Limited 2.3L EB (Ordered 7/20/16, took delivery on 09/14/16, wife's daily driver)
2017 Ford Fusion Sport 2.7L EB AWD (Company Car, took delivery on 8/29/17)
2016 Ford Mustang GT Premium 5.0L V8 (Purchased Used 03/19/18, son's daily driver)
Future FoMoCo Products:
Class A Motorhome w/a Ford Chassis
2020 Ford Bronco
2013 or 14 Ford Mustang GT500
Facebook @nlpracing
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security. --Benjamin Franklin
#11
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 08:57 AM
We have a winner !True but the complexity is still there, and with 5-6spd trannies the savings will hardly be worth the engineering effort.
#12
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 09:05 AM
Also....some of the manual 6 speeds (T 56's as an example), for heavy duty applications like Viper, have a .5 6th, for low RPM cruising. Then use 1-1 (4th) or .8 to 1 (5th) for towing.
The 2 speed rear really isn't needed anymore for light to medium duty use. But in heavy duty trucks, mayso so.
Edited by Ralph Greene, 03 January 2008 - 10:12 AM.
I buy Ford Motor Company Vehicles when they make what I want.
2012 Ford Edge
#13
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 11:46 AM
*************************************************
R.I.P. Nick!
*************************************************
Currently Owned:
2011 Toyota Corolla LE (automotive appliance at its most basic)
2014 Dodge Caravan SXT (3.6L Pentastar V6, 6AT, Very nice van on the inside, decent mpg, solidly built)
Previously:
2007 Toyota Sienna CE (What a piece of junk, 5 recalls while we owned it, still receiving them, started falling apart as soon as the warranty expired)
2002 Dodge Caravan Sport (The v6 has some grunt however bad the reliability of the rest of the van is)
2006 Corolla S (Good ride, good handling, great gas mileage, 26K flawless miles at trade)
1999 F-150 ext cab, short bed, v6, auto 50K flawless miles at trade-in
1993 Ford Tempo GL (The GL stood for Good Luck getting where you're going)
1992 Honda Accord LX (decent reliability to 90K miles, then it started to fall apart)
1985 Ford LTD (the little fox chasis one, with the dog of a 3.8L)
1978 Ford Fairmont Wagon (it came with a small inline six, it left with a monster...)
#14
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 09:33 PM
#15
OFFLINE
Posted 03 January 2008 - 09:54 PM
blueovalforums.com/forums/uploads/profile/photo-thumb-15254.jpg" />
Goodbye my friend...
RIP Nick.
#16
OFFLINE
Posted 05 January 2008 - 11:12 PM
Think of system complexity. If i have two devices varrying ratios, what does that do to my FMEA, calibration, etc. So lets say you mate it to a 4R100, that gives you 8 speeds, which gives you better resolution on the gross power curve of the engine. But are you gonna argue by ditching 2 points on the gross power curve in favor of one device that varries ratios? I can see something like that for a tractor, but for an everyday driver no. I wouldn't want something to be so shift busy around the city, you would get ratios for take off at like 15-16:1, so probably 90% of the time, that ratio would be skipped, or be engaged for like a second. And think of all the ratios you skip over when you get to say 40-50mph. Even if you have an automatic, you can still lock and unlock your torque converter, so in torque multiplication terms that gives you 16 torque ratio outputs. Once again, you get the loss from the converter, but the torque multiplication options are still there. Hold the KISS principal... KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID.
if we were keeping it simple we would still be using C-4s and C-6s
I agree that for the typical driver neither the OD/UD or the 2-sp axle makes a lot of sence.
however there are a lot of non-typical drivers that could make use of 8-10 speeds.
#17
OFFLINE
Posted 05 January 2008 - 11:37 PM
I think that is a great idea, as long as they don't lose durability in the process! I two speed rear end makes a 4 speed tranny into a 8 speed, the extra gears they would gain could be spec'ed based on it's application. Good call Mark B. Morrow!In the article on the increase in mileage on the Super Duty, it was mentioned that the drawback in using higher gear ratios was a decrease in towing performance. That got me thinking of the Columbia two speed rear that Ford used in the 1930s. Why not resurrect this old idea and have the best of both worlds. Lower gears to be used for towing and higher gears for improved mileage the rest of the time.
http://www.hemmings...._feature21.html
Posted by Furious1Auto's iPhone
#18
OFFLINE
Posted 06 January 2008 - 12:13 AM
I had a US Gears under drive in a 1999/2000 F-450, works well when towing a 40 ft car hauler. It kept the diesel in the sweet range.Instead of a 2 speed axle, how about one of these Under/Overdrive units? I've been seriously considering one for my motorhome. Does anybody have any experience with them?
GEAR VENDORS UNDER/OVERDRIVE™
Then I installed US gear under drive in a a 2001 Lightning,thay was a of time and money.
With these 6 and 7 speed trannys coming about, I see no no need for a 2 speed axle or any type under drive....JMO
#19
OFFLINE
Posted 07 January 2008 - 12:56 AM
The more the merrier! Extra gears at higher speeds reduce RPM's and save fuel, while extra gears on the low end improve pulling/towing capabilities. I've driven construction trucks with deep reduction gears and highway trucks with as many as 18 gears. I can tell by your use of the words "sweet spot" that you are/were a trucker! A two speed offering is a low cost way to offer different gear ratios capable of handling different applications in comparison to the cost of designing new transmissions.I had a US Gears under drive in a 1999/2000 F-450, works well when towing a 40 ft car hauler. It kept the diesel in the sweet range.
Then I installed US gear under drive in a a 2001 Lightning,thay was a of time and money.
With these 6 and 7 speed trannys coming about, I see no no need for a 2 speed axle or any type under drive....JMO
Posted by Furious1Auto's iPhone
#20
OFFLINE
Posted 26 April 2011 - 08:49 PM
hi they did offer this rear end in the boss mustang and cougar eliminator...i ran across one that was in a 1969 Boss 302 Eliminator it had a switch on the Hurst shifter.Ford had a prototype of a 2 speed rear end in a 1969 Mercury Cougar Eliminator.
|
|

0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users